Skip to content

Swallowing Difficulties in People Over 60 Years: Prevalence, Degree of Difficulty and Intervention

Swallowing Difficulties in People Over 60 Years: Prevalence, Degree of Difficulty and Intervention

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06599021
Enrollment
99
Registered
2024-09-19
Start date
2024-12-01
Completion date
2028-04-01
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ageing, Dysphagia, Intervention

Keywords

Dysphagia, Age-related dysphagia, Health-related quality of life, Dysphagia intervention, Dysphagia characteristics

Brief summary

Participants included in SCAPIS2 (Swedish Cardio Pulmonary bioimage study) are screened regarding swallowing difficulty using a timed water swallow test. Participants who show signs of swallowing difficulty (dysphagia) are included in the present study, which encompasses s flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing function (FEES). Participants showing a moderate-severe dysphagia are randomized into one of three intervention groups: muscle strengthening training, skill-based swallowing training and a control group who will receive compensatory treatment. The study is expected to improve diagnostics and treatment of swallowing difficulties in an ageing population.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMuscular strengthening training

6 weeks daily muscular strengthening training.

BEHAVIORALSkill-based training

15 sessions skill based swallowing training lead by a speech and language pathologist during 3 weeks.

Sponsors

Lisa Tuomi
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participation in SCAPIS2 * Swallowing dysfunction according to timed water swallow test or * Swallowing dysfunction according to self-report

Exclusion criteria

* Severely impaired intellectual abilities. * Inability to consent to inclusion in the study. * Inability to answer written questionnaires in Swedish Inclusion of non-dysphagia control cohort: No signs of aspiration, slow swallowing (\<10 ml/sec) or self-rated difficulties with eating and swallowing in sub-study SCAPIS2

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Penetration-aspiration score (PAS)Baseline to post-intervention (6 weeks)Ranges from 1-8 where 8 indicates worst possible aspiration score. Swallowing safety measured from Flexible Endoscopic Examination of Swallowing (FEES).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dysphagia related symtomsUp to 12 months post-interventionPatient reported outcome measurement (PROM) with Swallowing quality of life (Swal-QOL). Measures QOL depending of swallowing difficulty. Consists of 44 items divided into 10 domains and a symtom frequency scale. Scores on each domain is transformed into scores ranging from 0-100, where 100 indicates best possible swallowing QOL. The Swedish version has been fond valid and reliable.
Tongue strengthUp to 12 months post-interventionAnterior and posterior tongue strength during swallowing and maximal effort is measured with the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI)
Body compositionUp to 12 months post-interventionBody composition will be measured using Bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA). Provides measures of fat-free mass and fat.
Cost of interventionUp to 12 months post-interventionWill be provided through hospital records regarding number of hospital visits and in-hospital treatment during 1 year from start of intervention.
Self-perceived swallowing functionUp to 12 months post-interventionMeasured with the Swedish Eating assessment tool (ÄT-10). 10 items with scores ranging from 0 to 40, higher scores indicates worse function. Scores above 3 points are considered to identify the prevalence of a swallowing dysfunction.
EQ5D quality of life questionnaireUp to 12 months post-interventionMeasured with the EQ5D 5 L. Each domain is rated on a scale from 1-5 where a higher number indicates lower QOL.
RAND-36 Quality of Life questionnaireUp to 12 months post-interventionMeasured with the RAND-36. Scores range between 0-100, where 100 indicates best possible outcome.
Assessment of swallowing efficiencyUp to 12 months post-interventionMeasurement of swallowing efficiency will be performed with the validated scale such as Yale oropharyngeal residue scale where scores range between 1-5 (none-severe)
Assessment of secretionUp to 12 months post-interventionMeasurement of swallowing function will be performed with assessment of secretion using a validated eight-point scale assesses secretion severity under the subcategories of location, amount, and response. Assessment is performed in a blinded manner.
Assessment of swallowing initiationUp to 12 months post-interventionInitiation of swallowing will be assessed in a blinded manner, where initiation will be categorized referring to where te bolus reaches befor swallowing is initiated.
Assessment of overall swallowing function from the FEESUp to 12 months post-interventionMeasurement of swallowing function will be performed with the Swedish tool DIGEST-FEES (Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity; FEES = flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing). This be utilized to describe the severity of safety, efficiency, and pharyngeal stage overall swallowing impairment on FEES. The tool will be validated for the participant group through comparisons with the other measures of swallowing function. The scale ranges from 0 (normal) to 4=life threatening

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 28, 2026