Skip to content

WHITBY: Working Towards Better Healthcare Interventions for Tinnitus: a Brain Stimulation studY

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Tinnitus - Effects of Multiple Treatment Sessions: a Randomised-controlled Pilot Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06628414
Acronym
WHITBY
Enrollment
40
Registered
2024-10-08
Start date
2024-12-01
Completion date
2026-09-01
Last updated
2026-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tinnitus

Keywords

tinnitus, brain stimulation, neuromodulation, transcranial direct current stimulation

Brief summary

Tinnitus - the awareness of sound without any outside source - affects around 15% of people and can cause anxiety and depression. Treatment options are limited and do not address tinnitus directly (e.g., reduce its loudness). To do that, we must change brain activity causing tinnitus. Low-dose electrical stimulation, using a technique called transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), is a promising approach. The technique is safe and easy to administer. Several small studies have tested tDCS for tinnitus showing some benefits. To assess whether these benefits will generalise to other patients, we need to conduct a randomised controlled trial - a large, rigorously controlled experiment based on prior agreed procedures. Clinical trials are expensive and time-consuming to run and thus require meticulous pilot work to establish the most effective treatment regimens and the most sensitive measures of treatment outcome. The current study aims to provide such pilot information for a clinical trial of tDCS treatment of tinnitus. Using a total of 40 patients, we will establish how to best to administer tDCS and measure resulting changes in tinnitus perception and associated brain activity. The current study is a crucial first step towards determining whether or not tDCS can effectively treat tinnitus.

Interventions

DEVICEtranscranial Direct Current Stimulation

transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Sponsors

University of Nottingham
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Statistician

Intervention model description

Double-blind, parallel, randomised, sham-controlled pilot trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18 or over * Suffering from subjective idiopathic tinnitus * Sufficient understanding of English to be able to provide informed consent * Able to safely undergo tDCS

Exclusion criteria

* Aged under 18 * Not suffering from tinnitus or suffering from objective tinnitus * Insufficient understanding of English to be able to provide informed consent * Unable to safely undergo tDCS as assessed by tDCS Safety Questionnaire * Having taken part in a research study in the last 3 months involving invasive procedures or an inconvenience allowance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proof of conceptAssessed at study end (anticipated as 1 year after study start)Measured by protocol compliance and attrition

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tinnitus symptom severityBefore first intervention session, after final intervention session and at 3-month follow-upMeasured by Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI); maximum score: 100, higher score indicates greater tinnitus symptom severity
Tinnitus loudnessBefore first intervention session, after each intervention session and at 3-month follow-up (VAS). Before first intervention session and after final intervention session (loudness matching)Measured by 10-point visual analogue scale, higher score indicates higher tinnitus loudness and by audiometric tinnitus loudness matching, with higher dB indicating higher loudness
DepressionBefore first intervention session, after final intervention session and at 3-month follow-upMeasured by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores can range from 0 to 27 with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms
AnxietyBefore first intervention session, after final intervention session and at 3-month follow-upMeasured by Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7) scored from 0 to 21, with a higher score indicating more severe anxiety
Treatment satisfactionAfter final intervention session and at 3-month follow-upMeasured by Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS) scores can range from 0 to 28 with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction
Adverse effectsAfter each intervention session (10 sessions over 2 weeks)Measured by in-house adverse effects questionnaire without numerical scoring system.
Electrophysiological brain activityBefore first intervention session and after final intervention session (1st and 10th of 10 sessions over 2 weeks)..Spontaneous oscillatory and auditory-evoked brain activity and coherence will be measured using 32-channel EEG. We will acquire basic structural brain images on a subset of 10 representative subjects to test the feasibility of creating individualised head models for EEG source imaging and tDCS current flow modelling.

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

CONTACTMagdalena Sereda, PhD
magdalena.sereda@nottingham.ac.uk00441158232625
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMagdalena Sereda, PhD

University of Nottingham

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026