Skip to content

Evaluation, in Humans, of the Correlation Between Hepatotoxicity, Neurotoxicity Induced by Oxaliplatin, and Blood Levels of HMGB1

Evaluation, in Humans, of the Correlation Between Hepatotoxicity, Neurotoxicity Induced by Oxaliplatin, and Blood Levels of HMGB1

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06649474
Acronym
HEPATOXALI
Enrollment
100
Registered
2024-10-18
Start date
2024-09-06
Completion date
2028-06-30
Last updated
2024-10-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adenocarcinoma, Oesophagogastric Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer, Resectable Esophageal Cancer, Resectable Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma, Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Keywords

resecable pancreatic, oesophageal, gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma., Patients able to have a laparoscopy, chemotherapy before surgery

Brief summary

Oesogastric and pancreatic adenocarcinomas are poor-prognosis cancers. Incidence of pancreatic cancer drastically increases to such an extent that it will become the second cause of cancer's mortality by 2030. A major challenge is to optimize the therapies for localized setting, when oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is the standard, before and after surgical excision. Because in 50% of cases oxaliplatin triggers a grade 2-3 sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) which increases post-operative morbidity, decreases histological response to chemotherapy, increases tumor recurrence, and aggravates the risk of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). There is an urgent need to better understand the biological processes involved in SOS, in order to prevent and treat it without stopping or reducing oxaliplatin administration. The biological link between oxaliplatin and SOS has not been described, but recent murine experiments argue for HMGB1 to be the mediator released after exposure to oxaliplatin and inducing SOS, and thereafter CIPN. To date, no biomarker is established between murine and patient analyses, and the release of HMGB1 after oxaliplatin treatment and its effect on hepatic parenchyma is not described in patients. Investigators hypothesized is that HMGB1 would also been increased in patients after oxaliplatin treatment, and correlated to the development of SOS and CIPN. If confirmed, personalized treatment will be possible to target this pathway. Therefore, investigators propose to dynamically explore this hypothesis in localized oesogastric and pancreatic cancer patients who will be routinely managed by an initial laparoscopy and post-oxaliplatin surgical excision.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALassess the serum HMGB1 concentrations before and after an oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy

assess the serum HMGB1 concentrations

Sponsors

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

50 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 50 patients with oesogastric adenocarcinoma

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ECOG WHO Performance status = 0 or 1 * Signed and dated informed consent * Patients with histological diagnosis of oesogastric or pancreatic adenocarcinoma * Resectable tumors * Patients able to have a laparoscopy * In case of absence of peritoneal invasion on the laparoscopy, patient candidate to a chemotherapy schedule by FLOT or FOLFOX in perioperative setting for oesogastric adenocarcinoma, or FOLFIRINOX in perioperative setting for pancreatic adenocarcinoma * Registration in a national health care system (CMU included) * Patient speak and understand the french

Exclusion criteria

* Histology other than adenocarcinoma * Metastatic disease * History of previous treatment with oxaliplatine * History of systemic chemotherapy administration within 5 years prior to inclusion, * Patient with an non balanced progressive condition/disease (liver failure, renal failure (creatinine clearance <30mL/min), respiratory failure, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction in the last 6 months, etc.), * Patient on curative dose anticoagulant, * Patient with complete dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency (Uracilemia ≥ 150 ng/ml), * Patient not operable for the pathology concerned, * Pregnant or breastfeeding woman, woman of childbearing age who has not performed a pregnancy test before the procedure, * Patient with legal incapacity (person deprived of liberty or under curatorship, stutorship, safeguard of justice), * Patient who, for psychiatric, social, family or geographical reasons, cannot be followed and/or comply with the requirements of the study,, * Discovery of peritoneal invasion during the peritoneal exploratory of the laparoscopy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serum HMGB1 concentrationsAt exploratory laparoscopy and at the surgeryAssess Serum HMGB1 concentrations in two groups of patients : with grade 0 or 1 SOS and with grade ≥2 SOS, at two timepoints: before exploratory laparoscopy and before surgical excision to determinate the effect of HMGB1 on SOS development

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
variation of serum HMGBI concentration (ng/ml)at the exploratory laparoscopy, at the first (Day1) and last cycle (assessed up to 75 days) of chemotherapy before surgery (each cycle=14 days) and at the surgerymesurated the serum HMGB1 concentration (ng/ml) at several time of treatment of the patient then comparated these assess the dynamic variation of serum HMGB1 concentrations after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in oesogastric and pancreatic cancer patients with grade 0 or 1 SOS and with grade ≥2 SOS
variation of serum RAGE (receptor of HMGBI) concentrationat the exploratory laparoscopy, at the first (Day1) and last cycle (assessed up to 75 days) of chemotherapy before surgery (each cycle=14 days) and at the surgerymesurated the serum RAGE concentration (ng/ml) at several time of treatment of the patient then comparated these assess the dynamic variation of serum HMGB1 concentrations after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in oesogastric and pancreatic cancer patients with grade 0 or 1 SOS and with grade ≥2 SOS
sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) diagnosisbefore to began chemotherapy and from 15 to 21 days after the last cycle of chemotherapy before surgerycompare SOS histology diagnosis (absent, mild, moderate, severe) with no invasive biological scores APRI and FIB4which use ASAT (U/L), ALAT(U/L), plaquettes (G/L) and the age (years) of the patient
Evaluated the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN)at the first (Day1) and last cycle (assessed up to 75 days) of chemotherapy before surgery (each cycle=14 days); at the surgery and at the first cycle (D1) then last cycle (assessed up to 75 days) after surgerythe CIPN will be evaluate by the investigator who used the CTCAEv5 classification.
Predictive value of HMGB1 for the development of SOS and CIPNfrom exploratory laparoscopy to last cycle of chemotherapy after surgery assessed up to 10 monthCorrelate CIPN, neuropathic pain with SOS, HMGB1, and RAGE measurements

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactMarine JARY, MD
mjary@chu-clermontferrand.fr+33 4 73 75 05 08
Backup ContactBrigitte GILLET
bgillet@chu-clermontferrand.fr

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026