Dimethyl Sulfoxide
Conditions
Brief summary
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) wet bonding has shown promising results in several in vitro studies. However, there are a lack of clinical trials which prove the advantages of this technique. The aim of the study is to clinically assess the effect of DMSO wet bonding on composite restoration in non carious cervical lesions.
Interventions
OTHERUniversal single bond adhesive
Will be applied and light cured for 20 seconds.
OTHERDMSO
DMSO application on tooth followed by active application of universal single bond adhesive and light cured for 20 seconds.
Sponsors
Manipal University College Malaysia
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Two similar non carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) on the facial/labial surfaces of premolars. * NCCLs of score 1-3 on the Smith and Knight tooth wear index. * Favorable occlusion and teeth are in normal contact.
Exclusion criteria
* NCCLs on the lingual surface. * Medically compromised individuals. * Periodontally compromised teeth. * Bruxism and visible wear facets in the posterior dentition. * Fractured or visibly cracked premolars and canines. * Known allergies to resin-based restorative materials. * Presently undergoing orthodontic treatment. * Abutment teeth for fixed or removable prostheses.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Fracture of material | From treatment to 3-6 months follow up | Different fracture patterns and retention failures may occur in relation to the type of restoration: cracks, chipping/ delamination, bulk fractures, or incomplete and complete loss of retention. Assessed by Visual examination and short air drying. Criteria set from Clinically excellent/very good(sufficient) (Score 1) to Clinically poor (entirely insufficient)(Score 5) |
| Marginal adaptation | From treatment to 3-6 months follow up | There are different interfaces between the dental hard tissue, restorative material, and adhesive and/or luting resin/cement layer. Each interface can degrade and potentially alter marginal adaptation. In clinical practice, it is impossible to distinguish failures between the different interfaces. Therefore, only the marginal adaptation as such can be assessed by visual examination and short air drying. Scores given depending upon the quality of restoration from Clinically excellent/very good (sufficient) (Score 1) to Clinically poor (entirely insufficient) (Score 5) |
Contacts
Primary ContactAnchu Rachel Thomas
Outcome results
None listed