Skip to content

Antibacterial Effect of NaOCl With Etidronic Acid in Apical Periodontitis Treatment

Antibacterial Effect of Sodium Hypochlorite Combined With Etidronic Acid in Apical Periodontitis Treatment: A Prospective, Single Blinded, Randomised Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06597825
Enrollment
40
Registered
2024-09-19
Start date
2020-08-17
Completion date
2021-01-10
Last updated
2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Keywords

Bacterial reduction, etidronic acid, root canal irrigation, sodium hypochlorite

Brief summary

Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), the most commonly used irrigation solution during chemomechanical preparation, plays a significant role in eliminating bacteria within root canals. Additionally, after preparation with different concentrations of NaOCl, 30% to 70% resistant bacteria were observed in the root canals. For this reason, new protocols have been developed to increase the effectiveness of NaOCl in chemomechanical preparation and to support disinfection within root canals. Recently, etidronic acid (1-hydroxyethane 1,1-diphosphonic acid \[HEDP\]), a biocompatible chelating agent, has emerged as an alternative irrigation solution. It has been suggested to combine and use this solution with NaOCl. This study aims to evaluate the antimicrobial effectiveness of NaOCl in the root canal, which is used in combination with HEDP or sequentially with Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) in the final irrigation after retreatment. Additionally, the effect of activation with Endoactivator (EA) on microbial reduction was assessed.

Interventions

DRUGroot canal irrigation solutions (NaOCl+EDTA, NaOCl+HEDP)

After cavity preparation with sterile burs, rubber dam components were applied to the tooth. The root canal filling material was removed via retreatment files. After the working length was determined, in all the groups, the canals were filled with distilled water. S1were taken from the canal after retreatment. Irrigation protocols were applied for 4 groups. S2 were taken from the canal. Intracanal medicament was placed in the root canal, the cavity was securely sealed. After 14 days,the medicament was removed with 10 mL of 17% EDTA and subsequently irrigated with 5 ml of distilled water, S3 was taken by sterile paper points. The final irrigation was performed according to the group to which the tooth belonged, and S4 was collected as before. the root canals were dried with sterile paper points and filled gutta-percha master cones and sealer.

Sponsors

Mustafa Kemal University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

The study included teeth from patients aged 18-65 years who had no systemic disease and had not undergone antibiotic therapy in the past three months. To ensure standardization, all the treatments were performed by a single clinician. 1. A minimum of 2 years since the initial root canal treatment 2. Single rooted mandibular premolar with apical periodontitis (AP) and a canal filling within 4 mm from the apex on radiographic examination 3. The absence of pain on palpation and percussion, healthy periodontal tissues, and no mobility, 4. Presence of a coronal restoration (teeth that have not retained permanent restoration over the previous root canal treatment).

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients who have received antibiotic therapy in the last 3 months, 2. Patients with diabetes, pregnancy, immunosuppression and cardiovascular disease, 3. Absence of a coronal restoration 4. Presence of pain on palpation and percussion, mobility.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total bacterial load (CFU/ml) in root canal samples of teethFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeksIn all the groups, A sterile paper point of size R50 was placed at the working length (WL) and left in the canal for 1 minute. Three paper points were then placed into an Eppendorf tube containing phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The samples taken from the canal after retreatment were recorded as the S1. After root canal preparation and irrigation protocols, S2 sample was taken. After dried protocol, medicament was placed in the root canal.After 14 days,the intracanal medicament was removed with 17% EDTA. The root canal was irrigated with 5 ml of distilled water.S3 was taken by sterile R50 paper points. The final irrigation was performed according to the group to which the tooth belonged,the S4 was collected as before.Each sample obtained from the patient was placed into culture medium.The inoculated plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 hours. After incubation, the total bacterial counts were determined by calculating the number of colony-forming units (CFU/ml) on the plates.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026