Skip to content

Assessing Weight Bias Among Turkish Dietitians

Assessing Weight Bias Among Turkish Dietitians: Determinants and Impact on Professional Practice

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06624111
Enrollment
411
Registered
2024-10-02
Start date
2021-08-10
Completion date
2021-11-30
Last updated
2024-10-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Weight Bias, Weight Stigma

Keywords

obesity, weight bias, weight stigma, fat-phobia, dietitian

Brief summary

The objective of this study was to examine weight bias among Turkish dietitians. and to investigate the effect of the patient's weight status on the dietitian's assessment and dietetic practice.

Detailed description

The dietitians were randomly assigned to an online case study with lactose intolerance, with all patient information identical except for the patient's weight and photograph. In one case there was a photograph of a woman with obesity and in the other a woman of normal weight. The objective of the case study was to evaluate how the body weight of a patient who consulted a dietitian for a reason unrelated to the body weight affected professional practices.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
CollaboratorOTHER
Ezgi Bellikci Koyu
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL

Inclusion criteria

* Dietitians working in Turkiye

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Differences between dietitians' lifestyle recommendations among groups.BaselineDietitians' recommendations lifestyle recommendations (such as dietary intake of energy and macronutrients) were assessed using a 5-point Likert-type scale (1; should be greatly reduced, 5; should be greatly increased).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Differences between the biochemical status rated by dietitians between groupsBaselineDietitians rated the biochemical status of the case with a 5-point Likert type scale (1; very good, 5; very poor).
Differences between the diet quality rated by dietitians between groupsBaselineDietitians rated the diet quality of the case with a 5-point Likert type scale (1; very good, 5; very poor).
Differences between dietatians' expectations regarding the patient's adherence to the diet between groupsBaselineDietatians' expectations regarding the patient's adherence to the diet were assessed using the statements the patient is willing to be treated, the patient is expected to comply with the treatment recommendations, the patient will be successful in making dietary changes, the patient will be able to sustain recommendations, the patient understood treatment recommendations. A 5-point Likert type scale (1; strongly disagree, 5; strongly agree) was used to rate these statements.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026