Skip to content

Randomized Trial of SGLT2i in Heart Transplant Recipients

Randomized Trial of Sodium-glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibition in Heart Transplant Recipients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06625073
Enrollment
200
Registered
2024-10-03
Start date
2026-01-20
Completion date
2030-02-28
Last updated
2026-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Disease, Heart Transplant, Kidney Disease

Keywords

Heart Transplant, Empagliflozin, Safety and Tolerability, Kidney Outcomes, Cardiometabolic Outcomes, Erythropoiesis, Functional Status, Quality of Life

Brief summary

Heart transplant (HTx) is an established therapy for advanced heart disease that restores quality of life and improves survival. However, due to preexisting comorbidities combined with the immunosuppressive therapies required after transplantation, HTx recipients remain at high risk for kidney, cardiovascular (CV), and metabolic disease. Large randomized clinical trials have recently shown that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have potent kidney protective and CV benefits in many populations of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), CV disease and/or diabetes. SGLT2i have not been studied prospectively in HTx recipients, which represents a barrier to their use in this population. In this multicenter randomized controlled trial in Veterans with HTx, investigators will evaluate the potential benefits of empagliflozin on kidney function, cardiometabolic risk, erythropoiesis, and functional status. A total of 200 Veterans will be randomly assigned to receive either empagliflozin 10 mg daily or a matching placebo for 12 months.

Detailed description

Heart transplant (HTx) markedly improves patient health-related quality of life (hrQoL) and survival in advanced heart failure (HF). However, HTx recipients remain at elevated risk for kidney and cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. Mitigating the negative effects of these morbidities on long-term survival and on patient hrQoL after HTx is a critical unmet need. Large clinical trials have recently shown that sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have potent kidney protective and CV benefits. By preventing glucose reabsorption in the renal proximal tubule and promoting glycosuria, SGLT2i trigger multiple downstream effects, including improvement in insulin sensitivity and in mitochondrial efficiency in kidney and heart. SGLT2i also modulate sympathetic activity, improve endothelial function and reduce inflammation, with resultant improvement in myocardial and vascular function. SGLT2i increase erythropoietin levels and improve iron utilization. HTx is often complicated by development of chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes mellitus (T2D), anemia, and CV events, especially cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Although SGLT2i may significantly reduce development of these complications, prospective studies of SGLT2i did not include transplant recipients, leaving an important knowledge gap. HTx recipients could derive particularly significant benefits from SGLT2i therapy. The investigators hypothesize that SGLT2i with empagliflozin in HTx recipients will result in beneficial effects on kidney function, cardiometabolic risk, erythropoiesis and functional status, and that SGLT2i use in this population will be safe and well tolerated. The specific aims of this study are: Specific Aim 1. Investigate the effects of SGLT2i with empagliflozin on kidney function in HTx recipients. Kidney disease after HTx is a potent predictor of mortality. Investigators hypothesize that treatment with empagliflozin will preserve kidney function after HTx. Aim 1a. Assess the effects of SGLT2i on urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR). Albuminuria, represented by UACR and an independent predictor of kidney outcomes, was consistently reduced by SGLT2i in the landmark trials of SGLT2i. Approximately 50% of Veterans after HTx have at least moderate albuminuria. Investigators hypothesize that empagliflozin therapy will decrease albuminuria in HTx recipients. Aim 1b. Assess the effect of SGLT2i on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). SGLT2i therapy was associated with significantly slower decline of eGFR in all SGLT2i clinical trials of CKD. Investigators hypothesize that empagliflozin treatment will result in an improvement of eGFR slope in HTx recipients. Specific Aim 2. Establish the safety and tolerability of SGLT2i therapy in HTx recipients. SGLT2i have been tested prospectively in \>75,000 patients and demonstrated a favorable safety profile. Exclusion of organ transplant recipients from these trials resulted in an important knowledge gap-the lack of safety and tolerability data in this population, which limits clinicians' use of SGLT2i in HTx recipients. Investigators hypothesize that treatment with empagliflozin in HTx recipients will be associated with favorable safety and tolerability. Specific Aim 3. Evaluate the cardiometabolic, erythropoietic and functional effects of SGLT2i after HTx. Cardiometabolic risks in HTx recipients contribute to CAV, graft failure, functional limitations and mortality. Investigators hypothesize that empagliflozin therapy will result in favorable cardiometabolic, erythropoietic and functional effects. Aim 3a. Assess the effects of SGLT2i on markers of cardiometabolic risk. Investigators will examine the effect of empagliflozin on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), body weight and blood pressure (BP), inflammation and on cardiac allograft health assessed through cardiac imaging and cardiac biomarkers. Investigators hypothesize that empagliflozin therapy will result in favorable cardiometabolic effects. Aim 3b. Assess the effects of SGLT2i on erythropoiesis. SGLT2i stimulates erythropoiesis, but the exact mechanisms are not well understood. Investigators hypothesize that empagliflozin will result in an increase in serum erythropoietin and amelioration of anemia in HTx recipients. Aim 3c. Assess the effects of SGLT2i on functional status and health-related quality of life. SGLT2i have improved functional status and hrQoL in non-transplant populations. Investigators hypothesize that the favorable kidney, cardiometabolic and erythropoietic effects of empagliflozin after HTx will result in a corresponding increase in six-minute walk test (6MWT) and hrQoL after transplant.

Interventions

DRUGEmpagliflozin

A starting dose of empagliflozin 10 mg or matching placebo will be initiated after randomization and completion of the baseline testing. Participating subjects will remain at this dose for the whole study duration of 12 months.

DRUGPlacebo

A starting dose of empagliflozin 10 mg or matching placebo will be initiated after randomization and completion of the baseline testing. Participating subjects will remain at this dose for the whole study duration of 12 months.

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

All subjects will be randomized to either empagliflozin 10 mg daily for 12 months or matching placebo. The subjects and the investigators will not know whether subjects are randomized to active arm (empagliflozin) or to control arm (placebo).

Intervention model description

Empagliflozin 10 ng daily for 12 months

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18 years or older 2. Heart transplant recipient, 3 months after transplant

Exclusion criteria

1. eGFR \<20 mL/min/1.73m2 2. Type 1 diabetes mellitus 3. HbA1C \>10% 4. Baseline UACR \<30 mg/g in patients without T2D 5. Known allergy or intolerance to SGLT2i 6. Active uncontrolled infection 7. Multiorgan transplant 8. SGLT2i treatment in the last 30 days 9. Pregnancy, breast-feeding or woman of child-bearing age not on birth control

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR)12 monthsUACR difference (mg/g) in subjects in active arm vs control arm
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]12 monthsAdverse and serious adverse events difference in active arm vs control arm

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)12 monthseGFR difference (mL/min/1.73m2) in subjects in active arm vs control arm
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)12 monthsHbA1c difference (%) in subjects in active arm vs control arm
Fasting blood glucose12 monthsFasting blood glucose difference (mg/dL) in subjects in active arm vs control arm
Body weight12 monthsBody weight difference (kg) in subjects in active arm vs control arm
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure12 monthsSystolic and diastolic blood pressure difference (mmHg) in subjects in active arm vs control arm
Serum high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)12 monthsSerum hsCRP difference (mg/L) in subjects in active arm vs control arm
Serum N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NTproBNP)12 monthsSerum NTproBNP difference (pg/mL) in subjects in active arm vs control arm
Hemoglobin12 monthsHemoglobin difference (g/dl) in subjects in active arm vs control arm
Serum erythropoietin12 monthsSerum erythropoietin difference (mU/mL) in active arm vs control arm
Hematocrit12 monthsHematocrit difference (%) in active arm vs control arm
Serum transferrin saturation12 monthsSerum transferrin saturation difference (%) in active arm vs control arm
Six Minute Walk Test12 monthsDifference in distance (m) covered in the 6 minute walk test in active arm vs control arm
Serum high sensitivity Troponin12 monthsSerum high sensitivity Troponin difference (pg/mL) in subjects in active arm vs control arm
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-1212 monthsKansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 overall summary score difference in active arm vs control arm. Scale range 0-100. Higher result is better.
Serum tumor necrosis factor -a (TNF-a)12 monthsTNF-a difference (pg/mL) in subjects in active arm vs control arm
Serum interleukin 6 (IL-6)12 monthsIL-6 difference (pg/mL) in subjects in active arm vs control arm
Serum interleukin 1b(IL-1b)12 monthsIL-1b difference (pg/mL) in subjects in active arm vs control arm

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTHeather Hanson, AAS BS
Heather.Hanson@va.gov(801) 582-1565
CONTACTJosef Stehlik, MD MPH
josef.stehlik@va.gov(801) 582-1565
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJosef Stehlik, MD MPH

VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026