Malnutrition, Child, Nutrition Poor
Conditions
Brief summary
The framework for Pediatric Integrated Nutrition Pathway for Acute Care (P-INPAC) was developed by the Canadian Malnutrition Task Force (CMTF); however, it has not been implemented in a research setting. The framework by CMTF for Integrated Nutrition Pathway for Acute Care (INPAC) in adults was also implemented in the "More-2-Eat" project which led to development of best practices in nutritional culture of the hospitals. Therefore, we intend to undertake this feasibility project at 3-sites to train staff and evaluate the implementation of P-INPAC components as part of routine healthcare procedure.
Detailed description
The P-INPAC pilot study will be a 3-phase multi-center research study in hospitalized children, conducted at The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, and two other Canadian pediatric centres: Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec and McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario. P-INPAC is an algorithm which helps to identify, assess, and treat children with malnutrition. In the first phase of the study, we will perform an audit of health records of all hospitalized patients at one selected study ward, one day of every other week for 8 weeks, at each of the 3 study sites to track their routine nutrition care. We anticipate auditing 80-100 patients/site in this cycle (total 240-300 patients). In addition, ≈12- 20 patients/ site (≈ 60 in total) who consent to detailed malnutrition screening and assessment would also be identified, assessed, and followed up one month after discharge. In addition, a questionnaire assessing the malnutrition knowledge, attitude, and self-perceived practices (KAP) amongst healthcare professionals will be conducted with staff, including trainees, at each site's study ward. Further, the workload of the study ward's Registered Dietitian (RD) will be assessed for 3 days. In the second phase of the study, the health care team from each site's study ward will be trained by the site implementation research team about the P-INPAC, and how to administer nutritional screening and perform nutritional assessments, which is the Subjective Global Nutrition Assessment (SGNA). Finally, in the third phase, we will monitor and evaluate the implementation of the first 2 steps of the P-INPAC (screening & assessment) over a period of 4 months assessing the acceptability, adoption, and coverage of improved nutrition care practices on the same pediatric study wards. We anticipate auditing 160-200 patients/site in this cycle (total 480-600 patients). In addition, detailed patient level data collection will take place in a selected group of consented patients, ≈24-40 patients per site from the 3 sites (≈120 in total). We would also follow-up with these patients a month after discharge. Healthcare providers will be invited to answer the KAP questionnaire post-implementation version. We will compare responses from phase 1 with phase 3 (pre-/ post-follow up). And, the workload of the ward RD will be assessed again over 3 days.
Interventions
OTHERPediatric Integrated Nutrition Pathway for Acute Care Pathway (P-INPAC)
The pediatric working group of Canadian Malnutrition Task Force has developed an evidence-informed algorithm named the Pediatric Integrated Nutrition Pathway for Acute Care (P-INPAC). The P-INPAC outlines a process to improve nutrition care by: 1. implementing nutrition screening at point-of-admission 2. introducing standard care measures to prevent the development of malnutrition in children admitted with normal nutrition status, including standardizing the process of monitoring food intake early and systematically to identify when standard care measures are not sufficient 3. ensuring the moderately and severely malnourished patients receive timely specialized care in the form of a comprehensive assessment and treatment; and 4. ensuring moderately and severely malnourished patients receive adequate post discharge follow-up and nutrition care. In this pilot study, we will be implementing the first two steps of P-INPAC only (screening and assessment).
Sponsors
The Hospital for Sick Children
St. Justine's Hospital
McMaster Children's Hospital
Study design
Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Days to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
Phase 1 and Phase 3 - Audited patient group inclusion Criteria: 1. ≥ 30 days of age and less than18 years of age on day of assessment 2. Anticipated Length of hospital stay ≥24 hours from day of assessment Phase 1 \& Phase 3 Detailed patient group inclusion Criteria: 1. Admitted to either a general medical or surgical ward 2. ≥ 30 days of age and less than 18 years of age on day of assessment 3. Anticipated Length of stay ≥ 24 hours from day of assessment 4. Speak English (or French at Quebec site) or have a family proxy available at the meal to provide information if first language of patient is not English (or French at Quebec site) 5. Patient/ caregiver provides written consent to participate
Exclusion criteria
a. Patients with eating disorder, somatization disorders, ARFID, FORM 1 etc. where the study interaction might interfere with the messaging or therapeutic plan as set out by the responsible team. Phase 1 and 3 for Health Care Providers inclusion criteria: 1. Implied consent to participate by completing the KAP questionnaire 2. Providing clinical service for the select ward
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline nutrition risk screening using STRONGkids or PNST | 2-month period (phase 1) | Determine routine standard nutritional care practices related to nutrition risk screening in hospitalized children during phase 1 of study using a validated tool, such as, STRONGkids or PNST. |
| Baseline nutrition risk screening using weight | 2-month period (phase 1) | Determine routine standard nutritional care practices related to nutrition risk screening in hospitalized children during phase 1 of study using routine anthropometrics - weight |
| Baseline nutrition risk screening using height or length | 2-month period (phase 1) | Determine routine standard nutritional care practices related to nutrition risk screening in hospitalized children during phase 1 of study using routine anthropometrics - height or length in children under 2 years of age |
| Baseline nutrition risk screening using head circumference | 2-month period (phase 1) | Determine routine standard nutritional care practices related to nutrition risk screening in hospitalized children during phase 1 of study using routine anthropometrics - head circumference in children under 2 years of age |
| Determine baseline knowledge among healthcare providers using the KAP questionnaire | 2-month period (phase 1) | Determine baseline knowledge among healthcare providers on recognizing malnutrition and its management in hospitalized children, including perceived barriers and practices, using the KAP questionnaire |
| Determine changes in knowledge among healthcare providers using the KAP questionnaire | 4-month period (phase 3) | Determine changes in knowledge among healthcare providers on recognizing malnutrition and its management in hospitalized children in Phase 3, including perceived barriers and practices, using the KAP questionnaire after training was completed in phase 2 |
| Determine success with training and feasibility of nutrition risk screening in hospitalized children using STRONGkids and PNST | 4-month period (phase 3) | Determine success with training and feasibility of implementing the P-INPAC framework by assessing changes in standard nutritional care practices related to nutrition risk screening in hospitalized children during phase 3 of study using a validated tool, such as, STRONGkids and PNST |
| Determine success with training and feasibility of nutrition risk screening in hospitalized children using weight | 4-month period (phase 3) | Determine success with training and feasibility of implementing the P-INPAC framework by assessing changes in standard nutritional care practices related to nutrition risk screening in hospitalized children during phase 3 of study using routine anthropometrics - weight |
| Determine success with training and feasibility of nutrition risk screening in hospitalized children using height/ length | 4-month period (phase 3) | Determine success with training and feasibility of implementing the P-INPAC framework by assessing changes in standard nutritional care practices related to nutrition risk screening in hospitalized children during phase 3 of study using routine anthropometrics - height or length in children under 2 years of age |
| Determine success with training and feasibility of nutrition risk screening in hospitalized children using head circumference | 4-month period (phase 3) | Determine success with training and feasibility of implementing the P-INPAC framework by assessing changes in standard nutritional care practices related to nutrition risk screening in hospitalized children during phase 3 of study using routine anthropometrics - head circumference in children under 2 years of age |
Countries
Canada
Outcome results
None listed