Skip to content

Feasibility of Intermittent Fasting During Chemotherapy

Intermittent Fasting During Curatively Intended Chemotherapy for Malignant Lymphoma - a Randomized Feasibility Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06645093
Acronym
FasteStudien
Enrollment
40
Registered
2024-10-16
Start date
2024-10-31
Completion date
2026-12-01
Last updated
2026-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer, Fasting, Lymphoma

Keywords

Chemotherapeutic Toxicity, Chemotherapy, Adverse Effect, Short-term fasting, Feasibility studies, Fasting

Brief summary

The goal of this randomized controlled parallel group trial is to examine if fasting before and after chemotherapy is safe, feasible and acceptable. The study population will include patients with either Hodgkin lymphoma or Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma. The main questions aimed to answer are: Whether fasting during chemotherapy is safe for patients, whether it is feasible to implement in a clinical setting, and whether patients find it acceptable. We also want to examine a number of patient-reported outcome measures regarding health status and quality of life, such as dietary intake and adverse events from chemotherapy. Researchers will compare fasting to standard treatment. Participants will: * Fast 24 hours before and 24 hours after chemotherapy in addition to standard treatment or receive only standard treatment * Keep a diary of their dietary intake 24 hours before and 24 hours after chemotherapy * Keep a diary of their dietary intake for three consecutive days between chemotherapy cycles * Answer questionnaires/questions in relation to side effects from fasting, side effects/adverse events of chemotherapy, quality of life * Take bioimpedance analysis (including body mass index and body composition) * Take blood- and feces samples

Interventions

OTHERFasting

Fasting implies 0 kilojoule. Water ad libitum is permitted.

Sponsors

Akershus University Hospital Trust
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Oslo
Lead SponsorOTHER
Oslo University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
St. Olavs Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Safety and feasibility study,-pilot study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma planned to receive R-CHOP (rituximab, vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and prednisolone) and Hodgkin lymphoma receiving ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine) * Age ≥ 18 years * ECOG status 0-2 * Normal weight and overweight (BMI ≥ 18,5 kg/m\^2)

Exclusion criteria

* Receiving concurrent radiation therapy and/or treatment * Other concomitant disease that may make intermittent fasting complicated such as diabetes mellitus * ECOG status: \> 3 * BMI \< 18,5 kg/m2 * Age \> 80 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety, measured as 1) number of adverse events1 yearTo test whether fasting is safe. 1) Explored by investigating adverse events from intermittent water-only fasting
Safety, measured as 2) changes in body weight1 yearTo test whether fasting is safe. 2) by investigating changes in body weight throughout the treatment comparing the intervention and control groups.
Feasibility,- measured by 1) recruitment (attrition rate)1 yearWhether fasting is feasible. Explored in order to determine whether a larger trial can be successfully conducted in a similar setting with lymphoma patients fasting during cancer treatment.
Feasibility,- measured as 2) compliance1 yearWhether fasting is feasible. Explored in order to determine whether a larger trial can be successfully conducted in a similar setting with lymphoma patients fasting during cancer treatment.
Acceptability,- patient burden, acceptance and experience1 yearWhether fasting is acceptable. Explored from a perspective of the participant, as the degree to which patients find the trial, its procedures, and its interventions agreeable, suitable, and satisfactory during chemotherapy treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse events from chemotherapy1 yearAdverse events including number of infections, graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events
Toxicity, including hematological toxicity and standard organ toxicity1 yearEvaluation of toxicity, including hematological toxicity and other relevant organ toxicities with blood test and using computer tomography (CT) or fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography computer tomography (FDG-PET-CT)
Health-Related Quality of Life1 yearBy using EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire
Nutritional impact symptoms1 yearThe linguistic and content validation of the translated and culturally adapted Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) will be utilized for gathering data on nutritional impact symptoms
Dietary intake1 yearDietary intake 24 hours before and 24 hours after chemotherapy and the usual intake between chemotherapy cycles using food diary.
Weight loss, body mass index (BMI) and body compositon1 yearBioelectrical impedance (BIA) will be used to collect data to explore changes in body weight, BMI and body composition.
Unplanned readmissions and hospitalization1 yearIn terms of numbers of readmissions, unplanned out- or inpatient visits, and days in the hospital

Countries

Norway

Contacts

CONTACTSonja Brunvoll, PhD
s.h.brunvoll@medisin.uio.no+4792087911
CONTACTInger Ottestad, PhD
i.o.ottestad@medisin.uio.no+4799735017
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSonja Brunvoll, PhD

Department of Nutrition, University of Oslo

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORInger Ottestad, PhD

Department of Nutrition, University of Oslo

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 21, 2026