Skip to content

Effects of Neuromuscular Reeducation Versus Post Facilitation Stretch Technique for Upper Cross Syndrome Among IT Professionals

Effects of Neuromuscular Reeducation Versus Post Facilitation Stretch Technique for Upper Cross Syndrome Among IT Professionals

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06648070
Enrollment
44
Registered
2024-10-18
Start date
2024-07-15
Completion date
2025-07-15
Last updated
2024-10-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Upper Cross Syndrome

Brief summary

This study is a randomised control trial and the purpose of this study is to determine the Effects of Neuromuscular Reeducation Versus Post Facilitation Stretch Technique for Upper Cross Syndrome among IT professionals .

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to determine the Effects of Neuromuscular Reeducation Versus Post Facilitation Stretch Technique for Upper Cross Syndrome among IT professionals we make 2 groups control and treatment group . we give NMR technique to treatment group and PFS technique to control group in patients with upper cross syndrome. first we take base line readings of cervical ROM , NPRS AND neck diasbilty index. after 2 weeks of treatment again we take same readings and compare both readings. with techniques we also perform strengthning excercise of weal muscles for both groups

Interventions

5 repetitions of neuromuscular reeducation technique i.e. deep pressure along muscles origin to insertion with active movement of that muscle with 10 seconds rest of each repetitions. Control group will receive 3- 5 repetitions of Post Facilitation stretch to the tight muscles of UCS i.e. 20% maximal isometric contraction of the muscles to be stretched for 5-10 seconds followed by a rapid stretch ( through the new barrier) of 10 seconds. After stretch muscle is allowed to relax in mid range for 10 seconds.

3- 5 repetitions of Post Facilitation stretch to the tight muscles of UCS i.e. 20% maximal isometric contraction of the muscles to be stretched for 5-10 seconds followed by a rapid stretch ( through the new barrier) of 10 seconds. After stretch muscle is allowed to relax in mid range for 10 seconds.

Sponsors

Foundation University Islamabad
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Randomized Control Trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* IT profressionals * 20 - 40 years * Both genders * Diagnosed UCS * Pain from 2 months * Minimum 4 - 6 hiurs working

Exclusion criteria

* History of cervical spine * Fracture * Trauma to neck

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in ROM2 weeksROM will be measured with goniometer
Pain intensity2 weeksIt will be measured using Numeric pain rating scale
Neck Disability2 weeksIt will be measured using Neck disability index

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Primary ContactHina Ayub, MS-MSKPT
hinaayub881@gmail.com03495830798

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026