Skip to content

Residual Inhibition of 40 Hz Burst Sound in Tinnitus Patients

Neural and Clinical Effects of 40 Hz Burst Stimulation in Tinnitus: a Four-phase Self-controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06646302
Enrollment
265
Registered
2024-10-17
Start date
2024-10-28
Completion date
2025-07-18
Last updated
2025-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tinnitus

Keywords

Tinnitus, 40 Hz stimulation, Acoustic therapy, Residual inhibition, Personalized medicine

Brief summary

Tinnitus affects 10-15% of adults and is frequently associated with impaired quality of life, anxiety, and sleep disturbance. Conventional sound therapies based on continuous masking provide inconsistent and short-lived relief, and the neural mechanisms underlying residual inhibition (RI) remain unclear. This study aims to determine whether 40 Hz burst stimulation with high-frequency carriers can achieve longer-lasting RI than continuous sound, and to explore its underlying neural mechanisms using EEG.

Detailed description

Residual inhibition (RI) refers to the temporary reduction or disappearance of tinnitus following sound stimulation and provides an important clue for identifying patients who may benefit from acoustic therapy. However, the effects of different sound stimulation strategies on RI remain poorly understood. This study evaluates whether 40 Hz burst-modulated sound achieves stronger and longer RI compared with conventional continuous stimulation. The trial follows a four-phase design: Phase 1: Exploratory testing of burst versus continuous tones at different frequencies. Phase 2: Large-scale validation in 265 patients. Phase 3: Development of a personalized stimulation protocol using adaptive spectral optimization. Phase 4: EEG investigation of neural mechanisms, focusing on gamma oscillations and functional connectivity changes. The primary outcomes are the strength and duration of tinnitus suppression. Secondary outcomes include EEG markers such as γ-band power spectral density and phase-locking value. By combining behavioral and neurophysiological measures, this study aims to establish 40 Hz burst stimulation as a novel rhythm-based sound therapy and to provide mechanistic insights that may enable more effective, personalized tinnitus management.

Interventions

OTHERPersonalized 40 Hz Broadband Stimulation

Broadband acoustic stimulus (125 Hz-12 kHz) amplitude-modulated at 40 Hz with a 50% duty cycle. A polynomial regression and FFT-based algorithm applies individualized frequency weighting, combining population data (70%) and patient-specific responses (30%). Delivered for 60 seconds at 10 dB above the individual minimum masking level (MML).

OTHER40 Hz Pure Tone Stimulation

Pure tone stimulus at the optimized frequency (matched to tinnitus characteristics or high-frequency carrier), amplitude-modulated at 40 Hz with a 50% duty cycle. Delivered for 60 seconds at 10 dB above MML.

OTHERContinuous Broadband Noise

Continuous broadband noise spanning 125 Hz-12 kHz without 40 Hz modulation. Delivered for 60 seconds at 10 dB above MML as an active control condition.

Sponsors

Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosed with subjective tinnitus; 2. Chronic tinnitus: tinnitus course ≥ 1 month; 3. Normal middle ear function; 4. The average hearing threshold (defined as mean of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) of the unaffected ear \< 60 dB; 5. Tinnitus can be heard under normal circumstances. 6. Subjects are able to understand the purpose of the study, volunteer to participate and cooperate with the instructors to complete the experiment, and be willing to sign the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Acute phase tinnitus; 2. Fluctuating tinnitus loudness; 3. Severe psychiatric disorders; 4. Inability to complete tinnitus testing; 5. Fluctuating or retrocochlear hearing loss; 6. Conductive hearing loss; 7. Currently participating in other research projects that may affect tinnitus; 8. Subjects who are not considered suitable for this clinical trial by the researchers.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tinnitus suppression strengthImmediately after the sound stimulation session.Residual inhibition depth, 0-100% reduction
Residual inhibition durationImmediately after the sound stimulation session.Time in seconds until tinnitus returns to baseline after stimulation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
EEG spectral power changesmeasured across the entire 10-minute EEG recording session (baseline, during stimulation, and post-stimulation)
EEG functional connectivity changesmeasured across the entire 10-minute EEG recording session (baseline, during stimulation, and post-stimulation)

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026