Skip to content

Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Positioning Accuracy and Efficiency Using a Dental Compass.

Improving TMJ Joint Positioning and Accuracy With Therapeutic Splint Fabrication Using a Dental Compass While Reducing Radiation Exposure: A Cohort Comparison

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06619574
Enrollment
80
Registered
2024-10-01
Start date
2024-11-08
Completion date
2027-08-01
Last updated
2026-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Temporomandibular Joint Syndrome

Brief summary

This study is being performed to determine if the use of the Dental Compass Articular and its software will produce therapeutic splints for TMD accurately and successfully, compare favorably with a cohort treated without the Dental Compass (for number of visits, splint modifications, and required CBCTs).

Detailed description

Standard practice in the treatment of temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD) currently involves non-radiographically-assisted manual repositioning of the jaw followed by either an in-office cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) or tomographic X-ray of both TMJs, and further adjustment as necessary to improve the initial bite impression.\[15\] At follow up visits the therapeutic splint is modified in stages to "walk" the condyle progressively into the ideal position, such as altering side shift, lateral deviation, and rotation. During this process multiple CBCTs or tomographic X-rays, and multiple direct dentist interventions, are required to find the precise joint position, involving significant radiation exposure, and significant chair time for the dentist The key advantage of using the Dental Compass Articulator in conjunction with its software, is to identify and suggest corrections for the range of orthopedic imbalances present. Software-facilitated identification of imbalances is coupled with manipulation of yaw (anterior, posterior, lateral, or rotational movement of the mandible in a horizontal plane), pitch (rotation of the mandible in a frontal vertical plane), and roll (rotation of the mandible in a lateral vertical plane) to achieve optimal condylar and mandibular position for splint manufacture. The goals of this study are to: 1. Determine if the use of the Dental Compass Articular and its software will produce therapeutic splints for TMD accurately and successfully, and will compare favorably with a cohort treated without the Dental Compass (for number of visits, splint modifications, and required CBCTs), and 2. Confirm a clinically important reduction in airway constriction and improvement in airway volume with us of the therapeutic splint.

Interventions

DEVICE3D Analysis Group

Dental Compass and Dental Compass software used for therapeutic splint fabrication

OTHERManual Analysis Cohort

Manual methods used for therapeutic splint fabrication

Sponsors

Dr. Dean Reeves Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER
Lourens A. Du Preez
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Cohort comparison study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

for prospective active participants: * TMJ dysfunction and pain * CBCT indicates a non-Gelb 4/7 position or \< 1.8 mm bone to bone interval between the mandibular condyle and mandibular fossa anteriorly or posteriorly.

Exclusion criteria

* Planning a move within 9 months. * Unwilling to provide two phone numbers and two email contacts. * Not willing to express a willingness to come in for 4-6 month follow up if they have marked improvement or improvement in symptoms. * Not living within 90-minute drive from clinic * Transportation not reliable * Involved in any other TMD study * Life threatening illness or major surgery planned * Other major life stress that might interfere with completing the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of clinic visits3-6 monthsNumber of clinic visits from initial evaluation to confirmation of final therapeutic splint provision
Number of cone beam CTs (CBCTs)3-6 monthsNumber of CBCTs obtained from initial evaluation to confirmation of final therapeutic splint provision
Number of splint modifications3-6 monthsNumber of splint modifications obtained from initial evaluation to confirmation of final therapeutic splint provision

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gelb 4/7 position achieved during treatment (3D group only)3-6 monthsYes or no for Gelb 4/7 position
Anterior joint space of 1.8 mm or more achieved during treatment (3D group only)3-6 monthsYes or no for anterior joint space of 1.8 mm or more
Posterior joint space of 1.8 mm or more achieved during treatment (3D group only)3-6 monthsYes or no for posterior joint space of 1.8 mm or more
Improvement in total airway volume3-6 monthsChange in total airway volume from use of TMJ splint
Improvement in minimum airway diameter3-6 monthsChange in total airway volume from use of TMJ splint

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTKenneth D Reeves, MD
deanreevesMD@gmail.com9139637750
CONTACTLourens A duPreez, MDT, HDDT
lourensdupreez903@gmail.com940-580-9486
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKenneth D Reeves, MD

K. Dean Reeves, M.D., P.A.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 27, 2026