Skip to content

Using Dry Eye As a Disease Model, Investigators Demonstrated the Optimal Selection of Individualized Clinical Interventions and the Superiority of Dynamic Treatment Discrimination in Chinese Medicine.

Demonstration Clinical Study of Dry Eye Disease Advantage

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06605495
Acronym
DED OSDI FBUT
Enrollment
4000
Registered
2024-09-20
Start date
2024-09-25
Completion date
2025-10-01
Last updated
2024-09-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Disease (DED)

Brief summary

In this study, dry eye disease (leukoaraiosis) is used as a model disease, and the methodological system for evaluating the clinical efficacy of Chinese medicine for dry eye disease is constructed with the core of subgrouping dynamic and static parallel group design, so as to carry out a real-world demonstration study of dry eye disease as a dominant disease in Chinese medicine treatment. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the selection of individualized clinical interventions and the superiority of dynamic diagnosis and treatment using dry eye as a disease model. The study provides a clinical example of a subgroup-based dynamic and static parallel group design for TCM clinical research on disease-based integrated treatment. Based on the conclusions of the efficacy evaluation study, investigators will provide real-world clinical data of dry eye syndrome for the artificial intelligence prediction of the integrated platform of individualized clinical evaluation and evidence support of Chinese medicine with multi-source data integration.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTfumigation with Chinese medicine

Eye fumigation with the Eyesight Eye Therapy,10 minutes once daily for 6 weeks.

DRUGOral herbal medicine

Patients were identified into the appropriate group according to the individual evidence profile, and the herbal formula under the corresponding evidence profile was taken orally as one dose of 150 ml of water twice a day for 6 weeks.

DRUGModern Western Medicine

Referring to the Chinese Expert Consensus on Dry Eye: Treatment (2020), this course of treatment totaled 6 weeks.

Sponsors

Xuejing Lu
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Be 18-75 years of age and of any gender * Meets Western diagnostic criteria for dry eye * Formed consent and signed the Informed Consent Form

Exclusion criteria

* Those who are unable to perform a dry eye examination due to various factors * Patients with severe diseases of the liver or renal system, or infectious eye diseases * Those who are allergic to the medications used in this study * Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding Mental illness or intellectual disability; Participants in clinical trials of other drugs within the last 3 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Chinese Medical Evidence ScaleFrom enrollment to end of 6-week treatmentThe TCM evidence scale converts symptoms and signs into TCM evidence, and assigns 1, 2, and 3 points according to three levels of severity, with reference to the Guiding Principles for Clinical Research on New Drugs of Traditional Chinese Medicine and the International TCM Clinical Practice Guidelines for Stemmed Eyes (2021-12-14). If the points of TCM evidence are higher or unchanged after the intervention, it means that the intervention measures are ineffective or inefficient, and that patients' clinical symptoms do not improve significantly or their conditions worsen after the treatment. If the TCM syndrome score increases or remains unchanged after the intervention compared with that before treatment, it means that the intervention is ineffective or inefficient, and the patient's clinical symptoms do not improve or worsen after treatment.
Ocular Surface Disease IndexFrom enrollment to end of 6-week treatmentBy evaluating the points before and after the intervention treatment, if the points are lower than before the treatment, it suggests that the intervention treatment is effective, on the contrary, it indicates that the intervention is ineffective or ineffective, and the clinical symptoms of the patients do not improve significantly or worsen after the treatment.
Fluorescein Breakup TimeFrom enrollment to end of 6-week treatmentEfficacy was evaluated by the values tested before and after the intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Schirmer Ⅰ testFrom enrollment to end of 6-week treatmentEfficacy was evaluated by the values tested before and after the intervention
Classification of blepharoplasty deficiencyFrom enrollment to end of 6-week treatmentThe efficacy was evaluated by scoring the blepharoplasty area values detected before and after the intervention. According to the Chinese Expert Consensus on Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (2023), investigators graded the results as follows: score 0: no meibomian gland deficiency; score 1: meibomian gland deficiency ratio <1/3; score 2: meibomian gland deficiency ratio 1/3-2/3; and score 3: meibomian gland deficiency ratio >2/3.
Height of the River of TearsFrom enrollment to end of 6-week treatmentEfficacy was evaluated by the values tested before and after the intervention
fluorescent staining of the corneaFrom enrollment to end of 6-week treatmentSee the Chinese Expert Consensus on Dry Eye: Expert Consensus on Definition and Classification (2020): the cornea was divided into 4 quadrants on average, and each quadrant was scored from 0 to 3 according to the staining of sodium fluorescein, with a score of 0: no staining; 1: 1-30 punctate staining; 2: >30 punctate staining but staining not fused; and 3: fusion of the corneal punctate staining with the appearance of filaments and ulcers, etc. The final tally scores for each quadrant were summed. The efficacy was evaluated by tallying the scores detected before and after the intervention.

Contacts

Primary ContactLu
luxuejing@cdutcm.edu.cn18908178510

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026