Skip to content

Clinical Case Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Tolerability of a Topical Facial Treatment on Healthy Females with Fitzpatrick Skin Types V and VI

Clinical Case Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Tolerability of a Topical Facial Treatment on Healthy Females with Fitzpatrick Skin Types V and VI

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06633731
Enrollment
11
Registered
2024-10-09
Start date
2023-04-24
Completion date
2024-03-19
Last updated
2024-10-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skin Smoothness, Radiance, Overall Appearance

Keywords

anti-aging, Fitzpatrick Skin Types V and VI, Skin Rejuvenation

Brief summary

This single-center, open-label, clinical case trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a topical facial treatment when applied by a license esthetician in clinic in a series of 3 sessions with 1 month intervals on healthy women with Fitzpatrick Skin Types V and VI and mild to moderate global facial radiance, skin smoothness, and overall appearance. The treatment will include an topical facial treatment, biocellulose mask, and post-procedure cream. Furthermore subjects followed a 12 week skincare regimen consisting of a gentle cleanser, bland moisturizer, and bland sunscreen. Eleven (11) healthy female subjects completed the clinical study.

Detailed description

This single-center, open-label, clinical case trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a topical facial treatment when applied by a license esthetician in clinic in a series of 3 sessions with 1 month intervals on healthy women with Fitzpatrick Skin Types V and VI and mild to moderate global facial radiance, skin smoothness, and overall appearance. The treatment will include an topical facial treatment, biocellulose mask, and post-procedure cream. Furthermore subjects followed a 12 week skincare regimen consisting of a gentle cleanser, bland moisturizer, and bland sunscreen. The efficacy and tolerability of the topical facial treatment in improving mild to moderate global facial radiance, skin smoothness, and overall appearance was evaluated by Investigator clinical efficacy grading and tolerability grading by a board-certified dermatologist, subject tolerability grading, and clinical photography.

Interventions

OTHERBiocellulose Mask

Immediately after treatment, a Biocellulose Mask was applied to the subjects global face for 8 to 10 minutes.

OTHERPost Procedure Cream

Immediately after treatment and after Biocellulose Mask removal, the Post-Procedure Cream was applied to the subjects global face. Subjects were instructed to apply to the global face from days 1 - 3 post treatment.

Subjects were instructed to wash their face with the Gentle Foaming Cleanser twice daily for 12 weeks.

Subjects were instructed to apply the facial moisturizer twice daily to the global face from day 3 after treatment until next study visit.

OTHERsunscreen

Subjects were instructed to apply the bland sunscreen to the global face once daily in the morning, with re-application with extended sun exposure per FDA guidelines.

Sponsors

Tone Dermatology
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Revision Skincare
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
45 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Individuals with Fitzpatrick Skin Type V and VI * Individuals with mild to moderate global facial radiance, skin smoothness, and overall appearance (Score 2 - 6 on a 10-point modified Griffiths scale). * Individuals willing to undergo a washout period of 3 days.

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals who are nursing (breastfeeding), pregnant, or planning to become pregnant during the study. * Individuals currently having or having a history of cold sores (Herpes Simplex) on the face.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Investigator Clinical Efficacy Grading versus Baseline12 weeksThe primary efficacy endpoint will be favorable analysis of the Investigator Clinical Efficacy Grading of radiance, skin smoothness, and overall appearance using a Modified Griffith's 10-point scale at week 4, week 8, and week 12 versus baseline (0:None, 9=Severe). A reduction in score indicates improvement.
Lack of Significant Change in Investigator Tolerability Parameters versus Baseline12 weeksThe primary tolerability endpoint will be favorable analysis of Investigator Tolerability grading of erythema, edema and dryness completed by study investigator at baseline, weeks 4, 8 and 12. Local cutaneous tolerability will assessed using a four-point scale: 0 = None 1 = Mild 2 = Moderate 3 = Severe. A decrease in score indicates an improvement.
Lack of Significant Change in Subjective Tolerability versus Baseline12 weeksThe secondary tolerability endpoint will be favorable analysis of Subject Tolerability grading of burning, itching, and stinging completed by subjects at baseline, weeks 4, 8 and 12. Local cutaneous tolerability will assessed using a four-point scale: 0 = None 1 = Mild 2 = Moderate 3 = Severe. A decrease in score indicates an improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Photography: VISIA-CR and Antera 3D12 weeksThe secondary efficacy endpoint will be favorable analysis of clinical photography including VISIA® and Antera 3D® digital imaging at week 4, 8, and 12 versus baseline. A reduction in visual radiance, skin smoothness, and overall appearance on post-baseline timepoints compared to baseline is indicated an improvement
Change in Facial Parameters in a Self-Assessment Questionnaire versus Baseline and Percent Agreement12 weeksThe secondary endpoint will be favorable analysis of Self-Assessment Questionnaires completed by subjects at baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12. Subjects are asked to rate statements based on a scoring system ranging from 5 (completely agree) to 1 (completely disagree). A change in response values at weeks 4, 8, and 12 compared to baseline response values indicates an improvement. The best outcome is to Completely Agree with the statement / question being asked.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026