Skip to content

Safety and Feasibility Testing of a Smaller Network Version of AIDANET

Safety and Feasibility Testing of a Smaller Network Version of AIDANET (MiniNET)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06633965
Acronym
MiniNET
Enrollment
8
Registered
2024-10-09
Start date
2024-11-20
Completion date
2024-12-18
Last updated
2025-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 1 Diabetes

Keywords

Type 1 Diabetes, Meal Boluses, Fully Closed Loop (FCL), AIDANET

Brief summary

A randomized 1:1 crossover trial that intends to demonstrate feasibility and safety of the Automated Insulin Delivery as Adaptive NETwork (AIDANET) system run in a new smaller network version, used in full closed loop (FCL) by adults who have been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Detailed description

The study will be performed for about 36 hours at a local hotel. Following the hotel session, participants will undergo a 7 day/6-night Remote Monitored At-Home use session. A one-week control period gathering data on glycemic control and insulin administration with the participants usual care therapy will also be completed. Participants will be randomized 1:1, to either Group A (control period prior to AIDANET use) or Group B (control period after AIDANET use).

Interventions

DEVICEAIDANET

AIDANET is a fully automated, utilizing a Bolus Priming System (BPS) that recognizes meal ingestion and delivers a quick priming dose of insulin prior to extreme blood sugar excursions.

Sponsors

Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
DexCom, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Marc Breton
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomized 1:1 to assess a 1-week usual care period before use of the AIDANET system (Group A) or after use of the AIDANET system (Group B).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥18.0 and ≤60 years old at time of consent 2. Clinical diagnosis, based on investigator assessment, of type 1 diabetes for at least one year 3. Currently using insulin pump for at least three months; Any pump, either open loop or hybrid closed loop may be used. 4. Currently using insulin for at least six months. 5. Willingness to switch to use a commercially approved personal insulin (e.g., lispro or aspart, or biosimilar approved products) within the study pump as directed by the study team. 6. Currently using a Dexcom G6 or G7 CGM. 7. Has one or more supportive companions knowledgeable about emergency procedures for severe hypoglycemia and able to contact emergency services and study staff that either lives with participant or located within approximately 30 minutes of participant and able to locate participant in the event of an emergency. 8. Participant not currently known to be pregnant or breastfeeding. 9. If participant capable of becoming pregnant, must agree to use a form of contraception to prevent pregnancy while a participant in the study (e.g. hormonal contraception, abstinence from heterosexual intercourse). A negative serum or urine pregnancy test will be required for all females of childbearing potential. Participants who become pregnant will be discontinued from the study. Also, participants who during the study develop and express the intention to become pregnant within the timespan of the study will be discontinued. 10. Willingness to use the study FCL system (CGM, pump, and phone) during the relevant study period. 11. Willingness not to start any new non-insulin glucose-lowering agent during the course of the trial. 12. Willingness to participate in all study procedures including the house/hotel session, exercise challenges (e.g., one hour per day during hotel), and to consume approximately 3 unannounced meals per day during the relevant portion of the supervised hotel session. 13. Access to internet at home and willingness to upload data during the study as needed. 14. Investigator has confidence that the participant can successfully operate all study devices and is capable of adhering to the protocol. 15. Participant is proficient in reading and writing English.

Exclusion criteria

1. Plans to start a new non-insulin glucose-lowering agent (e.g., GLP-1 receptor agonists, Symlin, DPP-4 inhibitors, sulfonylureas). Participants may be on a stable dose of such an agent for at least the past month. 2. Current use of an SGLT-2 or SGLT-1/2 inhibitor due to risk of euglycemic DKA. 3. Hemophilia or any other bleeding disorder. 4. History of severe hypoglycemic events with seizure or loss of consciousness in the last 12 months. 5. History of DKA event in the last 12 months. 6. History of chronic renal disease (Stage 4 or unstable Stage 3b per investigator judgment) or currently on peritoneal or hemodialysis. 7. History of adrenal insufficiency. 8. Currently being treated for a seizure disorder. 9. Hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism that is not adequately treated. 10. Coronary artery disease or other heart condition that would prevent participation in moderate intensity exercise. 11. Use of oral or injectable steroids at the time of enrollment or within the last 4 weeks. 12. Planned surgery during the study period. 13. Known ongoing adhesive intolerance that is not well managed. 14. A condition, which in the opinion of the investigator or designee, would put the participant or study at risk. 15. Participation in another interventional trial at the time of enrollment. 16. Participant with a direct supervisor involved in the conduct of the trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the Mean Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) Between the Week of the Usual Care Observational Period and the Week of AIDANET At-Home.2 weeksThis study represents a small pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of the small-version AIDANET system and is not formally powered. Nevertheless, the randomized crossover design will allow for analysis of period effects between Group A and Group B. Comparison between these groups will be made to determine if a period effect can explain part of the benefit of the FCL system during the at-home period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Percent Time-in-range2 weeksDifference in percent CGM samples in 70-180 mg/dL between the Week of the Usual Care Observational Period and the Week of AIDANET At-home. Represented as AIDANET minus Usual Care.
Difference in Percent Time-below-range2 weeksDifference in CGM percent samples \< 70mg/dL between the Week of the Usual Care Observational Period and the Week of AIDANET At-home. Represented as AIDANET minus Usual Care.
Difference in Percent Time-in-tight-range2 weeksDifference in percent CGM samples in 70-140 mg/dL between the Week of the Usual Care Observational Period and the Week of AIDANET At-home. Represented as AIDANET minus Usual Care.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Eight participants with T1D provided informed consent. One did not pass the screening process and another withdrew prior to the study intervention. The remaining six participants were randomized and completed the trial in December 2024.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Usual Care→AIDANET
Participants will complete 7 days/6 nights at home usual care period using their personal equipment. Participants will then use the AIDANET system during a 3 days/2 nights hotel admission. Participants will continue to use the AIDANET system at home for 7 days/6 nights. AIDANET: AIDANET is a fully automated, utilizing a Bolus Priming System (BPS) that recognizes meal ingestion and delivers a quick priming dose of insulin prior to extreme blood sugar excursions.
4
AIDANET→Usual Care
Participants will use AIDANET system during a 3 days/2 nights hotel admission. Participants will continue to use the AIDANET system at home for 7 days/6 nights and then will complete 7 days/6 nights at home usual care period using their personal equipment. AIDANET: AIDANET is a fully automated, utilizing a Bolus Priming System (BPS) that recognizes meal ingestion and delivers a quick priming dose of insulin prior to extreme blood sugar excursions.
2
Total6

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicUsual Care→AIDANETAIDANET→Usual CareTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Age, Continuous42.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
36.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
40.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
BMI (kg/m2)27.7 kilograms per square-meter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
33.8 kilograms per square-meter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
29.7 kilograms per square-meter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
CGM use
Dexcom G6
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
CGM use
Dexcom G7
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Diabetes duration (y)21.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
31.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
24.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Percentage of HbA1c (%)7.1 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
7.3 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1
7.17 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.41
Pump use
Insulet / Omnipod 5
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Pump use
Tandem /t:slim X2 with Control IQ
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Weight (kg)81.3 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.5
87.5 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
83.4 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 40 / 2
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 40 / 2
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 40 / 2

Outcome results

Primary

Change in the Mean Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) Between the Week of the Usual Care Observational Period and the Week of AIDANET At-Home.

This study represents a small pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of the small-version AIDANET system and is not formally powered. Nevertheless, the randomized crossover design will allow for analysis of period effects between Group A and Group B. Comparison between these groups will be made to determine if a period effect can explain part of the benefit of the FCL system during the at-home period.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: One participant withdrew prior to study intervention. Results were only analyzed for participants who started and completed data collection.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care→AIDANETChange in the Mean Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) Between the Week of the Usual Care Observational Period and the Week of AIDANET At-Home.-6.8 miligrams per deciliterStandard Deviation 15.1
AIDANET→Usual CareChange in the Mean Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) Between the Week of the Usual Care Observational Period and the Week of AIDANET At-Home.-2.1 miligrams per deciliterStandard Deviation 20.7
Secondary

Difference in Percent Time-below-range

Difference in CGM percent samples \< 70mg/dL between the Week of the Usual Care Observational Period and the Week of AIDANET At-home. Represented as AIDANET minus Usual Care.

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care→AIDANETDifference in Percent Time-below-range0.93 percentage of time-below-rangeStandard Deviation 2.1
AIDANET→Usual CareDifference in Percent Time-below-range0.06 percentage of time-below-rangeStandard Deviation 0.45
Secondary

Difference in Percent Time-in-range

Difference in percent CGM samples in 70-180 mg/dL between the Week of the Usual Care Observational Period and the Week of AIDANET At-home. Represented as AIDANET minus Usual Care.

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care→AIDANETDifference in Percent Time-in-range1.55 percentage of time-in-rangeStandard Deviation 4.34
AIDANET→Usual CareDifference in Percent Time-in-range2.76 percentage of time-in-rangeStandard Deviation 10.6
Secondary

Difference in Percent Time-in-tight-range

Difference in percent CGM samples in 70-140 mg/dL between the Week of the Usual Care Observational Period and the Week of AIDANET At-home. Represented as AIDANET minus Usual Care.

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care→AIDANETDifference in Percent Time-in-tight-range1.69 percentage of time-in-tight-rangeStandard Deviation 10.71
AIDANET→Usual CareDifference in Percent Time-in-tight-range4.01 percentage of time-in-tight-rangeStandard Deviation 7.19

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026