Skip to content

Modulation of Propofol Injection Pain by Rubbing and Distraction

Spinal and Supra-spinal Modulation of Propofol Injection Pain by Rubbing and Distraction: A Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06643832
Enrollment
135
Registered
2024-10-16
Start date
2024-10-16
Completion date
2025-02-17
Last updated
2025-02-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Distraction, Pain, Propofol Injection, Rubbing

Keywords

Pain, Modulation

Brief summary

This prospective randomized controlled study will be conducted to evaluate the effects of rubbing and distraction on the incidence and severity of propofol injection pain and compare them with the standard intravenous lidocaine method.

Detailed description

Propofol has become one of the most common anesthetic agents used for sedation, induction, and maintenance of anesthesia because of its unique pharmacological properties. Pain during bolus injection is a major drawback with an incidence as high as 80%-90% in an untreated patient. One of the most effective factors that alleviate the injection pain involves pretreatment with lidocaine. Spinal modulation of pain is explained by the melzack gate control theory, it proposed that stimulation of A beta fibers by touch and vibration, modulate the dorsal horn gate and therefore the nociceptive input from the periphery could be reduced. (5) Regarding the use of this concept for managing propofol pain, only one study was conducted and revealed that rubbing didn't decrease the incidence but significantly decreased the severity of pain. Distraction is a method of removing attention; so, it modifies cognitive pain perceptions by altering nociceptive responses and triggering an internal pain-suppressing system. Therefore, it causes a decrease in the activation of areas in the brain (e.g.: thalamus and insula) which contribute significantly to pain perception. we will combine rubbing and distraction, as methods for spinal and supra-spinal pain modulation, to evaluate their effects on propofol injection pain and compare them with the standard intravenous lidocaine method.

Interventions

OTHERRubbing Distraction

gently touching on proximal part of the IV injection site with the palm of the hand extending to the elbow. This will be started 5 seconds before propofol injection (not mixed with any drug) and continued until loss of consciousness. Also, a mobile video with duration of 10 seconds will be used for distraction and will be started 5 seconds before propofol injection so as to be ended at the time of first pain assessment.

DRUGLidocaine (drug)

lidocaine will be used by mixing it with the propofol before intravenous injection

OTHERSaline

intravenous propofol will be given without mixing with any drug (except for 2 ml saline to ensure blindness of the outcome assessor).

Sponsors

Tanta University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

open label for rubbing distraction group which is the novel approach to be tested in this trial (obviously, participant and pain assessor in the rubbing distraction group can not be blinded). however, lidocaine group and control group patients and their pain assessors are blinded to group assignment. so a final description of (partially blinded study) can be adopted.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients of either sex * American Society Anesthesiologists physical (ASA) status I-II * age between 18-65 years old * undergoing elective surgeries under general anesthesia using Propofol for anesthetic induction.

Exclusion criteria

* Allergy to experimental drugs * Abuse of alcohol, analgesia, or sedative antidepressant * Difficulty in communication * Chronic pain syndromes, thrombophlebitis, neurological disease, and analgesic administration at the time of the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of propofol injection painPain will be evaluated every 5 seconds during the propofol injection until loss of concioussness. The highest pain score will be recordedPain will be graded using a four-point scale: 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain (pain reported only in response to questioning without any behavioral signs), 2 = moderate pain (pain reported in response to questioning and accompanied by a behavioral sign or pain reported spontaneously without questioning), and 3 = severe pain (i.e., strong vocal response or response accompanied by facial grimacing, arm withdrawal, or tears).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Degree of painevery 5 seconds during injection and the highest value will be recorded.Pain will be graded using a four-point scale: 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain (pain reported only in response to questioning without any behavioral signs), 2 = moderate pain (pain reported in response to questioning and accompanied by a behavioral sign or pain reported spontaneously without questioning), and 3 = severe pain (i.e., strong vocal response or response accompanied by facial grimacing, arm withdrawal, or tears)
Recall of pain1 hour after surgeryPatients who will report pain during propofol injection will be asked if they recalled this pain
adverse effects1 hour after surgeryLike redness or edema will be examined at the site of propofol injection

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026