Skip to content

Separation Surgery Followed by Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) Versus SABR Alone for Spinal Metastases

Separation Surgery Followed by Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy Versus Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy Alone for Spinal Metastases Invading the Spinal Canal: a Randomised, Non-inferiority Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06613295
Acronym
SABR-MESCC
Enrollment
128
Registered
2024-09-25
Start date
2022-03-07
Completion date
2027-03-01
Last updated
2024-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Solid Tumor, Spinal Neoplasms, Spinal Tumor

Brief summary

This is a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial to investigate the effect of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) compared to separation surgery followed by SABR in ambulatory patients with malignant epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). The primary objective of the project is investigating the effect of SABR compared to separation surgery followed by SABR in ambulatory patients with MESCC on retaining ambulatory function. The primary endpoint of the study is ambulatory function 3 months post treatment defined as: being able to walk 10m without aid; being able to walk 10m with aid (cane, rollator, one persons help, …); not being able to walk. Secondary outcomes are local control, progression free survival, early and late adverse effects, quality of life, effect on pain and need for reintervention. The aim is to randomise 128 patients 1:1 to either separation surgery followed by SABR (5x 8.0 Gy postoperative) (control arm) vs. SABR alone (5x 8.0 Gy) (study arm). Patients will be evaluated at 3 and 6 months after treatment with MRI scan, quality of life questionnaires, anamnestic and clinical evaluation at clinical follow ups for assessment of ambulatory function, acute and late toxicity and need for reintervention. Moreover, at 6 weeks, 12 months and 24 months after treatment a teleconsult for assessment of ambulatory function, and need for reintervention will be performed.

Detailed description

In this study, patients with malignant epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC), Bilsky grade 1c, 2 and 3 who are ambulatory with or without aid (rollator, cane, one persons help) will be treated by separation surgery followed by SABR (5x 8.0 Gy postoperative) (control arm) or SABR alone (5x 8.0 Gy) (study arm). The primary objective of the study is investigating the effect of SABR compared to separation surgery followed by SABR in ambulatory patients with MESCC on retaining ambulatory function. The primary endpoint of the study is ambulatory function 3 months post treatment defined as: being able to walk 10m without aid; being able to walk 10m with aid (cane, rollator, one persons help, …); not being able to walk. Secondary outcomes are local control, progression free survival, early and late adverse effects, quality of life, effect on pain and need for reintervention. For each participant, the study starts once written informed consent is provided and is composed by 4 study phases: a screening phase, randomisation, a treatment phase and a follow-up phase. The screening phase will allow for assessment of subject eligibility before randomisation and treatment. Demographic data, disease and spinal metastases characteristics and previous anticancer therapies will be recorded. Once all screening procedures are completed, eligibility will be determined according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Randomisation will be performed in a 1:1 ratio to the control arm (separation surgery followed by SABR) and the study arm (SABR) using an electronic randomisation tool in the eCRF. Treatment will be aimed to start as soon as possible, but certainly within 21 days after randomisation (surgery or upfront SABR). Surgical planning is done by the treating neurosurgeon in the participating center where the patient was included. Image-guided fractionated SABR using a SIB technique to the high-dose PTV will be delivered in 5 fractions of 8 Gy to a total of 40 Gy and to the conventional-dose PTV delivered simultaneously in 5 fractions of 4 Gy to a total of 20 Gy. At 6 weeks (+/-1 week) after the last RT session following information will be obtained (preferentially by digital consult): 1. Ambulatory status defined as: being able to walk 10m without aid, being able to walk 10m with aid (cane, rollator, one persons help, …), not being able to walk 2. WHO performance status 3. Acute and late toxicity assessment: as measured with CTCAE version 5.0 4. Need for re-intervention, date and type of reintervention (surgery or radiotherapy), reason (wound infection, neurologic decline, loss of ability to walk or other) 5. Pain response: VAS pain score 6. Survival data (survival status, date of death, primary cause of death) At 3 and 6 months (+/-3 weeks) after the last RT session following information will be obtained by physical or digital consult: 1. Ambulatory status defined as: being able to walk 10m without aid, being able to walk 10m with aid (cane, rollator, one persons help, …), not being able to walk 2. WHO performance status 3. Concomitant medications and systemic anticancer therapies 4. QoL according to the EORTC QLQ-C15 & BM22 questionnaires 5. Acute and late toxicity assessment: as measured with CTCAE version 5.0 7\. Need for re-intervention, date and type of reintervention (surgery or radiotherapy), reason (wound infection, neurologic decline, loss of ability to walk or other) 6. Pain response: VAS pain score 7. Physical examination: body weight 8. Local control 9. Survival data (survival status, date of death, primary cause of death) At 12 and 24 months (+/-3 weeks) after the last RT session following information will be obtained (preferentially by digital consult): 1. Ambulatory status defined as: being able to walk 10m without aid, being able to walk 10m with aid (cane, rollator, one persons help, …), not being able to walk 2. Need for re-intervention, type of reintervention 3. Survival data (survival status, date of death, primary cause of death) 4. Local control (only if information is available in medical record as per standard of care)

Interventions

RADIATIONSABR

SABR

PROCEDURESeparation surgery

Separation surgery

Sponsors

Cancer Research Antwerp
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of a solid malignant tumour (preferentially histologically proven;alternatively obtained by spinal surgical procedure) * Age 18 years or older * Histological, radiological or scintigraphical evidence of spinal metastasis (no limitation in the number of sites of metastases) * Spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) \<13 (i.e. no need for stabilisation of the spine) (see Appendix 6) * Spinal metastasis with MESCC: ESCC grade 1c, 2 and 3 (see Appendix 7) * Ambulatory: being able to walk 10m without aid or with aid (cane, rollator, one persons help). * Life expectancy estimated to be at least 3 months. * World Health Organization (WHO) Performance Status of 0-2 (some help) (see Appendix 3) * Patient has given written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Contra indication for MRI scan (e.g. pacemaker) * Previous RT or surgery at the level of the affected vertebrae * Non-solid primary tumours (e.g. lymphoma, multiple myeloma, germ cell tumours) * Non ambulatory at presentation * More than 3 affected vertebrae in one target site * More than 2 treatment sites * SINS ≥ 13 (unstable spine)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of ambulant patients at 3 months3 Months post treatmentThe ambulatory status is scored binary (without or with aid vs not being able to walk)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to loss of ambulationUp to 24 months post treatmentTime between date of study registration and date of loss of ambulation (in days)
Progression free survival (PFS)Up to 24 months post treatmentTime between date of study registration and date of local recurrence
Overall survivalUp to 24 months post treatmentTime between date of study registration and date of death of any cause or last follow-up
Local recurrence rateUp to 24 months post treatmentTime between date of study registration and date of local recurrence
Acute and late toxicityUp to 6 months post treatmentIncidence of Adverse Events as assessed by the CTCAE version 5.0
Quality of life measurement by QLQ-BM22 and QLQ-C15-PAL questionnairesUp to 6 months post treatmentDifference in QLQ-BM22 and QLQ-C15-PAL scale scores
Pain response (VAS score)Up to 6 months post treatmentImprovement by ≥ 2 points on the pain (VAS score) at the treatment site
Number of patients with re-intervention and time to re-intervention (surgery, RT, …)Up to 24 months post treatmentTime between date of treatment and date of re-intervention

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

Primary ContactCharlotte Billiet, MD, PhD
gza.cancertrials@zas.be03234433759

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026