Skip to content

Patient Satisfaction and Crestal Bone Changes Around One-piece Zirconia(Zr) and Titanium(Ti) in Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdenture

Assessment of Patient Satisfaction and Crestal Bone Changes Around One-piece Zirconia and Titanium Implants in Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdenture: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06643975
Acronym
(Zr) - (Ti)
Enrollment
20
Registered
2024-10-16
Start date
2024-06-15
Completion date
2025-10-15
Last updated
2024-10-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complete Edentulism

Keywords

Zirconia, One-piece, Overdenture, Implant

Brief summary

This interventional randomized clinical trial study is conducted to assess patient satisfaction and crestal bone changes around one-piece Zr and Ti Implants in mandibular implant-retained overdenture in completely edentulous male patients in the age group between (50-60)years old to know if there will be a significant difference between the two types of dental implants through 12 months after the definitive prosthetic loading

Interventions

OTHEROne-piece zirconia dental implants

One-piece zirconia dental implants with zirconia ball attachments, these implants are metal free made of oxide ceramics with cutting-edge Selective laser melting(SLM) surface treatment technology

OTHEROne-piece titanium dental implants

One-piece Titanium dental implants with titanium ball attachments, these implants are gold standard compatible implants

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
50 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male patients * The age range of 50 to 60 years old (average of 55). * moderately developed mandibular residual ridges, covered with healthy mucosa, firmly attached to the underling bone and with average mucosal thickness (2-3) mm. * At least 12 mm of vertical bone height in the mandible allowing for placement of a 10 mm implant (2 mm safety distance to inferior alveolar nerve). * Patients were selected with Angle class-I maxillomandibular relationship with sufficient inter-arch space (13-15mm

Exclusion criteria

* Heavy smokers of more than 10 cigarettes a day * Poor oral hygiene. * Patients with temporomandibular joint disorders(TMD), * Patients suffered of xerostomia, * Patients exhibited Para-functional habits, or recent extractions were excluded. * Patients with systemic diseases that might affect bone quality or quantity, or retard healing of the surgical wounds were excluded. * Patients receiving intravenous forms of bisphosphonates. * Patients who have had radiation therapy to the head and neck region. * Patients with existing implants in the jaws * Patients with previous bone grafting in either the maxillary or mandibular jaws.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Crestal bone changes12 monthsMeasuring the amount of marginal(crestal) bone changes either loss or gain around the dental implants using the cone beam computed tomography(CBCT) in millimeter scales about the original marginal bone height measured at the time of the visit of final (definitive) prosthetic loading. The positive(+ve) values mean an increase (gain) in the marginal bone height around the implants, the more the +ve value, the more the gain in the bone height which is the better outcome, while the negative (-ve) values mean decrease (loss) in the marginal bone height around the implants, the more the -ve value, the more loss in the bone height, which is the worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patients Satisfaction12 monthsmeasuring the degree of patient satisfaction using a Patient's Denture Assessment (PDA) questionnaire, via a Likert scale which uses a 5-point system from 1 to 5, All items are scored as follows: unsatisfactory =1 hardly satisfactory =2 moderately satisfactory=3 very satisfactory=4 excellent satisfaction=5 The greater (higher) the score, the more patient satisfaction, which is the better outcome, while the weaker (lower) the score, the less is patient satisfaction, which is the worse outcome.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactMohammad Irakky, masters
implanteeth@hotmail.com00201111232777
Backup ContactOmnia M. Refai, Phd
omnia_refaie@dent.asu.edu.eg00201202420046

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026