Skip to content

Correlation Between Imatinib Trough Concentration and Efficacy in Advanced GIST Patients with Different Genotypes

Correlation Between Imatinib Trough Concentration and Efficacy in Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Patients with Different Genotypes

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06628739
Enrollment
168
Registered
2024-10-08
Start date
2017-07-01
Completion date
2023-05-31
Last updated
2024-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor, Malignant

Brief summary

Imatinib (IM) has significantly enhanced the prognosis of patients (pts) with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The clinical outcomes may correlate with IM exposure. However, the efficacy threshold, particularly based on different primary KIT mutant, remains undefined. The objective of this study is to establish the efficacy threshold of imatinib (IM) plasma trough concentration (Cmin) at steady-state in Chinese patients with advanced GIST, additionally to define subgroup thresholds based on various primary KIT mutations.

Detailed description

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. The majority of GIST are driven by activating mutuations of KIT (60-70%) or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA, 10-15%), in which KIT exon 11 mutation (52-58%) and KIT exon 9 mutation (6-9%) are the most common types of KIT mutations. Patients with different activating KIT mutations have different sensitivity to imatinib therapy. In the first-line therapy, patients with KIT exon 11 mutation receiving Imatinib with standard dose of 400mg/d has the best therapeutic effect. Patients with KIT exon 9 mutation have poor sensitivity to the standard dose of imatinib, while higher doses can lead to better outcomes. The clinical outcomes may correlate with IM exposure. However, the efficacy threshold of imatinib in Chinese patients with advanced GIST remains unclear. The investigators aim to establish the efficacy threshold of imatinib plasma trough concentration (Cmin) at steady-state in Chinese patients with advanced GIST, additionally to define subgroup thresholds based on various primary KIT mutations.

Interventions

DRUGImatinib

The long-term maintenance dose of every patient was determined by the physician based on the guidelines and the patients' individual conditions such as adverse reactions.

Sponsors

First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically confirmed metastatic or recurrent GIST * Aged 18 or older * Treated with imatinib as first-line therapy * Had imatinib Cmin measurement at steady state(at least one month after treatment) ≥2 times under long-term maintenance dose of regular medication * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) of 0 to 2

Exclusion criteria

* Poor appliance * Important treatment data missing * Combined use of CYP enzyme inducers or inhibitors, such as rifampicin, carbamazepine, ketoconazole, ritonavir, rifamequal

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression free survivalthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearProgression free survival (PFS) was defined as time from initiation of imatinib treatment until disease progression, as assessed by Choi criteria, or death caused by any reason.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
objective response ratethrough study completion, an average of 1 yearObjective response rate (ORR) was defined as rate of Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR).
Overall survivalthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearOverall survival (OS) was defined as time from initiation of imatinib treatment until death caused by any reason.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026