Skip to content

Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Pilot Study

Continuous Intraoperative Glucose Monitoring: A Pilot Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06614127
Enrollment
45
Registered
2024-09-26
Start date
2024-10-24
Completion date
2026-10-30
Last updated
2026-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia

Keywords

Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Electrocautery

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate connectivity of the FDA approved DexCom G7® continuous glucose monitor in the operating room. Continuous glucose monitors are applied to the skin and a thin sampling filament is inserted into the skin and measures blood sugar in the interstitial fluid. The DexCom G7® is used regularly outside of the operating room to monitor blood sugar, however the use of the device in the operating room environment has been limited by connectivity issues. This study will assess device connectivity at different monitoring sites.

Detailed description

This feasibility pilot study will assess connectivity of the DexCom G7® continuous glucose monitoring device (CGM) in the operating room environment at different locations on the body. The investigators believe device connectivity is affected by use of electrocautery. The monitoring sites were selected to limit electromagnetic interference from electrocautery. One cohort will have the CGM device placed on the deltoid and the electrodispersive pad placed on the thigh and the other cohort will have the CGM device placed on the thigh with the electrodispersive pad on the opposite thigh. Study personnel will note when electrocautery is used throughout the surgery and observe if the DexCom G7® continues to maintain connectivity with the receiver and provides a glucose reading. Comparing the timing of electrocautery use with connectivity to the DexCom G7® receiver provides important insight to the relationship between electrocautery and device connectivity. The CGM readings will solely be used for feasibility purposes for this study and not for determining interventions for the subjects.

Interventions

DEVICEDexcom G7® sensor placed in upper arm and positioned over deltoid

For the "subjects with Dexcom G7® sensor placed in the upper arm and positioned over the deltoid" cohort, study personnel will place the Dexcom G7® sensor on the subjects' deltoid and the electrodispursive pad on the thigh.

DEVICEDexcom G7® sensor placed in lateral thigh

For the "subjects with Dexcom G7® sensor place in lateral thigh" cohort, study personnel will place the Dexcom G7® sensor in the lateral thigh and the electrodispursive pad will be placed on the opposite thigh.

Sponsors

Loma Linda University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults age 18 and above able to consent for themselves * Willingness and ability to participate in study procedures * Surgery length estimated 3 hours or longer

Exclusion criteria

* Cardiothoracic surgical patients * Plan for intraoperative radiologic imaging * Patients on IV infusion of insulin prior to surgery * Anemia with hemoglobin less than 7 * Patients on hydroxyurea * Patients with known adhesive allergies * Pregnant women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effect of DexCom G7® sensor position on receiver connectivity during and after electrocautery use.Change between baseline at start of procedure and completion of procedure, up to 6 hours.Connectivity will be recorded continuously from start to finish of the procedure. The percentage of time the Dexcom G7® device remains connected during the subject's surgical case will be measured. The effect of electrocautery on CGM connectivity will be assessed by comparing the start and stop times in connectivity to the start and stop times of electrocautery. Connectivity time greater than 80% is considered highly effective. Connectivity time between 20% and 80% is considered effective. Connectivity time less than 20% is considered sub-optimal.

Countries

United States

Contacts

STUDY_CHAIRRichard L Applegate, MD

Loma Linda University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 14, 2026