Skip to content

Using a Mirror in the Second Stage of Labor: Effects on Duration and Birth Experience

Impact of Using a Mirror in the Second Stage of Labor on Childbirth Duration and Experience

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06648161
Enrollment
122
Registered
2024-10-18
Start date
2023-02-01
Completion date
2024-10-10
Last updated
2025-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Labor Stage, Second

Brief summary

This study aims to investigate the impact of using a labor mirror during the second stage of labor on both the duration of labor and the mother's overall experience. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does using a labor mirror in the second stage of labor affect the duration of labor? * Does the use of a labor mirror in the second stage of labor affect women's total birth experience scale score? To assess the effect of using a birth mirror during the second stage of labor on the duration of labor and mothers' satisfaction with labor, the researchers will give one group a birth mirror and the other group will receive normal midwifery care. * In the second stage of labor, the birth mirror will be positioned so that the woman can see the progress of the baby as she pushes (lithotomy position). * Within 24 hours after delivery, mothers will complete the Birth Experience Scale and an opinion form about the use of the mirror. * The control group will not receive any intervention.

Detailed description

Childbirth is one of the most significant experiences in a woman's life. The second stage of labor, when the cervix is fully dilated and the baby moves through the birth canal, is a crucial phase. Various techniques and tools are used during this stage to assist delivery, one of which is the labor mirror. This tool allows the mother to visually observe the perineum and monitor the progress of labor, especially in water births. Both handheld and bed-mounted options are available, usually made of acrylic, and they can have adjustable angles for better visualization. The use of a labor mirror offers several benefits. It enables real-time monitoring of the birthing process, allowing midwives to make timely interventions. More importantly, it helps mothers feel more involved in the birth, boosting their confidence and motivation, especially when they see the baby's head. This can lead to more controlled pushing and potentially shorten the duration of labor. In summary, the labor mirror can enhance the birth experience by allowing mothers to participate actively and by providing emotional support, which may reduce the length of the second stage of labor. However, its use is not widespread in Turkey. This study aims to investigate the impact of using a labor mirror during the second stage of labor on both the duration of labor and the mother's overall experience.

Interventions

OTHERLabor Mirror

The labor mirror used in the second stage of labor allows the mother and midwife to observe the descent and birth of the baby during vaginal delivery and provides instant visualization of progress for the mother and midwife, especially in water births or water births

Sponsors

Kocaeli University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* between 38-42 weeks of gestation, * had a healthy fetus, * had no perinatal and obstetric risk, * did not have prolonged trauma, * could understand and speak Turkish

Exclusion criteria

* preterm labor onset, * premature rupture of membranes, * epidural analgesia, * amniotic fluid with meconium, * fetal risk * intervention delivery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) Total ScoreWithin 24 hours postpartumThe Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) is a validated scale measuring women's birth experiences. It has 22 items across 4 subscales. Total score is the sum of all items converted to a 1-4 scale, yielding a range of 22-88. Higher scores indicate a more positive childbirth experience.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of the Second Stage of LaborDuring the second stage of labor, within the birth processThe duration of the second stage of labor was compared between the experimental and control groups to assess the impact of labor mirror use.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Experiment
In the second stage of labor, the birth mirror will be used to allow the mother to see her own perineum. Labor Mirror: The labor mirror used in the second stage of labor allows the mother and midwife to observe the descent and birth of the baby during vaginal delivery and provides instant visualization of progress for the mother and midwife, especially in water births or water births
61
Control
During the birth process, she will receive routine midwifery care and no intervention will be made.
61
Total122

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExperimentControlTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
61 Participants61 Participants122 Participants
Age, Continuous26.82 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.35
25.92 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.02
26.37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.18
Gestational Week at Admission39.21 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
39.33 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.21
39.27 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
61 Participants61 Participants122 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
61 Participants61 Participants122 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
61 Participants61 Participants122 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 610 / 61
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 610 / 61
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 610 / 61

Outcome results

Primary

Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) Total Score

The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) is a validated scale measuring women's birth experiences. It has 22 items across 4 subscales. Total score is the sum of all items converted to a 1-4 scale, yielding a range of 22-88. Higher scores indicate a more positive childbirth experience.

Time frame: Within 24 hours postpartum

Population: The analysis included women who completed the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire within 24 hours after delivery. Participants who withdrew or had incomplete data were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExperimentChildbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) Total Score73.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.76
ControlChildbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) Total Score70.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.6
Secondary

Duration of the Second Stage of Labor

The duration of the second stage of labor was compared between the experimental and control groups to assess the impact of labor mirror use.

Time frame: During the second stage of labor, within the birth process

Population: All participants who completed the second stage of labor with recorded time data were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExperimentDuration of the Second Stage of Labor12.52 MinutesStandard Deviation 4.53
ControlDuration of the Second Stage of Labor19.48 MinutesStandard Deviation 5.58

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026