Skip to content

What is the Perceived Role of Risk in DOC Healthcare.

What is the Perceived Role of Risk in the Healthcare Received by People in Disorders of Consciousness (DOC)?

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06647433
Enrollment
40
Registered
2024-10-17
Start date
2025-05-01
Completion date
2027-01-31
Last updated
2025-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Disorders of Consciousness

Keywords

Disorders of Consciousness, Decision making

Brief summary

Critical ethnography exploring how decisions are made on behalf of people in disorder of consciousness (DOC). Prospective longitudinal case study design including observation, field interview and video reflexive ethnography.

Interventions

OTHERObservation

case study will be observed participants, methods will include observation, interview and video reflexive ethnography

Sponsors

Royal Hospital for Neuro-disability
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Nottingham
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* People in a DOC: * Working diagnosis of being in a DOC. * Have an appropriate family member able to act as a consultee. * Over 18 years of age. Family members and healthcare workers: * conversational English. * able to give consent. * over 18 years of age. * Involved in decision making on behalf of a person in a DOC

Exclusion criteria

Person in a Disorder of Consciousness * Not in a DOC, diagnosis uncertain, or appears to be emerging. * Clinically unstable or approaching the end of their life.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Meaning based themes on what influences decision making in DOC2 yearsThematic analysis (TA) will consolidate and develop themes across all data sources (i.e., interview and VRE transcripts, field notes). The planned TA approach will borrow theory from reflexive thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2022) and a critical realist TA approach which supports causal explanation development (Fryer, 2022). Causal research questions will be developed and refined throughout data collection and explored through TA.

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactTeresa Clark, PhD Candidate UON
teresa.clark@nottingham.ac.uk800-555-5555
Backup ContactAlison Edgley
alison.edgley@nottingham.ac.uk800-555-5555

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026