Skip to content

The Usage of Telemetric Prechamber Sensor Reservoir in Management of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Comparisson of Benefit for Patients with Implanted Telemetric Prechamber Sensor Reservoir.

Usage of Telemetric Prechamber Sensor Reservoir in Management of Hydrocephalus

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06629168
Enrollment
33
Registered
2024-10-08
Start date
2018-01-01
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2025-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Patients

Keywords

Normal pressure hydrocephalus, VP drainage, telemetry, pressure monitoring

Brief summary

Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is a preventable and treatable cause of dementia. However, as a nosological entity, it is significantly underdiagnosed, often being mistakenly classified as presenile or senile dementia without further investigation. Ongoing management is crucial, currently relying mainly on indirect methods-clinical and imaging-based. Telemetry offers a real-time, online method to assess actual cerebrospinal fluid pressures, which are crucial for patient management. Telemetry allows for tailoring treatment to the individual patient. This project is planned as a pilot study before a more extensive research project.

Detailed description

Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is a preventable and treatable cause of dementia. However, as a nosological entity, it is significantly underdiagnosed, often being mistakenly classified as presenile or senile dementia without further investigation. Diagnosing NPH is not straightforward; it is based on a series of examinations, the results of which determine whether the patient is a responder and therefore a candidate for shunt surgery (implantation of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt). The medical literature identifies additional criteria that predict whether the implantation of the shunt will have a good or poor effect. However, treatment from a neurosurgical perspective does not end there. Ongoing management is crucial, currently relying mainly on indirect methods-clinical and imaging-based. Telemetry offers a real-time, online method to assess actual cerebrospinal fluid pressures, which are crucial for patient management. Telemetry allows for tailoring treatment to the individual patient. This project is planned as a pilot study before a more extensive research project.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTlumbar puncture

Standardized lumbar puncture in L3/4 or L4/5 in diagnosis of hydrocephalus and 10-meter-walking test prior and 4 hours after lumbar puncture. Mini-mental state examination is done.

External lumbar drainage placement for assessing responsivity of external derivation of cerebrospinal fluid. It is test of responsivity to ventriculo-peritoneal shunt placement

Surgical procedure based on implantation a thin catheter into brain lateral ventricle (placed through a burrhole from Kocher point) and connection to prechamber and valve (placed behind the ear under skin) and similar thin catheter pushed under skin of neck, chest and abdomen (where put intraperitoneally). Telemetric prechamber placement according the randomization (www.randomization.com) and the envelope method of choosing of patients.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTFollow-up control #1

Patients after VP shunt placement are assesed in gait, general condition and mini-mental state examination score 3 month after surgery. Brain CT control.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTFollow-up control #2

Patients after VP shunt placement are assesed in gait, general condition and mini-mental state examination score 6 month after surgery. Brain CT control.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTFollow-up control #3

Patients after VP shunt placement are assesed in gait, general condition and mini-mental state examination score 9 months after surgery. Brain CT control.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTFollow-up control #4

Patients after VP shunt placement are assesed in gait, general condition and mini-mental state examination score a month after surgery. Brain CT control, 10-meter-walking test, MMSE, self-assessment.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTTelemetric prechamber reading

Non-invasive reading of telemetric prechamber made during each follow-up control.

OTHERValve setting change

Changing of valve setting according patient's actual condition. Decission based on clinical state, radiological finding on CT and values readed from telemetric prechamber. Timing - each follow-up control.

Sponsors

University Hospital Hradec Kralove
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with diagnosed communicating hydrocephalus * mini-mental state examination test \> 10 points * Absence of any structural lesion on MRI or CT * Accepted Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Non-communicating hydrocephalus * Structural lesion on MRI or CT (tumour, contusion, aneurysm) * mini-mental state examination test \< 10 points * Life-expectancy shorter than 1 year * Pre-existing other type of dementia (m. Alzheimer, vascular dementia) * Surgery lasting more than 120 minutes * Blood loss more than 500 ml * Adverse events during general anesthesia: mean arterial pressure \< 60 mm Hg more than 5 minutes, arrythmia with need for pharmacological treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of patient's state3 monthComparison of mini-mental state examination, gait (measured by 5-meter-walking) test a self-assessment made by patient between both group (telemetric prechamber impanted versus not implanted)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison in radiological findings1 yearComparison of size of brain ventricles on brain CT examination at the end of follow-up between both groups
Comparison in number of valve setting1 yearComparison in number of valve setting between both groups
Comparison of difference in valve settings1 yearComparison of difference in valve settings - between pressure set in time of implantation and at the end of follow up

Countries

Czechia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026