Skip to content

Comparison of a Demand Oxygen Delivery

Comparison of a Demand Oxygen Delivery to Continuous Flow for Administration of Oxygen During Sleep

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06609694
Acronym
DOSA
Enrollment
10
Registered
2024-09-24
Start date
2023-01-09
Completion date
2028-12-01
Last updated
2026-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obstructive Apnea

Keywords

Sleep Apnea, Down Syndrome, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)

Brief summary

Conducting a randomized control trial of oxygen in children with Down syndrome to treat moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea. The aim of the study is to conduct a comparison between the 2 methods of oxygen delivery during sleep in 15 children from Cincinnati Children's Hospital and Children's Hospital of Los Angeles. 2 polysomnographies will be performed, one with continuous flow and the second with pulse flow.

Detailed description

Cincinnati Children's Hospital received NIH funding to conduct a randomized control trial of oxygen in children with Down syndrome to treat moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea. Oxygen may be delivered through continuous flow for the duration of the respiratory cycle or pulse flow during inspiration only. Pulse flow oxygen concentrators have been used clinically in adults. However, there is limited experience with this technology in children. The advantages of pulse flow oxygen concentrator are its portability and its ability in providing compliance data. This is a pilot research study to compare the 2 methods of oxygen delivery during sleep in 15 children from Cincinnati Children's Hospital and Children's Hospital of Los Angeles. 2 polysomnographies will be performed, one with continuous flow and the second with pulse flow. The pilot study is conducted in preparation for a larger project which will include 7 sites aiming at determining the effect of oxygen treatment on the frequency of obstructive apnea, neurocognitive and cardiac outcomes. A separate Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocol of the larger study will be submitted later once approved by the NIH Data and Safety Monitoring Board.

Interventions

DEVICEPortable oxygen concentrator Inogen G5 model

The concentrator weighs 4.7 lbs. and has a battery life of 13 hours. It has 6 settings with 1 providing the lowest pulse flow and 6 provides the highest flow. The setting will be increased every 30 minutes by 1 when oxygen nadir is lower than 94% and or obstructive index is ≥ 5 /hour.

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

The aim of this study is to examine whether clinically important indices during sleep are comparable between oxygen delivery by portable and by continuous flow. This aim will be accomplished by a randomized crossover study design.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 5-17 years with or without Down Syndrome (DS). 2. Children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and obstructive apnea hypopnea index (OAHI) 5-40 / hour: The rationale for selecting this range of OAHI is that a large number of children with DS with this range of OSA severity are untreated for months to years. It is important to understand the response to oxygen across the spectrum of disease severity. Notably, children with severe disease are left with few options (e.g., tracheostomy). 3. Absence of clinically significant hypoxia defined as oxygen saturation \< 88% for 5 minutes or episodic desaturation to 60% as these levels would otherwise identify children eligible to routinely receive oxygen.

Exclusion criteria

1. Current CPAP use with documented compliance (\> 4 hrs/ night; \> 70% of nights). 2. Oxygen saturation \< 90% at rest during wakefulness 3. Chronic daytime or nighttime use of supplemental oxygen. 4. Unable to participate in a Polysomnogram (PSG). 5. Enrolled or planning to enroll in another study that may conflict with protocol requirements or confound results in this trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Drop in Apnea Hypopnea Index (0-4 /night) by 50 % or < 5 /hour6 monthsPercent of children with a drop in Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) by 50% or \< 5 /hour

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Value of Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)6 monthsThe total value of how much oxygen saturation happens while sleeping will be measured at baseline and 6 month visit.
Percentage of Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) and number of times it goes below 90%6 monthsAt the baseline and 6 month visit will measure the number of times that SpO2 falls below 90% will sleeping.
Pulse Rate during sleep6 monthsMean pulse rate during the total sleep time (beats per min) as well as the maximum pulse rate will be captured during sleep.
Frequency of apnea happening during sleep6 monthsThe total number of apnea events occurring per hour will be measured during sleep
Total hours of Sleep Time6 monthsTotal sleep time will be confirmed by an electroencephalogram (h)

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactSuzie Hicks, BS
suzie.hicks@cchmc.org513-636-4944

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026