Skip to content

Advanced Practice Nurses for Fall Incidence PrevenTion in Very Old Robust Adults

Advanced Practice Nurses for Fall Incidence PrevenTion in Robust Very Old Adults: Protocol for the APN-FIT Hybrid Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06617806
Acronym
APN-FIT
Enrollment
386
Registered
2024-09-27
Start date
2024-10-15
Completion date
2027-10-31
Last updated
2024-11-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced Practice Nursing, Autonomy of Older People, Fall Prevention, Frail Elderly

Keywords

Fall prevention, Aging, Frailty - robustness, Advanced practice nurses, Very old adults

Brief summary

APN-FIT is a hybrid type 1 clinical trial comparing the effect of an APN delivered fall prevention programme with standard care in non-frail patients. All participants will receive a full geriatric assessment at enrolment and, on a voluntary basis, physical activity programmes during the 12-month period. Falls occurring during the study will be recorded at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 months after enrolment. An ancillary study will specifically examine implementation outcomes of the tested intervention.

Detailed description

Introduction and objectives The 2020s witnessed the emergence of Advanced Practice Nurses (APN) as a novel paramedical profession in France, bolstering the primary care workforce and service landscape. These nurses are expected to reinforce various dimensions of primary care, including therapeutic education, prevention, screening, and clinical and therapeutic follow-up of patients. There is a need regarding the evaluation of APN led intervention in the prevention of falls in non-frail elderly. APN-FIT is a pragmatic, hybrid type 1, multicenter, randomized open-label superiority trial addressing this question. The study population will include primary care patients aged over 80 years old, classified as vigorous (according to Clinical Frailty Scale) and able to follow a tailored intervention program. The study will be conducted in seven local primary-care centers in the Pays de la Loire region of France. Preselection will be done by GPs and APNs, recruitment will be done by APNs in their local caregiving center. APNs will perform a complete comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) for each participant at enrolment, followed by a detailed analysis of the resulting data and the emission of a panel of recommendation. A 1:1 randomization of participants will be conducted using a random block size ranging from 4 to 6, stratified by APN. All participants will benefit from a CGA at inclusion and M12. A home-based physical activity program, over a period of 7 weeks, with twice-weekly sessions (45 min each), will also be proposed to all participants. In the intervention group, each APN will schedule follow-ups at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-inclusion. Each participant will be contacted every two months (i.e 2,4,6,8,10 onths) by the research assistant or nurse for data collection on falls and secondary outcome criteria in a blinded approach. All participants will be assessed for a new CGA at M12 by a research nurse. Quantitative main analysis The primary outcome is the number of falls recorded at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include: * Number of falls and severe falls as defined by the World Fall Guidelines at each time point * Level of independence, evaluated by Katz' index and Lawton's instrumental activities of daily living * Level of healthcare utilization * Level of emergency care service utilization * Frailty measured with the Clinical Frailty Scale and ICOPE monitor score * Cognitive performance * Mental health status * Nutritional status * Quality of life evaluated by EQ-5D-5L A cost-utility analysis (CUA) will be conducted, from a collective perspective and one-year time horizon. Ancillary study of implementation An ancillary study will be conducted to facilitate a deeper understanding of the efficacy elements observed in the main study. Its purpose is to determine optimal implementation conditions for practical deployment in the field. The data collection for this ancillary study is primarily opportunistic, coinciding with the data collection necessary to address the main study's primary objective. The indicators described by Proctor and colleagues will be used for the evaluation : acceptability, relevance, adoption, efficiency, feasibility, fidelity, scope and sustainability. The implementation will undergo evaluation at patient level and healthcare provider level. Individual and group interviews will be conducted. Discourse saturation will be sought. The survey of professionals will occur during initial observations and focus groups. The data analysis will draw from the sociology of professions. A sequential thematic analysis of discourse and a visual examination of non-verbal communication elements and social interactions will be used to capture factors that facilitate or limit program implementation.

Interventions

OTHERFollow-up by the Advanced Practice Nurse

At each follow-up (FU), the recommendations of an APN may include : * Referral to a specialized memory assessment in case of cognitive impairment * Psychological FU in the event that APN detects any mood complaints * Ophthalmological and/or ear, nose, and throat consultation if any auditory or visual difficulties is observed * Compression stockings use if orthostatic hypotension is present * Nutritional counseling, with particular emphasis on the intake of protein, in combination with long-term assessment of weight * Supplementation with vitamin D and calcium based to prevent osteoporosis in older adults, especially those at risk of recurrent falls * Proposal of a standardized and personalized physical activity program * Evaluation of medication therapies, especially antipsychotics, blood pressure medication or broad anticholinergics. The STOPPFall tool will be also proposed and coordinated by APN in accordance with the patient's physician * A comprehensive social evaluative approach

Sponsors

Pôle Fédératif de Soins Primaires (https://dmg.univ-nantes.fr/c/pole-federatif)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Université de Nantes
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Nantes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Pragmatic randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
80 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 80 or over; * Vigorous according to the Clinical Frailty Scale (scores 1, 2, 3) ; * Having a referring primary care physician working in pairs with the local Advanced Practice Nurse; * affiliated to a Health Care Plan * Informed and having signed consent to participate in the research.

Exclusion criteria

* Under guardianship or trusteeship; * Unable to travel to the primary care office or unable to follow the adapted physical activity program; * Poor understanding of French.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of falls in each group12 months after enrollment in the studyAn unexpected event in which an individual comes to rest on the ground, floor, or lower level

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of falls and severe falls at each time point2-4-6-8-10 and 12 months after inclusionSevere falls is defined by the World Fall Guidelines (2022) as fall with injuries that are severe enough to require a consultation with a physician; result in the person lying on the ground without capacity to get up for at least one hour; prompt a visit to the emergency room (ER); associated with loss of consciousness
Level of independance12 months after inclusionActivities of daily living (Katz index) and Lawton's instrumental activities of daily livng
Level of healthcare utilization12 months after inclusionNumber of consultations, utilization of dental, ophthalmological, and ear-nose-throat care during the follow-up period
Level of emergency care service utilization12 months after inclusionNumber of stays in an emergency hospitalization unit during the follow-up period.
Frailty and physical performance12 months after inclusionFrailty measured by the Clinical Frailty scale and Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) Monitor score Physical performance assessed with Timed Up and Go test and the Short Physical Performance Battery
Number of participants with malnutrition12 months after inclusionBody mass index, weight loss and Mini Nutritional Assessment
Cognitive performance and mental status12 months after inclusionMMSE (mini mental state examination) and FAB (frontal assessment battery) score for cognition. Mini-geriatric depression scale for mental health
Quality of Life12 months after inclusionEvaluated by EQ-5D-5L scale

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cost utility analysis12 months after inclusionRate of Differential Cost - Utility
Implementation outcomes of the intervention12 months after the end of the study* Acceptability: Perception, among caregivers, that a given treatment, service, practice, or innovation is satisfactory * Relevance: Perception of the adequacy of the innovation to address a particular question or problem * Adoption: Intention, initial decision, or action to try or use an innovation * Efficiency: Assess the price that society is willing to pay to guarantee the health gain associated with the intervention * Feasibility: The extent to which an innovation can be successfully implemented within a given organization * Fidelity: The degree to which an intervention has been implemented as prescribed in the original protocol * Scope: Number of people affected by an intervention and their representativeness of the target population * Permanence: The presence of continuity beyond the study regarding the health benefits for the population related to the intervention and the means put in place to ensure it

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactLaure DE DECKER, MD - Pr
laure.dedecker@chu-nantes.fr02.40.08.79.20
Backup ContactCédric RAT, MD - Pr
cedric.rat@univ-nantes.fr

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026