Skip to content

Using Nudge Strategies to Promote Healthier Beverage Intake Among College Students

A Study on Nudge Interventions to Promote Changes in Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption Behaviors Among College Students

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06596564
Enrollment
1658
Registered
2024-09-19
Start date
2026-01-01
Completion date
2026-05-09
Last updated
2026-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Food Selection, Obesity

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study was to examine whether four nudging strategies influence beverage consumption behavior among Chinese university students. These interventions included sugar content information, health warning messages, hedonic labeling, and default option nudge. A between-subjects experimental design with a single factor was employed to assess the effects of these strategies on students' choices between sugar-sweetened and sugar-free beverages, thereby evaluating their effectiveness in promoting healthier beverage selections.

Detailed description

As the prevalence of overweight, obesity, and chronic diseases continues to escalate, excessive consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) has emerged as a growing public health concern globally. One approach to reducing beverage intake while conserving resources is the utilization of nudge strategies. Nudge strategies, characterized by their low cost and ease of implementation, facilitate individuals in making more accurate and beneficial choices in a predictable manner, through subtle interventions that do not prohibit any options or significantly alter incentives. This nudge experiment will be conducted in a classroom setting, where participants will be randomly assigned to one of five groups for beverage selection, completing a menu-based choice task: a no-nudge control group, a default option group, a hedonic labeling group, a sugar content information group, and a health warning nudge group.

Interventions

Display the sugar content of the drink on the platform.

Sponsors

Nanjing Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* college students * willing to participate

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The proportion (or likelihood) of selecting sugar-free beveragesday 1The probability of choosing a sugar-free beverage (binary outcome: sugar-sweetened = 0, sugar-free = 1) across five menu-selection tasks.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participants' Perceived Intrusiveness of Nudgesday 1A 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) was employed. Higher scores indicate greater perceived intrusiveness.
Participants' Support for Nudgesday 1A 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) was employed. Higher scores indicate greater support for the nudging strategy
Participants' Perceived effectiveness of Nudgesday 1A 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) was employed. Higher scores indicate greater perceived effectiveness.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 14, 2026