Skip to content

Treatment of Gingival Recession With Tunnel Technique Using Connective Tissue Graft and Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin

Treatment of Gingival Recession by Tunnel Technique Using Connective Tissue Graft With or Without Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06646432
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-10-17
Start date
2024-11-01
Completion date
2025-09-30
Last updated
2025-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival Recession

Keywords

Tunneling, Gingival recession, Injectable platelet rich fibrin, Minimally invasive periodontology

Brief summary

Gingival recession is a common periodontal problem. Consequences include teeth sensitivity, poor esthetics and impaired oral hygiene access. Mild cases are managed by optimizing oral hygiene measures, correction of any causative factor such as faulty tooth brushing, improper dental restoration or denture clasp. Prescription of desensitization products such as specific tooth gels or mouth washes can manage the sensitivity problem. Deeper recession defects need to be addressed by surgical procedures. Coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft is the gold standard procedure. However, it has some drawbacks due to the need for papillary incisions and vertical incisions in some cases. Within the era of minimally invasive periodontology, tunnel technique with connective tissue graft showed results comparable to coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft but with some limitations. Addition of another agent may enhance the results of tunnel technique. Injectable platelet rich fibrin is known for its content of growth factors and effects on soft tissue healing. Aim: The study aim is to compare the surgical management of gingival recession with tunnel technique using connective tissue graft and injectable platelet rich fibrin to tunnel with connective graft without injectable platelet rich fibrin. Methodology: 30 patients with miller class I or II gingival recession will be enrolled. 15 in the test group (Tunnel+ CTG+ i-PRF) and 15 in control group (Tunnel+ CTG). Clinical evaluation at 6 months

Detailed description

30 patients with miller class I/II gingival recession will be enrolled in this study. 15 patients will be treated using tunnel technique and palatal connective tissue graft inserted and sutured under the prepared tunnel after being soaked in injectable platelet rich fibrin for 15 minutes. The tunnel with the underlying graft will be advanced coronally. (Test Group) The other 15 patients will be treated the same way as in the first group but without soaking the graft in injectable platelet rich fibrin. (Control Group) Clinical parameters will be evaluated at baseline and 6 months follow-up except post-operative pain which will be assessed after 10 days. Histologic examination of small piece of the graft will be done to assess if there is true saturation of growth factors inside the graft.

Interventions

PROCEDURETunnel with connective tissue graft and injectable platelet rich fibrin

Tunnel with connective tissue graft and injectable platelet rich fibrin

PROCEDURETunnel with connective tissue graft only

Tunnel technique with connective tossue graft only without injectable platelet rich fibrin

Sponsors

Suez Canal University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* More than 21 years old * Systemically healthy * Presence of Miller class I/II gingival recession * Presence of identifiable CEJ

Exclusion criteria

* Smoking * Systemic disease that contraindicates surgical procedures. * Poor compliance with oral hygiene measures * Necrotizing gingival conditions * Ongoing active periodontitis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recession depth6 months after the surgeryit will be recorded as the distance between the CEJ and gingival margin-measurements were performed at the mid-buccal aspect of the teeth, by manual probe and were rounded up to the nearest millimeter.
Keratinized tissue height6 monthsIt will be measured from the mucogingival junction to the gingival margin-measurements were performed at the mid-buccal aspect of the teeth, by manual probe and were rounded up to the nearest millimeter.
Gingival thickness6 monthsIt will be measured at a mid-buccal location 1 mm apical to the probing depth level with an spreader. It will be pierced, perpendicularly to the mucosal surface, through the soft tissue with light pressure until a hard surface is felt. The silicone disk stop will then be placed in tight contact with the soft tissue surface. Penetration depth will be measured.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post operative pain10 daysIt will be measured by Visual analog Scale (VAS) with records from 0 to 10 with 0 means no pain and 10 means very severe pain. The patient will report the degree he experienced pain and choose a score from VAS.
Recession width6 monthsIt will be measured horizontally between the borders of the recession at the level of Cemento-enamel Junction.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactMohammed Abdel-aziz
mohamed_naser@dent.suez.edu.eg00201118580817

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 12, 2026