Dental Caries
Conditions
Keywords
HEMA free, HEMA containing adhesive, Giomers, Giomer, USPHS criteria
Brief summary
The aim of study is to evaluate the clinical performance of posterior restorations using HEMA free universal adhesive versus HEMA containing universal adhesive over one year using USPHS criteria.
Detailed description
The study is intended to evaluate the HEMA free universal adhesive versus HEMA containing universal adhesive when both used in conjunction with giomer aesthetic restorations in occlusal cavities in posterior teeth ICDAS III and IV. The restorations will be evaluated at baseline, 6 and 12 months according to modified USPHS criteria in terms of marginal staining, marginal adaptation and caries recurrence. Patients will be recruited from outpatient clinic of conservative dentistry department, cairo university according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. patient will be randomly allocated to intervention or control group.
Interventions
PROCEDUREBeautibond universal adhesive
HEMA free universal adhesive
PROCEDURETetric N universal bond
HEMA containing universal bond
Sponsors
Cairo University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
of participants: * Patients with occlusal caries in molars classified as ICDAS III or IV. * 19-35 years. * Males or Females. * Co-operative patients approving to participate in the trial.
Exclusion criteria
of participants: * Pregnancy. * Disabilities. * Systemic disease or severe medical complications. * Allergic history concerning methacrylate. * Rampant caries. * Heavy smoking. * Xerostomia. * Lack of compliance. * Evidence of severe bruxism, clenching, or tempromandibular joint disorders.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| marginal staining of restoration | baseline ,6 months & 12 months | marginal staining using USPHS criteria Alpha: No staining in the margin Bravo: superficial staining on the margin Charlie: deep staining on the margin |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| caries recurrence | baseline ,6 months ,12 months | caries recurrence using USPHS criteria Alpha: no recurrent caries Charlie: Caries recurrence |
| marginal adaptation of restoration | baseline ,6 months and 12 months | marginal adaptation using USPHS criteria ALPHA: Marginal continuity BRAVO: slightly detectable marginal discontinuity that does not require replacement CHARLIE: Detectable crevice or ledge at margin that requires replacement |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed