Skip to content

Deployment and Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Software for Electrocardiogram Analysis and Management in Primary Care

Deployment and Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Software for Electrocardiogram Analysis and Management in Primary Care

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06637293
Acronym
DAISEA-ECG
Enrollment
2000
Registered
2024-10-15
Start date
2025-10-06
Completion date
2027-03-31
Last updated
2025-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Care Provider, Structural Heart Disease

Brief summary

The DAISEA-ECG project aims to improve the diagnosis of heart diseases in primary care through the DeepECG platform, which combines ECG-AI and ECHONeXT algorithms. This study uses a stepped wedge design, where each Family Medicine Group acts as its own control. The FMGs will gradually transition from the control period (without AI recommendations) to the intervention period (with AI recommendations activated) in a randomized sequence. The primary objective is to compare the sensitivity of family physicians in detecting cardiac pathologies, with and without the assistance of the DeepECG platform. Sensitivity is defined as the proportion of patients correctly referred to cardiology or for transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) among those who indeed required cardiovascular evaluation, as confirmed by an independent adjudication committee.

Detailed description

Mathematically, sensitivity is calculated as True Positive / (True Positive + False Negative), where True Positive represents correctly referred patients and false negatives represents patients who should have been referred but were not. The secondary objectives include determining the rate of cardiovascular evaluation referrals before and after the intervention (implementation of the DeepECG platform), the individual characteristics of the intervention (PPV, NPV, and specificity), as well as evaluating the feasibility of implementing AI-based automatic ECG interpretation in primary care through surveys of family physicians and cardiologists. PPV: Positive predictive value NPV: Negative predictive value

Interventions

DEVICEDeepECG plateform diagnosis & recommendations

EchoNeXT& ECG-AI algorithm

Sponsors

Montreal Heart Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

stepped wedge randomization

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Family Physicians or Nurse Practitioners Family physicians or nurse practitioners (NPs) practicing in one of the participating FMGs. Family physicians who have given their free and informed consent. Patients Adult patients (18 years or older). Patients without follow-up in cardiology or internal medicine for cardiovascular issues (arrhythmia, heart failure, myocardial infarction, atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease) or those who had a negative investigation in the past with no additional follow-up. ECG Any 12-lead ECG performed with the MUSE GE 360 machine. ECG of adequate technical quality for interpretation (otherwise, it will be automatically rejected by the platform). \-

Exclusion criteria

* Family Physicians or Nurse Practitioners Family physicians practicing exclusively in pediatrics (patients under 18 years old). Family physicians unable to follow the project guidelines.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
sensitivity of cardiology referrals18 monthsCompare the sensitivity of cardiology referrals made by family physicians and nurse practitioners before and after the activation of AI-assisted diagnostics and recommendations from the DeepECG platform.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of cardiology referrals18 monthsCompare the specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of cardiology referrals made by family physicians and nurse practitioners before and after the activation of AI-assisted diagnostics and recommendations.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactRobert Avram, MD
robert.avram.md@gmail.com514 376 3330
Backup ContactMarie-Gabrielle Lessard, MSc
marie-gabrielle.lessard@icm-mhi.org514 376 3330

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026