Skip to content

To Compare the Analgesic Effects of Different Nerve Block Analgesia Methods in Thoracoscopic Surgery

Comparison of Analgesic Effects of Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block, Erector Spinae Muscle Block, Thoracic Paravertebral Block Combined with Erector Spinae Muscle Block, and Intercostal Nerve Block in Thoracoscopic Surgery

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06598852
Enrollment
120
Registered
2024-09-19
Start date
2024-09-15
Completion date
2025-01-20
Last updated
2024-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Analgesia

Keywords

thoracic paravertebral nerve block, erectoralis muscle block, intercostal nerve block

Brief summary

Comparison of analgesic effects of ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block, erector spinae muscle block, thoracic paravertebral block combined with erector spinae muscle block, and intercostal nerve block in thoracoscopic surgery

Detailed description

120 patients undergoing elective thoracoscopic surgery were randomly divided into ESPB group (E group, n=30), TPVB group (T group, n=30), ESPB combine with TPVB group (ET group, n=30), ICNB group (I group, n=30). Patients in ESPB group underwent erector spinal block under ultrasound after anesthesia induction; Patients in TPVB group received thoracic paravertebral nerve block after anesthesia induction; Patients in ESPB group combined with TPVB group received thoracic paravertebral nerve block combined with erectoralis muscle block after anesthesia induction; Patients in INB group received intraoperative intercostal nerve block by the operator. All groups of patients received postoperative controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the degree of pain 1h (T1), 24h (T2) and 48h (T3) after surgery. The mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate at T1-T3 were recorded, as well as the number of effective analgesic pump compression, the amount of sufentanil and the number of relief analgesia within 48h after surgery. The occurrence of postoperative adverse reactions such as nausea, vomiting, dizziness, retention time of thoracic drainage tube, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative pulmonary complications (pneumonia, atelectasis, pleural effusion, respiratory failure, etc.) were recorded.

Interventions

Patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery underwent general anesthesia and patients in TPVB Group received thoracic paravertebral nerve block with 0.33% ropivacaine 30ml under ultrasound guidance after anesthesia induction for postoperative analgesia.

Patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery underwent general anesthesia and patients in ESPB Group received erector spinae muscle block with 0.33% ropivacaine 30ml under ultrasound guidance after anesthesia induction for postoperative analgesia.

OTHERTPVB combined ESPB group

Patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery underwent general anesthesia and patients in TPVB combined ESPB group received thoracic paravertebral block combined with erector spinae muscle block with 0.33% ropivacaine 30ml under ultrasound guidance after anesthesia induction for postoperative analgesia.

OTHERICNB group

Patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery underwent general anesthesia and patients in ICNB Group received intercostal nerve block for postoperative analgesia.

Sponsors

The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* (1) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Grade I-II; (2) Age: 18-70 years old (3) double-hole thoracic surgery was performed; (4) Agree to participate in this study and sign the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* (1) People who are allergic to anesthetics used in this study; (2) Patients with coagulation disorders (3) patients with severe heart disease, liver or renal insufficiency; (4) have a history of chronic pain or chronic opioid users (5) have a co-existing mental illness and are not fully capable of cooperating

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative pain score48 hours after surgeryVisual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the degree of pain 1h (T1), 24h (T2) and 48h (T3) after surgery, the number of effective analgesic pump compressions and the number of remedial analgesia within 48h after surgery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of postoperative complications48 hours after surgeryMean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, postoperative nausea, vomiting, dizziness and other adverse reactions at T1-T3, retention time of thoracic drainage tube, and postoperative pulmonary complications (pneumonia, atractasis, pleural effusion, respiratory failure, etc.)

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactXiming Qi
qhdddyyykyc@163.com+86-13731777660
Backup ContactZhuo Liu
liuzhuo2011@yeah.net+86-18330357618

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026