Skip to content

Comparison of Dual-lumen Catheter-guided Mini-forceps Biopsy and Brush Cytology with Vacuum Aspiration in Suspicious Biliary Strictures

Comparison of Dual-lumen Catheter-guided Mini-forceps Biopsy and Brush Cytology with Vacuum Aspiration in Suspicious Biliary Strictures: a Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06612931
Enrollment
112
Registered
2024-09-25
Start date
2023-04-01
Completion date
2024-08-16
Last updated
2024-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Biliary Strictures, Brush Cytology, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), Miniforceps Biopsy

Brief summary

In this randomized crossover trial involving patients with indeterminate biliary strictures, we aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of the dual-lumen catheter-guided miniforceps biopsy (CMB) device with that of brush cytology under aspiration (BCA).

Interventions

PROCEDUREDual-lumen catheter-guided mini-forceps biopsy is performed first

In ERCP procedures, catheter-guided mini-forceps biopsy is performed before biliary brush cytology.

PROCEDUREBiliary brush cytology with vacuum aspiration is performed first

In ERCP procedures, biliary brush cytology with vacuum aspiration is performed before dilation catheter-guided mini-forceps biopsy.

Sponsors

Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases
CollaboratorOTHER
Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 88 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged between 18-88 years old. * Willing and able to comply with the study procedures and provide written informed consent to participate in the study. * Biliary obstructive symptoms,or indeterminate biliary stricture suspected to be intrinsic based on prior imaging.

Exclusion criteria

* Any contraindications to ERCP. * Severe cardiopulmonary disease or coagulopathy. * Biliary strictures caused by extrinsic compression. * Unwillingness or inability to provide consent. * Pregnant or breastfeeding women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The diagnostic accuracy6 monthsThe accuracy of dual-lumen catheter-guided miniforceps biopsy (CMB) and brush cytology with vacuum aspiration (BCA) in the diagnosis of biliary strictures.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the diagnostic sensitivity6 monthsThe diagnostic sensitivity of dual-lumen catheter-guided mini-forceps biopsy and brush cytology with vacuum aspiration to the suspicious biliary strictures.
The diagnostic specificity6 monthsThe diagnostic specificity of dual-lumen catheter-guided mini-forceps biopsy and brush cytology with vacuum aspiration to the suspicious biliary strictures.
Severe adverse events rates6 monthsThe incidence of adverse events, namely, post-ERCP pancreatitis, gastrointestinal perforation, and bleeding were compared.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026