ILD
Conditions
Keywords
Chronic breathlessness, ILD, high nasal flow canula
Brief summary
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of high-flow nasal therapy (HFNT) oxygen compared to long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) on dyspnea and quality of life in intersititial lung disease patients with chronic respiratory failure and persistent breathlessness in whom LTOT has already been initiated.
Detailed description
The study will be a non-blinded, two-arm, crossover (2 periods of 2 weeks each), randomised controlled superiority multicentre trial comparing the effect of HFNT on persistent dyspnoea in intersititial lung disease patients with chronic respiratory failure as compared to LTOT over a two-week period. The oxygen flow rate with HFNT will be the same as for usual care. The HFNT will be used during the night and during the 3-minute chair rise test, it can be used during the day depending on the patient's needs. During the rest of the time, the LTOT will be used as in usual care. Participants will be randomised to receive (1) 2 weeks of LTOT then 2 weeks of LTOT+HFNT or (2) 2 weeks of LTOT+HFNT then 2 weeks of LTOT. The investigators will determine the effect of HFNT on quality of life and dyspnoea. The investigators will also study the effect of HFNT on secondary outcomes listed below. Each assessment will be performed at the end of each 2-week period. Polysomnography will be optional. The study will be conducted in 42 patients with LTOT suffering from persistent breathlessness. With a total sample of 38 patients and a crossover design, if the real difference on the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is 6, the standard deviation of the matched difference is 12.5 and the significance threshold is 5%, a two-tailed Student's t test will have a power of 80% to conclude that the difference is significantly different from 0 (Calculated using PASS 14.0.14, Analysis of a cross-over design using difference).These hypotheses are based on the values observed in the article by Nagata et al. (PMID: 29283682), in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseaes of the same severity, which reported an improvement in the SGRQ-s of -10.8 (95% CI: -15.3; -6.3, i.e. SD of 12.4) with HFNT administered at night for 6 weeks versus LTOT Another study (PMID: 31308647) reported an improvement of -11.9 (CI95% -17.2; -6.6) after an introduction of HFNT. As the minicmal clinical improvement difference for SGRQ is 4, a difference of 6 is considered was both realistic and clinically relevant. A Student's t test allows a conservative approach compared to the use of a linear mixed-effects model retained for the analysis of the primary endpoint. To take account of reduced precision due to possible loss of follow-up or study withdrawals, the sample was increased by 10%, i.e. 42 patients: 21 in the HFNT+LTOT then LTOT sequence and 21 in the LTOT then HFNT+LTOT sequence.
Interventions
Usual care with LTOT for 2 weeks
High Flow Nasal delivered by myAirvo3 (4 hours minimum and during th 3-minute chair rise test, 30L/min, 34°C, identical O2 flow rate as LTOT) for 2 weeks
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Intertitial lung disease * Persistant dyspnea (mMRC≥3) * Long-term oxygen therapy at least for 3 months
Exclusion criteria
* Chronic respiratory disease (COPD, lung cancer) * Pneumothorax, * Pneumomediastinum, * Active smoker, * Patient on non-invasive ventilation or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), * Pregnancy or breastfeeding, * Unable to read or understand questionnaires, * No written consent, * Patients under guardianship, * No health assurance coverage
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| SGRQ questionnaire : Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (symptom component) | 2 weeks | Symptom component of SGRQ : Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more limitations. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Dyspnea assessement : mMRC: Modified Medical Research Council | 2 weeks | mMRC score : range frome 0 (low) to 4(high) and assesses the intensity of dyspnea |
| Dyspnea assessement : MDP: Multidimensional dyspnea profile | 2 weeks | * Immediate affective score range from 0 to 10 with higher score indicating worse breathlessness * Sensory score range from 0 to 50 with higher score indicating worse breathlessness * Emotional score range from 0 to 50 with higher score indicating worse breathlessness |
| Sleep Quality only in patients for whom nocturnal polysomnography is performed during one night (optional) | 2 weeks | Sleep duration (minutes) |
| Quality of life (SGRQ questionnaire) : S.George's Respiratory Questionnaire | 2 weeks | * Total score range from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating more limitations * Activity subscore range from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating more limitations * Impact sub-score range from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating more limitations |
| Quality of life (K-Bild) : The King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (KBILD) questionnaire | 2 weeks | Total score range from 0 to 100 with lower score indicating more limitations |
| Quality of life questionnaire (SF12): Short Form 12 | 2 weeks | Total score range from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating more limitations |
| Anxiety-depression (HADS) : Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale | 2 weeks | * Anxiety sub-score range from 0 to 21 with higher score indicating more severe anxiety * Depression sub-scorerange from 0 to 21 with higher score indicating more severe depression |
| Distance at 6-minutes walk test | 2 weeks | Length in meters |
| Dyspnea (Borg score) at the 6-minutes walk test | 2 weeks | Score range from 0 to 10 with higher score indicating worst breathlessness |
| Number of rise at the 3-minutes rise chair test | 2 weeks | Number of rise |
| Dyspnea assessement : dyspnoea-12 | 2 weeks | Dyspnea-12 score range from 0 to 36, with higher score indicating worse breathlessness |
| Nocturnal capnography | 2 weeks | Mean PtcCO2 |
| Respiratory rate | Over 2 weeks | * Mean day-time respiratory rate measured by a wearable tele-monitoring device (breaths/min) * Mean night-time respiratory rate measured by a wearable tele-monitoring device (breaths/min) |
| Heart rate | Over 2 weeks | * Mean day-time heart rate measured by a wearable tele-monitoring device (beats/min) * Mean night-time heart rate measured by a wearable tele-monitoring device (beats/min) |
| SpO2 | Over 2 weeks | * Mean day-time SpO2 measured by a wearable tele-monitoring device (%) * Mean night-time SpO2 measured by a wearable tele-monitoring device (%) |
| Rest | Over 2 weeks | Mean daily rest hours measured by a wearable tele-monitoring device (hours/day) |
| Activity | Over 2 weeks | Mean daily walking hours measured by a wearable tele-monitoring device (hours/day) |
| Acute exacerbation and/or increase in resting oxygen flow | 2 weeks | Number of patients with (i) an acute exacerbation defined as the onset or acute worsening of dyspnoea, associated with an increase in radiological lesions (new ground-glass opacities and/or bilateral condensations) not explained by heart failure or overload, or (ii) an increase in resting oxygen flow of more than 2 L/min (on medical prescription). |
| HFNT(High Flow Nasal Therapy) compliance | 2 weeks | * Average daily hours of use of the HFNT device * Average daily hours of use of LTOT |
| HFNT (High Flow Nasal Therapy) acceptability | 2 weeks | Side effects |
| Dyspnea (Borg score) at the 3-minutes rise chair test | 2 weeks | Score range from 0 to 10 with higher score indicating worst breathlessness |