Skip to content

Comparison of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes

Comparison of Direct and Indirect Images of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes in Adult Airway Management

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06649526
Enrollment
70
Registered
2024-10-18
Start date
2024-09-01
Completion date
2024-11-01
Last updated
2024-10-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia

Keywords

video laryngoscopy, airway management, intubation

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to answer the question of whether direct laryngoscopy can be performed with videolaryngoscopes. How do the videos of the laryngoscopes provide images directly in laryngoscopy? Primary objective: To compare the images of Hugemed and Mcgrath videolarinygoscope in direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy secondary objective: to compare the effects on haemodynamic response Participants :people who are not expected to have difficult intubation

Detailed description

Direct and indirect images of hugemed and McGrath videolaryngoscope during intubation, haemodynamic responses, procedure time will be compared

Interventions

OTHERendotracheal intubation with videolaryngoscope

The present study will compare the images of two different VLs with Macintosh blades (the McGrath videolaryngoscope and the Hugemed videolaryngoscope) in both indirect (screen images) and direct (images viewed through the mouth) laryngoscopy.

Sponsors

Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

To be between 18 -65 years old Mallampati score I-II Cormack-Lehane score I-II ASA physical status I-II who required endotracheal intubation for elective surgery

Exclusion criteria

Pregnancy Mallampati score III-IV Cormack-Lehane score III-IV ASA physical score III-IV sternomental distance \< 12.5 cm mandibular-hyoid distance \< 6 cm

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of Direct and Indirect Images of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes in Adult Airway Management3 monthsVideolaryngoscopy (VL) is a frequently used method in airway management to improve the success of tracheal intubation in recent years. VLs have a miniature video camera at the tip of the blades which allows indirect visualisation of the glottis (1,2,3). The American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) recommends that a VL should be available and used for all patients with a particularly difficult airway and for whom intubation is planned In recent years, a number of VLs have emerged that offer several advantages over direct laryngoscopy.It is aimed to compare direct and indirect images of mcgrath and hugemed videolaryngoscope.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026