Skip to content

Benefits of Empagliflozin in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction Without Diabetes Mellitus

Benefits of Empagliflozin in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction Without Diabetes Mellitus

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06632561
Acronym
HFrEF
Enrollment
74
Registered
2024-10-09
Start date
2021-07-26
Completion date
2022-03-14
Last updated
2024-10-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Brief summary

The study is a short to mid-term randomized single-blind placebo controlled study that aimed to detect the effects of empagliflozin (a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor) compared to placebo on LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, LV ejection fraction, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), functional capacity and quality of life (QoL) among non-diabetic patients with HFrEF.

Interventions

DRUGEmpagliflozin 10 mg

Empagliflozin (a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor) 10 mg one tablet daily dose for 6 months

DRUGPlacebo

Sugar pills one tablet daily for 6 months

Sponsors

Ashraf Wasfy Beshay Aziz
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ambulatory non-diabetic adult male and non-pregnant female patients with established diagnosis of heart failure (HF) New York Heart Association functional class II-IV and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40% (calculated by echocardiography within the previous 6 months before randomization). * Patients should have stable symptoms and stable guideline-directed medical therapy for HF within the last 3 months before randomization. It was mandatory that all patients have reached the maximum tolerated doses of guideline-directed medical therapy for HF and are regular on them for at least 3 months before participation. * Patients were not known to be diabetic and have no history of diabetes remission and their baseline glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) should have been \< 5.7%. * Patients have never been on SGLT2 inhibitor therapy before. * Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) should have been ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m² using the chronic kidney disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine equation (2009)

Exclusion criteria

* Women who were pregnant at time of selection, possibly pregnant, breast-feeding, or planning to become pregnant during the study period. * Patients who had acute coronary syndrome, cardiac surgery, stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the last 3 months before randomization. * Patients who had infiltrative cardiomyopathy, muscular dystrophies, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, peripartum cardiomyopathy, pericardial restriction or chemotherapy induced cardiomyopathy within 12 months before randomization. * Patients with severe valvular heart disease. * Patients who had acute decompensated HF or were on continuous parenteral inotropic agents with 3 months before randomization. * Patients who had cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation within 3 months before randomization. * History of recurrent urinary tract infection, cancer or any life threatening condition or psychiatric disease incompatible with being in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The changes in LV volumes (mL)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 monthsTo measure the changes in of Left Ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) (mL) and Left Ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) (mL) via transthoracic echocardiography using the modified Simpson's rule (the biplane disk summation approach). Then the change from baseline to the 6th month was compared within each group separately and the means of variables were compared between both groups.
The changes in of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) (%)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 monthsTo measure the changes in of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) (%) via transthoracic echocardiography using the modified Simpson's rule (the biplane disk summation approach). Then the change from baseline to the 6th month was compared within each group separately and the means of variables were compared between both groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The changes in the N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (pg/mL)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 monthsMeasurement of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (pg/mL) at baseline and at the end of treatment phase after 6 months within both study arms via the electrochemiluminescence immunoassay ECLIA. Then the change from baseline to the 6th month was compared within each group separately and the means of variables were compared between both groups.
The changes in 6 minute walk test (meters)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 monthsMeasurement of 6 minute walk test (meters) at baseline and at the end of treatment phase after 6 months within both study arms. Then the change from baseline to the 6th month was compared within each group separately and the means of variables were compared between both groups.
The changes in the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) (points)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 monthsMeasurement of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) (points) at baseline and at the end of treatment phase after 6 months within both study arms. Then the change from baseline to the 6th month was compared within each group separately and the means of variables were compared between both groups.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
a (five points or more) improvement in the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure QuestionnaireFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 monthsSince a five point change in MLHFQ is considered clinically meaningful, we have performed an exploratory analysis to compare the proportion of patients with ≥5 points improvement in MLHFQ in both groups.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026