Skip to content

Extensive Resection of Malignant Brain Tumors Using Advanced Imaging Techniques

Multimodal Image-guided Resection of IDH Wildtype Glioblastoma and Grade IV IDH-mutant Astrocytoma

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06623565
Acronym
NEXTFRONTIER
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-10-02
Start date
2024-04-01
Completion date
2027-04-30
Last updated
2024-10-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Astrocytoma, IDH-Mutant, Grade 4, Glioblastoma

Keywords

multimodal imaging, high grade glioma, glioblastoma, supramarginal, resection, surgery

Brief summary

Rationale: Patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma or grade IV IDH-mutant astrocytoma have a very poor prognosis despite standard treatment consisting of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Diffuse infiltration of the brain by the tumor is thought to be one of the main causes of this therapy-resistance. In order to improve the surgical treatment, tumor regions with lower infiltration percentages need to be identified and resected during surgery, a so-called supramarginal resection. Currently, pre-operative T1 contrast enhanced weighted (T1c) MRI is used to identify the tumor for resection. We recently found the combination of apparent diffusion coefficient MRI and O-(2-\[ 18F\]fluoroethyl-)-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography (ADC/FET) to be significantly more accurate than T1c MRI alone in the detection of tumor infiltration. This makes ADC/FET a suitable candidate to guide supramarginal resection. Since FET PET is not as accessible and widely available as MRI, identification of an MRI based alternative could result in a more widespread implementation. Amide proton transfer chemical exchange saturation transfer (APT-CEST) MRI is a novel potential alternative for FET PET, since both measures are related to protein content. Objective: In this project we aim to develop a safe and effective technique for ADC/FET guided resection of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma and grade IV IDH-mutant astrocytoma. The safety concerns neurological deficits and time to start of adjuvant therapy, while the effectiveness is aimed at the extent of resection. Our secondary aim is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of APT-CEST MRI and to assess whether APT-CEST MRI can serve as an alternative for FET PET for the detection of tumor infiltration. Study design: prospective observational intervention study Study population: 30 patients with clinical and radiological diagnosis of an untreated high grade glioma (suspected for glioblastoma (IDH wildtype) or grade IV astrocytoma (IDH mutant)), who are eligible for a supramarginal surgical resection and adjuvant treatment according two neurosurgeons in consensus and who are in relatively good condition (Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) ≥70). Intervention (if applicable): supramarginal ADC/FET-guided resection. To make sure that the standard treatment is always guaranteed, T1c MRI abnormalities will be included in the surgical target. Main study parameters/endpoints: the main study endpoint is the optimization of ADC/FET-guided resection. Volumetric and percentual extent of resection, as measured with MRI and PET imaging, combined with surgery-induced morbidity will be used as outcome parameters. The secondary study parameters will be the histopathology-based diagnostic accuracy of APT-CEST MRI in comparison with FET PET, cognitive performance over time and progression free survival. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: participants will undergo pre- and postoperative MRI scanning. This is also part of regular clinical care, except there are additional MRI sequences including APT CEST in the pre-operative and pre-radiotherapy MRI. There are no risks associated with MRI acquisition after MRI safety screening. Participants will furthermore undergo a pre- and postoperative FET PET. The risks associated with PET scanning are limited, and the radiation burden will remain below 10 mSv (ICRP62 category intermediate risk (level IIb)). During surgery, biopsies are performed from areas that will be resected, so these biopsies will not introduce any extra risk. A potential benefit is the possibility of the removal of more tumor tissue. A potential risk is the additional removal of healthy brain tissue with the risk of neurological damage, which is controlled by pre- and intraoperative techniques such as visualization of white matter tracts and mapping (both asleep and awake) of critical functions such as language and control of strength.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMultimodal image-guided resection

Supramarginal resection using combination of ADC MRI and FET PET

Sponsors

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * New clinical and radiological suspected diagnosis of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma or grade IV IDH-mutant astrocytoma * Visible FET PET uptake in the tumor as assessed by the nuclear physician * Indication for a surgical resection and adjuvant treatment according to the neuro oncology multidisciplinary meeting * Eligible for a supramarginal resection according to two neurosurgeons in consensus * Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) ≥ 70.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous brain surgery or cranial radiotherapy * No significant other brain pathology, in the opinion of the PI or designee, such as multiple sclerosis, neurodegenerative disease, stroke * Tumor located infratentorially or in the spinal cord * Lack of adequate social or family support needed for adherence to the further postoperative therapeutic regimen * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Extent of resectionwithin 4 weeks after surgeryVolumetric and percentual on pre-radiotherapy PET-MRI
Neurological functioning3 months after surgeryNeurological Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) score

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactNiels Verburg, MD PhD
n.verburg@amsterdamumc.nl+31204445013
Backup ContactElsmarieke van der Giessen, MD PhD
e.m.vandegiessen@amsterdamumc.nl+31204444200

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026