Skip to content

Cohort Profile:The Shandong Adenomyosis Cohort of Population Undergoing Reproductive Technology (SAart)

Cohort Profile:The Shandong Adenomyosis Cohort of Population Undergoing Reproductive Technology (SAart)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06604091
Enrollment
2241
Registered
2024-09-19
Start date
2024-06-30
Completion date
2030-01-01
Last updated
2025-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adenomyosis, in Vitro Fertilization

Keywords

adenomyosis

Brief summary

Previous studies have shown that compared with infertile women without adenomyosis, the clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate and continuous pregnancy rate of women with adenomyosis significantly reduce, and the abortion rate obviously increased. However, these studies lack a definite classification of adenomyosis, so the true effect of adenomyosis with different severity on pregnancy outcomes are not clear. Our research team intends to collect clinical data of infertility patients with adenomyosis receiving IVF and the detailed classification of adenomyosis according to MUSA criteria. Finally, we can have an objective recognition of adenomyosis on pregnancy outcomes, which also bring benefits to evidence-based clinical practice.

Detailed description

Previous studies have shown that compared with infertile women without adenomyosis, the clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate and continuous pregnancy rate of women with adenomyosis significantly reduce, and the abortion rate obviously increased. However, these studies lack a definite classification of adenomyosis, so the true effect of adenomyosis with different severity on pregnancy outcomes are not clear. Our research team intends to collect clinical data of infertility patients with adenomyosis receiving IVF and the detailed classification of adenomyosis according to MUSA and ultrasound consensus. Finally, we can have an objective recognition of adenomyosis on pregnancy outcomes, which also bring benefits to evidence-based clinical practice. The detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are as follows: Inclusion criteria 1.Age of all participants ≥ 20 and \< 38 years. 2.Receiving IVF treatment because of adenomyosis or other common factor, such as fallopian tube factors. 3.Conforming to MUSA criteria. 4. Body mass index \< 30 kg/m2. 5.The level of AMH ≥ 0.8 ng/ml. Exclusion criteria 1. Uterine fibroids (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) type 0--I--II or type III--IV fibroids \> 3 cm). 2. Untreated endometrial polyps, hydrosalpinx or uterine adhesions. 3. RSA or RIF. 4. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). 5. Concurrent and/or recent involvement in other research within previous 3 months of study enrolment.

Interventions

Treatment options for ovarian stimulation include long-acting and antagonist regimens and other ovulation induction regimens. Options for frozen embryo transfer include natural protocols, mild ovarian stimulation regimens, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) regimens, and down-regulated combined HRT regimens. The treatment regimen is refined in the above protocol. The treatment of patients follows the principles of real-world clinical practice.

Sponsors

The Second Hospital of Shandong University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 37 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age of all participants ≥ 20 and\< 38 years. 2. Receiving IVF treatment because of adenomyosis or other common factor, such as fallopian tube factors. 3. Conforming to MUSA criteria. 4. Body mass index \< 30 kg/m2. 5. The level of AMH ≥ 0.8 ng/ml.

Exclusion criteria

1. Uterine fibroids (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) type 0--I--II or type III--IV fibroids \< 3 cm). 2. Untreated endometrial polyps, hydrosalpinges or uterine adhesions. 3. RSA or RIF. 4. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). 5. Concurrent and/or recent involvement in other research within previous 3 months of study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
cumulative live birth ratefrom pregnancy to deliveryThe numerator is number of live births from fresh or frozen embryo transfer in one ovarian stimulation cycle. More than one live birth is considered as one live birth. Denominator is defined as patients who have undergone oocyte retrieval and have either achieved at least one live birth or who have no surplus embryos.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
implantation ratefrom transplantation to deliveryIR is the ratio of the total number of gestational sacs confirmed by TVUS to the total number of transferred embryos.
biochemical pregnancy ratefrom transplantation to pregnancySerum β-hCG level ≥ 10 mIU/mL is defined as biochemical pregnancy.
ectopic pregnancy ratefrom transplantation to clinical pregnancyEctopic pregnancy is defined as the presence of extra-uterine gestational sacs or masses.
miscarriage ratepregnancy loss before 28 gestational weeksMiscarriages mean pregnancy loss before 28 gestational weeks. Clinical pregnancy loss ≤ 12 gestational weeks is an early miscarriage, and pregnancy loss between 12 and 28 gestational weeks is a late miscarriage.
clinical pregnancy ratepregnancy loss before 28 gestational weeksClinical pregnancy is defined as visible intra-uterine pregnancy or extra-uterine pregnancy.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026