Skip to content

Donafenib as Adjuvant Therapy Following Ablation for Recurrent HCC

Thermal Ablation Combined With Low-dose Donafinib for Early Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Multicenter Prospective Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06609876
Enrollment
108
Registered
2024-09-24
Start date
2024-10-01
Completion date
2028-10-01
Last updated
2024-12-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Donafenib, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Microwave Ablation, Recurrent Tumor

Brief summary

This study intends to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose adjuvant donafenib after thermal ablation for early recurrent HCC within Milan criteria.

Detailed description

Thermal ablation is available as the major curative treatments for early-stage recurrent HCC. Donafenib was inferior to sorafenib in overall survival in untreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. No study has evaluated low-dose donafenib as adjuvant therapy after thermal ablation. There needs further investigation to explore the efficacy and safety of the combination treatment. Thus, the investigators carried out this prospective, randomized, open-label, phase II trial study to find out it.

Interventions

PROCEDUREThermal ablation

Thermal ablation of tumors

DRUGDonafenib

Donafenib ( 100 mg,bid)

Sponsors

Chinese PLA General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Sun Yat-sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. were aged 18-75 years; 2. had recurrent HCC (RHCC) diagnosed by imaging studies, the first or the second RHCC; 3. RHCC met the Milan criteria, namely single RHCC lesion less than 5 cm in diameter or no more than 3 tumors (each ≤3 cm in diameter); 4. the early RHCC (recurrent time \<1 year) 5. patients were unwilling to undergo repeat hepatectomy or liver transplantation; 6. had well-preserved liver function, i.e., Child-Pugh class A or B, and prolonged prothrombin time≤5 s; 7. patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score ≤1. 8. Ability to understand the protocol and to agree to and sign a written informed consent document.

Exclusion criteria

1. were under 18 years or over 75 years of age; 2. primary HCC; 3. recurrent HCC beyond Milan criteria; 4. RHCC with metastasis or macrovascular tumor thrombus

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tumor-free survival rate24 monthsProgression was defined as progressive disease after thermal ablation by independent radiologic review according to mRECIST or death from any cause

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survival (OS)36 monthsOS is the length of time from the date of ablation until death from any cause.
Adverse events36 monthsSafety will be evaluated according to the NCI CTCAE Version 4.03. All observations pertinent to the safety of the study medication will be recorded on the CRF and included in the final report.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactQunfang Zhou, MD
zhouqun988509@163.com86 19868000115
Backup ContactFeng Duan, Professor
duanfeng@vip.sina.com86 13910984586

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026