Skip to content

SCINTIX [BgRT} Using RMRS in Solid and Soft Tissue Tumors

Performance and Safety of Biology-Guided Radiotherapy Using the RefleXion Medical Radiotherapy System in in a Variety of Solid and Soft Tissue Tumors (BIOGUIDE-X2)

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06634706
Enrollment
96
Registered
2024-10-10
Start date
2025-12-01
Completion date
2027-01-01
Last updated
2025-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Distributed and Orphan Tumors, Head and Neck Cancer, Hepatobiliary Carcinoma in Situ, Pelvic Cancer, Retroperitoneal Cancer, Thoracic Cancer

Brief summary

This study proposes 6 anatomic groupings which each can be defined similarly as the head and neck grouping above. These 6 groupings are: (1) Head and Neck, (2) Thoracic not including lung parenchymal, (3) Hepatobiliary and other non-hepatobiliary abdominal tumors, (4) Retroperitoneal, (5) Pelvic, and (6) Distributed or orphan. The study is designed to gather essential imaging data on the RefleXion Medical Radiotherapy System (RMRS) to validate the accuracy of FDG-directed BgRT, also known as SCINTIX therapy, in various anatomical groupings. Study subjects will go through the entire SCINTIX treatment workflow, including radiopharmaceutical administration and live PET imaging, but without turning on the treatment beam. Collected data will be used offline to generate the set of machine instructions that would have been used during treatment delivery to calculate the emulated BgRT dose distribution, i.e., what the delivered dose would have been had the treatment beam been turned on during the session. The 6th category (Distributed or orphan) is meant to capture tumor types that can manifest across anatomies and/or for which utilization of stereotactic radiotherapy for treatment is relatively rare, with lymphomas being a prototypical example.

Detailed description

Ablative radiotherapy has become an integral tool for the treatment of primary tumors and metastatic lesions across the human body. Because ablative radiotherapy techniques like stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) involve delivering high doses of radiotherapy in a few fractions, they have the potential to cause serious injury to normal tissues near the target lesion. Therefore, a standard concern for radiation oncologists is to conformally and precisely deliver ablative radiotherapy while maximally sparing surrounding organs and tissues. This goal is relevant throughout the anatomy and pertains as much to tumors in the head and neck as it does to those in the pelvis. Biology-guided radiotherapy is a novel radiotherapy delivery mechanism that achieves precision by aiming beamlets of external radiotherapy by tracking PET emissions that originate from the target after it has taken up an injected radiotracer. Because the radiotherapy beamlets are guided to the tumor in real-time, this technology holds strong promise for reducing margins around the target and thereby reducing normal tissue toxicities.

Interventions

DEVICERefleXion X1 Radiotherapy System [Imaging Only]

kVCT and FDG-PET imaging using the RefleXion X1 Radiotherapy System in different anatomical regions

Sponsors

RefleXion Medical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age greater than 21 years. 2. A new or prior diagnosis of biopsy-proven cancer. 3. At least one active non-osseous primary or metastatic tumor that is located in one of the assigned anatomical groupings and dispositioned to undergo 3-5 fractions of SBRT. A lesion is considered active if viable malignancy is confirmed either by biopsy or by diagnostic imaging (as interpreted by the multidisciplinary care team). 4. Target tumor size ≥2cm and ≤5cm. 5. Target tumor is discrete and assessed by investigator to meet diagnostic PET screening criteria for BgRT candidacy: 1. SUVmax≥6, as assessed on diagnostic PET/CT performed within 60 days of enrollment with no new intervening oncologic therapies. 2. Ratio of target tumor SUVmax to SUVmean of local background region (defined as a 3 mm shell 1.5 cm from the target tumor) is greater than 6, as assessed on diagnostic PET/CT performed within 60 days of enrollment with no new intervening oncologic therapies. 6. ECOG Performance Status 0-3. 7. Must have completed any other oncologic therapies at least 15 days prior to planned start of study procedures (preferably 30 days) and must have no plans to initiate systemic therapy until after study follow up is complete -OR- must be recorded by physician to have an active lesion that is unresponsive to ongoing systemic therapy. 8. Females of childbearing potential should have a negative urine or serum pregnancy test within 14 days prior to initiation of study scans.

Exclusion criteria

1. Clinically significant blood glucose abnormalities that preclude a satisfactory FDG PET/CT scan. 2. Lung parenchymal and bone target tumors 3. At the physician's discretion regarding expected target motion, FDG-avid structures not intended for radiation are within: 1. 3 cm from target on diagnostic PET/CT in directions where limited target motion is expected 2. 4 cm from target on diagnostic PET/CT in directions where sizable target motion is expected 4. Known allergy to FDG. 5. Known psychiatric or substance abuse disorder that would interfere with conduct of the study. 6. Pregnant, breast-feeding or expecting to conceive during the study. 7. Patient weight exceeding the weight limit outlined per user manual. 8. Patients with pacemakers and other implantable devices deemed at high risk by the treating physician for complications secondary to radiotherapy, according to institutional guidelines and published guidelines (e.g. AAPM task group-203). 9. Active inflammatory bowel disease, scleroderma, or other disorder deemed by the treating physician to put the patient at risk for excess toxicity in the setting of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or FDG injection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Emulated BgRT Delivery accuracyAssessed for each emulated delivery through study completion, an average of 2 yearsThe percent of radiotherapy fractions where the emulated BgRT dose distribution is shown to be consistent with the approved BgRT treatment plan (i.e., 95% of DVHDelivered points for the BTZ and OAR fall within bounded DVH of the approved BgRT plan).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
BgRT deliverabilityAssessed for each emulated delivery through study completion,an average of 2 yearsPercent of fractions where there is concordance between physical and digital phantoms of emulated BgRT delivery derived from human subject PET emissions. Concordance is defined as a standard gamma index of 90% of pixels meeting the 3mm/3% deviation standard.

Contacts

Primary ContactDebradenise S. Brooks
dbrooks@reflexion.com6504828435
Backup ContactMario Esquivel
mesquivel@reflexion.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026