Skip to content

From Rotator Cuff Repair to Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty - Clinical and Radiological Results

From Rotator Cuff Repair to Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty - Clinical and Radiological Results

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06644729
Enrollment
733
Registered
2024-10-16
Start date
2024-09-11
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2024-10-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Injuries, Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy, Rotator Cuff Tears

Keywords

PROM, Rotator Cuff Repair, Rotator Cuff Tear, Cuff Arthropathy

Brief summary

In the planned study the investigators will invite 733 participants 10 years after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair to a follow up examination. Shoulder pain is a common problem in the Norwegian population. Rotator cuff tear is a major cause of shoulder pain with a reported prevalence of up to 51% in patients 60-80 years of age. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is performed in an increasing proportion of these patients. Good results in shoulder function has been reported, although there is a lack in published good quality studies and long term follow up of these patients. There is also a lack of evidence regarding the association between radiologically-verified re-tear and clinical outcome. In this project, the investigators address these critical gaps in knowledge and aim to investigate the factors influencing the clinical outcome after rotator cuff surgery and re-tear in a large prospective cohort study. The investigators will investigate how many participants suffering from poor outcome and develop cuff arthropathy in need of reverse shoulder arthroplasty after 10 years.

Detailed description

10 years after surgery: A cohort study of 733 participants with rotator cuff tear operated arthroscopically at Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital during 2010-2014. The investigators will ask the participants included at the time of surgery to participate in a ten-year follow-up. The investigators will ask them to submit validated patient reported outcome measurements (PROMs): Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index, EQ-5D-5L, Subjective Shoulder Value. The investigators will also evaluate the radiological result and signs of cuff arthropathy on x-ray according to Hamada-Fukuda and Seebauer classification. The main objective is to quantify the relative importance of preoperative and perioperative prognostic factors on functional outcomes ten years after rotator cuff repair. The secondary objective is to identify and quantify patients who need shoulder replacement surgery ten years after rotator cuff surgery as a measure of failure.

Interventions

PROCEDUREArthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Sponsors

Sykehuset Telemark
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority
CollaboratorOTHER
Lovisenberg Diakonale Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Operated at Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital in the time period 2010-2014 with an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair * Included in the rotator cuff registry at Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital * Able to read and write Norwegian

Exclusion criteria

* Lack of competence to consent * Not able to submit patient reported outcome measurements in any way and not able to undergo x-ray * Patient is unwilling to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index, Norwegian Version10 Years after surgeryScale 0-2100. The maximum score is 2100 (higher score means worse outcome). Zero (0) represents no symptoms at all.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Eurocol questionnaire EQ-5D-5L Norwegian version10 Years after surgeryStandardized generic questionnaire measuring health in five dimensions. 5 health dimensions described above includes 5 response categories of no problem, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The 5 responses give a health state or profile represented by a 5-digit number (for example, 12231) corresponding to response categories reported by patients for successive dimensions
Subjective Shoulder Value10 Years after surgeryA patient's subjective shoulder assessment expressed as a percentage of an entirely normal shoulder, which would score 100%.
Rotator cuff survival10 Years after surgerySurvival of rotator cuff repair in terms of number of reverse shoulder arthroplasties performed in the study group
Cuff arthropathy10 years after surgeryDevelopement of cuff arthropathy on x-ray by Hamada-Fukuda and Seebauer classification. X-ray will be conducted in one Y-view (scapular view), three anterioposterior view (with arm in neutral, 30 degrees of internal rotation and 60 degrees of external rotation).

Countries

Norway

Contacts

Primary ContactBirthe Marie Roang-Winjum, MD
birroa@sthf.no0047 90665939
Backup ContactKjersti Kaul Jenssen, MD, PhD
kjerstikaul.jenssen@lds.no0047 91392624

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026