Skip to content

Safety and Feasibility of Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Secretome in the Treatment of Liver Cirrhosis: a Comprehensive Evaluation of Fibrosis Reduction, Immunomodulation, and Hepatic Regeneration: a Single Center, Randomized, Phase I Clinical Trial

Safety and Feasibility of Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Secretome in the Treatment of Liver Cirrhosis: a Comprehensive Evaluation of Fibrosis Reduction, Immunomodulation, and Hepatic Regeneration a Single Center, Non-randomized, Phase I Clinical Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06629909
Enrollment
54
Registered
2024-10-08
Start date
2024-12-01
Completion date
2026-10-31
Last updated
2024-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Cirrhosis

Keywords

liver cirrhosis, secretome, stem cells, HUCMSC

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell (HUCMSC) derived secretome injection is safe and effective in patient with liver cirrhosis. The main questions it ams to answer are: 1. How safe is secretome Injection as an adjuvant therapy for liver cirrhosis patients? 2. How effective is secretome injection in liver fibrosis 6 months after injection? 3. Does secretome injection improve liver function after 6 months after Injection? 4. Does secretome injection affect Child Turcotte Pugh score? 5. How does secretome affect pro inflammatory and anti Inflammatory cytokine in patient with liver cirrhosis? 6. How does secretome injection affect the quality of life in live cirrhosis patient? 7. What is the relationship between secretome injection and encephalopathy? Researchers will compare secretome injection group (patients who recieve secretome injections) to best practice treatment group (patient who receive supportive treatment including hepatoprotector and ursodeoxycolic acid) Researchers will compare the intervention group (patients who are injected with HUCMSC derived secretome) and control group (patients who are only monitored and given their usual drugs) Patients will: Be injected with secretome or take hepatoprotector and ursodeoxycolic acid every 2 weeks for 4 months. Do several test such us fibroscan, stroop test, psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score, short form 36 questionnaire, IL-6, TNF alfa and blood test for albumin, SGOT, SGPT, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, INR, creatinine, ureum, hemoglobin, hematocrite, leukocyte, and thrombocyte. Visit the clinic once every two weeks to receive drugs and treatment for 4 months. Follow up visit to review treatment progress on 3rd months (2 weeks post treatment), 7th months (3 months post treatment),10th months (6 months post treatment)

Interventions

3 ml Injection of secretome for 8 times two weeks apart

Sponsors

Tarumanagara University
CollaboratorOTHER
Liver Clinic Prof Ali Sulaiman
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Pelni Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Baermed
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
17 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age above 17 years, both men and women * Patient is willing to participate and sign informed consent * Patient is diagnosed with liver cirrhosis confirmed by clinical examination and diagnostic imaging * Liver cirrhosis patient with Child-Pugh Class B * Patient is in a stable condition without life threatening complications such as active gastrointestinal bleeding, severe infection, severe renal failure (eGFR&\>30) at time of registration * Patient is not receiving experimental drugs for liver cirrhosis for the past 6 months * Patient is able and willing to comply with research protocol including follow up visits and evaluations

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with uncontrolled psychiatric disorders * Patient who is diagnosed with hepatic or non- hepatic malignancy * Lactating and pregnant patient * Patient who has allergy or hypersensitivity reaction towards secretome

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Fibroscan and M2BPGi six month after secretome injectionsFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 months, From enrollment to the end of study at 10 monthsPatients achieved a response if there are changes in Fibroscan and M2BPGi after secretome injections within six months.best outcome when the M2BPGi Fibroscan decrease, worst outcome when the M2BPGi and Fibroscan increase
Changes in Complete Blood Count and Kidney function after secretome injectionsFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 months, From enrollment to the end of study at 10 monthsSecretome is safe If hemoglobin and hematocrit, leukocyte, platelet, ureum, and creatinine are still in normal level after secretome injection (best outcome) Secretome is not safe if hemoglobin and hematocrit, leukocyte, platelet, ureum, and creatinine are out of the normal level after secretome injection (worst outcome)
Changes of albumin, SGOT and SGPT levels in six month after secretome injectionsFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 months, From enrollment to the end of study at 10 monthsPatients achieved a response if there are changes in albumin, SGOT and SGPT levels after secretome injections within six months.best outcome when the albumin, SGOT and SGPT decrease, worst outcome when the albumin, SGOT and SGPT increase

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes of CTP and MELD score in six month after secretome injectionsFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 months, From enrollment to the end of study at 10 monthsPatients achieved a response if there are changes in CTP and MELD score after secretome injections within six months.best outcome when the CTP and MELD score decrease, worst outcome when the CTP and MELD score increase
Changes of SF-36 questionnaire score in six month after secretome injectionsFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 months, From enrollment to the end of study at 10 monthsPatients achieved a response if there are changes in SF-36 questionnaire score after secretome injections within six months.best outcome when the SF-36 questionnaire score increase, worst outcome when the SF-36 questionnaire score decrease
Changes of IL-6 and TNF-α levels in six month after secretome injectionsFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 months, From enrollment to the end of study at 10 monthsPatients achieved a response if there are changes in IL-6 and TNF-α levels after secretome injections within six months.best outcome when the IL-6 and TNF-α decrease, worst outcome when the IL-6 and TNF-α increase
Changes of Stroop test dan PHES score in six month after secretome injectionsFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 months, From enrollment to the end of study at 10 monthsPatients achieved a response if there are changes inStroop test dan PHES score after secretome injections within six months.best outcome when the Stroop test dan PHES score increase, worst outcome when the Stroop test dan PHES score decrease

Countries

Indonesia

Contacts

Primary ContactHans Ulrich Baer, Prof. Dr. med
hans.baer@baermed.ch628156963254
Backup ContactSiufui Hendrawan, M.D., Ph.D.
siufui@gmail.com+41 387 30 70

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026