Skip to content

Immersive v/s Non-immersive Virtual Reality in Enhancing Upper Limb Functions Among Individuals With Subacute Stage Hemiplegia

Immersive Versus Non-immersive Virtual Reality in Enhancing Upper Limb Functions Among Individuals With Subacute Stage Hemiplegia - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06615141
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-09-26
Start date
2024-03-05
Completion date
2025-01-05
Last updated
2024-09-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemiplegia and/or Hemiparesis Following Stroke

Keywords

virtual reality, hemiplegic stroke, Oculus Quest 3, Motor function, Upper limb

Brief summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness of immersive virtual reality combined with conventional therapy to the effectiveness of non-immersive virtual reality combined with conventional therapy in enhancing upper limb function in subacute hemiplegic stroke patients.

Detailed description

The study is a single blinded randomized controlled trial in which the assessor will be blinded. Male and female participants aged between 28-55 years are included in the study. Participants are selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and are later randomly assigned to Group 1 and Group 2. Group 1 - Conventional therapy and Immersive Virtual Reality Group 2 - Conventional therapy and Non-Immersive Virtual Reality Primary Outcome measures include the Fugl Meyer Assessment for Upper limb and Graded Wolf Motor Function test for upper limb. Secondary Outcome measure is the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL) Questionnaire. Therapy session starts with 15 minutes of stretching and strengthening exercises of the affected arm followed by 45 minutes of Immersive / Non Immersive virtual reality training. Follow up assessment is done 6 weeks post intervention. The baseline assessment score and follow up assessment scores will be compared.

Interventions

DEVICEOculus Quest 3

Oculus quest 3 is a standalone virtual reality headset developed by Meta. It offers precise motion tracking and offers an innovative intervention for stroke rehabilitation, enhancing upper limb motor function throug task - specific exercises.

DEVICENeofect Smartboard and Tyromotion Myro

Neofect Smart Board provides non-immersive VR rehabilitation through gamified, task specific exercises to improve upper limb mobility in an interactive way. Tyromotion Myro uses non-immersive VR therapy combining sensor-based feedback and interactive games to enhance fine motor skills.

Sponsors

Gulf Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
28 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Individuals aged 28-55 years. * Diagnosed with hemiplegia due to stroke. * ≤ Grade 2 on Modified Ashworth scale. * ≤ Stage 2 on Brunnstrom stages of motor recovery. * Score of ≥ 35/36 on Cognitive assessment scale for stroke patients (CASP)

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications for VR therapy, such as severe motion sickness or photosensitive epilepsy, impaired spatial awareness. * Pre-existing neurological conditions such as spinal cord injury, Multiple sclerosis and so affecting upper limb function.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper extremity (FMA-UE)From enrollment to the end treatment at 6 weeksA valid, reliable, and comprehensive measurement tool with an intra-rater reliability of ICC 0.96 and interrater reliability of ICC 0.98, used to evaluate motor impairment, balance, sensation, and joint function in the upper extremities after stroke.
Graded Wolf Motor function test - The WMFTFrom enrollment to the end treatment at 6 weeksThis test is designed to assess motor function, strength, and coordination in individuals with upper extremity impairments. It is a reliable measure with inter-rater reliability of 0.97 and intra-rater reliability of 0.90.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL)From enrollment to the end treatment at 6 weeksThe SS-QOL scale is widely used for assessing the health-related quality of life in stroke survivors. It has a good test-retest reliability, with ICC ranging from 0.80-0.90. It is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the quality of life in stroke patients.

Countries

United Arab Emirates

Contacts

Primary ContactAthira George, MPT
2022mpt09@mygmu.ac.ae+971503723635
Backup ContactDr.Satheeskumar Durairaj
satheeskumar@gmu.ac.ae+971 55 1808474

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026