Skip to content

Comparison Between Aesthetic Functional Appliances and Twin Block in Correction of Skeletal Class II

Comparison Between Aesthetic Functional Appliances and Twin Block in Correction of Skeletal Class II: Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06631235
Enrollment
42
Registered
2024-10-08
Start date
2024-11-01
Completion date
2026-11-01
Last updated
2024-10-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skeletal Malocclusion

Keywords

classII, mandibular advancement, twin block

Brief summary

The goal of this is to evaluate the skeletal, dental and soft tissue effects between aesthetic functional appliance and Twin block appliance in treatment of skeletal class II in ( growing male/female patients)

Detailed description

The sample will be randomly divided into 2 equal groups according to the appliance will be used: Group 1: Aesthetic Functional appliance Group 2: Twin block Methods: \*Radiographs (CBCT) will be taken before starting the treatment (T1) and after obtaining Class I occlusion and normal overjet (T2) by sequential appliances. appliances. * Lateral cephalograms -extracted from CBCT- will be used to evaluate the effect of the two appliances. * CBCT will be used to evaluate root resorption and bony changes in the condyle .

Interventions

OTHERorthopedic appliance

appliances are used to correct skeletal class II due to mandibular deficiency

OTHERaesthetic orthopedic appliance

aesthetic appliances are used to correct skeletal class II due to mandibular deficiency

Sponsors

Mansoura University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Skeletal Class II pattern with ANB angle exceeding 6° and Wits appraisal of 2 mm or more. * Mandibular deficiency (SNB angle less than 77°). * Growing patients. * No prior orthodontic intervention. * The vertical skeletal classification shows a horizontal or neutral growth pattern. * Overjet ≥ 8mm.

Exclusion criteria

* Developmental abnormalities with atypical or irregular patterns of growth and maturation. * Any indications or manifestations, as well as any prior medical records, of Tempro-Mandibular Joint (TMJ) disorders, such as the presence of clicking, pain, limitations, or deviations.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
skeletal effectsone yearcephalometric linear and angular measurements
dental effectsone yearcephalometric linear and angular measurements
soft tissue effectsone yearcephalometric linear and angular measurements

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
root resorptionone yearroot resorption measured from CBCT

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
CBCT evaluation of TMJone yearadverse effects of aesthetic functional appliance on the condylar head

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary Contactrana ka Abuzaid, orthodontist
ranaabuzaid52@gmail.com1009389116
Backup Contactkhaled Ah Awad, surgon
khaled_awd2013@yahoo.com1009297331

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026