Skip to content

Health Coaching for Patients Waiting for Total Hip or Knee Replacements

Health Coaching in Addition to a Digital Resource to Promote Self-management for Patients Waiting for Total Hip or Knee Replacements: A Randomised Feasibility Trial

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06596031
Enrollment
36
Registered
2024-09-19
Start date
2025-02-27
Completion date
2025-10-31
Last updated
2025-06-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthritis Knee, Arthritis of Hip

Keywords

joint replacement surgery, digital resource, health coaching, telehealth, self management

Brief summary

This pilot study aims to evaluate the feasibility of collecting objective data on physical performance to measure the impact of health coaching in addition to a digital resource (Active Wait) and enable sample size calculation for a larger scale RCT.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALHealth coaching

The core belief in coaching is that people are resourceful and that the participant knows what is best for themselves. If the participants are assigned to the health coaching group, they will have access to a health coach with a physiotherapist background. Instead of offering physiotherapy advice, however, the health coaching will work with the participant to come up with ideas that work the best for them to manage their health and wellness to prepare for surgery, including addressing some difficulties the participant are facing when using the online resource.

BEHAVIORALDigital toolkit

This intervention provides, via a website, self-management support of preoperative rehabilitation for hip or knee replacement based on NICE guidelines Joint replacement (primary): hip and knee. This includes guidance for patients to undertake a strengthening programme that will aid recovery, lifestyle behaviours including weight management, diet and smoking cessation, and maximising functional independence and quality of life before surgery.

Sponsors

Sheffield Hallam University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Pilot study of a single-blinded, randomised controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients scheduled on the waitlist for a total joint replacement surgery for hip/knee, ie clinically and radiographically diagnosed, symptomatic knee/hip osteoarthritis deemed suitable for surgical intervention; * have access to the internet and the ability to navigate web-based programs; * able and willing to travel to Advanced Wellbeing Research Centre for baseline and follow-up assessments; * able to comprehend the requirements and purpose of the study and give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* other musculoskeletal lower limb or back conditions requiring assessment or treatment by a health professional in the last 6 months; * neurological impairment or condition affecting lower limb function; conditions listed as both absolute and relative contraindications for physical activities by the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM), such as unstable angina, uncontrolled diabetes; * systemic inflammatory disease (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis); * previous total joint replacement surgery (hip or knee)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global rating of change12 weeksBowens Framework - acceptability (Perceived benefits) 7-point likert scale global rating of change (GROC) with -3 being worse, 0 being no change and 3 being better
Perceived Satisfaction12 weeksBowens Framework - acceptability (Perceived satisfaction). How satisfied were you with the overall information, level of support, and ease of use of the program? Measured on a numeric rating scale, where 0 means not satisfied, 10 means significant satisfaction.
Rate of retention12 weeksBowens Framework - acceptability, percentage of participants progressing from baseline, to midpoint and post-intervention assessments
Drop out rate12 weeksBowens Framework - acceptability, percentage of people discontinuing in both groups
Adverse events12 weeksBowens Framework- practicality, measured by number, type and severity of adverse events
Rate of service utilisation12 weeksBowens Framework - implementation, measured by the number of attended sessions (health coaching) number of days during the week using the active wait website
Rates of recruitment12 weeksBowens Framework - demand, measured by n number of recruitment per week.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knee flexion/extension strength12 weekBiodex for isometric strength testing, peak torque will be calculated in N.m
4 x 10m walk test12 weekThe average time taken to complete a 10m lap (s)
Sit to stand test12 weekNumber of full repetitions from sitting to standing in a 30s period
Time up and go12 weekAmount of time taken to complete a lap from sitting to standing, walking for 3 m, turn around a marker and return to sitting position (s)
Minutes in sedentary activities1 week baseline and 1 week at completionWearable tracking using ActivPAL
12 steps test12 weekTime taken to complete 1 flight of 12 steps (s)
Demographics12 weeksheight and weight aggregated to arrive at one reported value BMI, in units kg/m\^2
Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES-8)12 weeksSelf efficacy questionnaire. Contains 8 items, each measured on a scale from 1-10. Higher score indicates greater self-efficacy.
International physical activity questionnaire-short form (IPAQ-SF)12 weeksPhysical activity level is measured in three categories, walking, moderate-intensity activities, vigorous-intensity activities, in addition to sitting. Their score is then expressed as MET-min per week.
EuroQoL Group's 5-dimension (EQ-5D-5L)12 weekHealth related quality of life questionnaire. Each dimension of the EQ-5D has 5 levels from 1-5. 1 indicates full health state, 5 indicates worse the problem. The last question, EQ-5D health scale is a scale between 0-100, where 0 indicates worst health, 100 indicates best health.
Visual Analogue Scale12 weekVAS 10 point scale for self report of pain level. With 1 being no pain and 10 being maximal pain.
Oxford knee/hip score12 weekJoint specific function questionnaire. The questionnaire contains 6 questions. Each question ranges from 0 to 4, with 4 being the best outcome. The highest score is 48.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026