Skip to content

Palliative Steroeotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Palliative Standard Radiotherapy in Patients With Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Palliative Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs. Palliative Standard Radiotherapy in Patients With Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06641791
Enrollment
196
Registered
2024-10-15
Start date
2025-04-07
Completion date
2031-06-01
Last updated
2026-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

Brief summary

This study is being done to answer the following question: Does stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) provide better cancer control compared to standard radiation therapy (RT) for those with advanced head and neck cancer?

Detailed description

Stereotactic body radiation therapy, or SBRT, is a cancer treatment that more precisely delivers radiation to the tumour area with less radiation going to unaffected areas around the tumour. It uses fewer treatments of higher doses compared to standard radiation therapy. This study is being done to find out if this approach is better than the usual approach for advanced head and neck cancer. The usual approach is defined as care most people get for advanced head and neck cancer.

Interventions

RADIATIONStandard Radiotherapy (SRT)

2400 cGy in 3 fractions - day 0/7/21, OR, 2500 cGy in 5 fractions over 1 week

RADIATIONStereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT)

4500 cGy in 5 fractions (twice a week to primary and nodal GTV, OR, 4000 cGy in 5 fractions twice a week if organs at risk.

Sponsors

Canadian Cancer Trials Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically confirmed mucosal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck arising from at least one of the following sites: oro/hypopharynx, oral cavity, supraglottic larynx, maxillary sinus, nasal cavity, or unknown primary * Stages TX or T0-T4/N0-N3 * Must be considered unfit for curative intent RT as determined by the treating oncologist(s) * Geriatric 8 score \<14 * Patient must be ≥18 years of age * Staging CT or MRI of the head and neck within 8 weeks prior to randomization * Chest CT or x-ray. PET CT is permitted if CT is of diagnostic quality. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status 0-3 * Participants of childbearing potential must have agreed to use a highly effective contraceptive method during protocol therapy. * Patients with a prior malignancy whose natural history or treatment does not have the potential to interfere with the safety or efficacy assessment of the investigational treatment are eligible for this trial.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. * Prior systemic therapy (including immunotherapy). * Prior radiotherapy to the head and neck excluding superficial radiotherapy for head and neck skin cancer that does not overlap with current protocol treatment. * Prior head and neck cancer excluding skin cancer. * Patients with tumour locations/at risk of SBRT toxicity, including glottic/subglottic larynx, T4 hypopharynx, post-cricoid, cervical esophagus, circumferential pharyngeal involvement, extension/proximity to brain/optic structures, any single tumour mass \>8 cm (in one dimension). * \> 2 nodal levels (Level 1a/b not counted); retropharyngeal lymph nodes (where the closest edge is \< 2cm from the closest edge of CTV (primary or nodal) will not be considered as a different level). Note: a single lymph node mass that spans 2 levels will be considered as 1 level. * Gross tumour poorly visualized on CT/MRI. * Definitive radiological or clinically evident distant metastases. * Scleroderma/CREST syndrome.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Overall Survival estimated according to Kaplan-Meier's methodology6 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival6 years
Local Regional Failure Free Survival6 yearsdefined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of any of the following, whichever comes first: * The first record of appearance (radiological or clinical) of local or regional disease progression/recurrence. * Surgery of primary tumour at any time performed for clinical or radiological (RECIST 1.1) disease persistence/progression/recurrence with tumour present/unknown on final pathology. * Neck dissection \> 20 weeks from the end of radiation therapy performed for clinical or radiological (RECIST 1.1) disease persistence/progression/recurrence with tumour present/unknown on final pathology.
Response Rate evaluated by RECIST6 years
Number and Severity of Adverse Events6 years
Patient Reported Outcomes utilizing PRO-CTCAE6 yearsWe will qualitatively compare PRO-CTCAE item scores between arms at 8 weeks from the start of RT, and examine PRO-CTCAE item scores at 12 months post-RT in the SBRT arm, as an indicator or persisting (consequential or "late") RT toxicity with SBRT to the head and neck region.
Patient Reported Outcomes utilizing FACT-HN6 yearsproportion of patients between arms who have a meaningful worsening (12 points or greater) of QOL
Healthcare Resource Utilization utilizing EQ-5D-5L6 yearsAll enrolled participants who have received at least one fraction of protocol therapy are evaluable for health economics. Those who have completed the Health Utilities Index (EQ-5D-5L), will be evaluable for cost-utility analyses.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

CONTACTWendy Parulekar
wparulekar@ctg.queensu.ca613-533-6430
STUDY_CHAIRIan Poon

Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences, UHN, Toronto, ON Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 16, 2026