Skip to content

Test of the Better Together Intervention

Pilot Test of the Better Together Intervention

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06594835
Acronym
BT Pilot
Enrollment
54
Registered
2024-09-19
Start date
2023-09-01
Completion date
2024-05-01
Last updated
2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Substance Use

Keywords

substance use, feasibility, adolescents

Brief summary

Better Together (BT) is a novel, culturally relevant library-based intervention designed to prevent substance use among Black youth (ages 11-13) affected by household challenges (i.e., parental substance use, parental incarceration, and parental mental health challenges). In partnership with public and school librarians, the investigators will conduct a randomized pilot study of BT with up to 100 youth across four sites in Baltimore, Maryland to assess: 1. Implementation fidelity via logs, assessments, and observations of participants and facilitators 2. Feasibility of all key research aspects, including recruitment, randomization, intervention, and control conditions, as well as pre, post, and one-month follow-up assessments 3. Initial effects of BT on substance use

Detailed description

This study occurred from September 2023 through May 2024 in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. The investigators partnered with two schools to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the BT intervention in a small, randomized trial. The investigators compared the outcomes of Black youth (ages 11-13) exposed to household challenges who received the intervention (n = 32) with a time-matched control group of youth exposed to household challenges (n = 27). An online random number generator was used to randomize participants to either the control or intervention group. Randomization occurred at the family level, which allowed all eligible youth from a single family to be in the same condition and minimized the potential for contamination of intervention effects. Participants completed electronic assessments three times: baseline (one week before the start of the intervention), post-test (one week after the intervention), and a 1-month follow-up (one month after the post-test). The trial ended after implementation in two schools at the end of the school year. The investigators obtained approval from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Institutional Review Board. Youth enrollment occurred one month before the start of the intervention. To be eligible, participants had to be between 11 and 13 years old, identify as Black or African American, and have been exposed to one or more household challenges. Direct youth recruitment occurred with study team members inviting families to participate via presentations at each organization. Participants were also recruited indirectly through referrals from organizational staff and enrolled participants. Recruitment materials and presentations did not include information about household challenges as an eligibility criterion to prevent the risk of stigma associated with participating. Interested youth were required to complete a participant interest form that included their name, as well as their caregiver's name and contact information. A study team member contacted the caregiver to inform them of the study and assist the caregiver in completing a screener to determine the youth's eligibility. A study team member reviewed the purpose and procedures of the study as outlined on the parental permission form. The permission form was emailed and texted to caregivers via Qualtrics to obtain signatures. Once permission was granted, all eligible youth in the family were assigned a participant ID. Oral assent was obtained from all youth before they completed the baseline survey. Both intervention and control group sessions occurred twice a week, in person, during non-school hours for four weeks. At most, 15 youth were allowed to participate in each group. Sessions were co-facilitated by two study team members. Participants were compensated $25 for each session they attended and each assessment they completed.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALBetter Together

Better Together (BT) is a 90-min, age-appropriate, culturally relevant prevention intervention to prevent substance use among Black youth experiencing household challenges (ages 11-13) by addressing the multilevel influences of substance use.

BEHAVIORALYouth In the Media (YM)

Delivered in eight in-person, 90-minute sessions concurrently with BT sessions, the YM program was designed to (1) increase participants' awareness of and access to the different types of media and free resources available at the participants local libraries, (2) discuss different types of media that center stories and experiences of Black youth, and (3) expose participants to careers in media.

Sponsors

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
11 Years to 13 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* To be eligible, participants had to be between 11 and 13 years old, * identify as Black or African American, * have been exposed to one or more household challenges (i.e., parental substance use, incarceration or mental illness)

Exclusion criteria

* Youth in foster care

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Youth Retained in the interventionFrom enrollment to the completion of the one-month follow-up assessmentRetention was evaluated in two ways. First, investigators assessed retention by the number of sessions the participant attended (dosage). Investigators defined dosage success as youth participating in five or more sessions. Second, retention was assessed by the proportion of youth who completed the post-test and 1-month follow-up. Investigators defined retention success as more than 80% of the sample was retained at all assessments.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Youth who use any substanceFrom baseline to one-month follow-upOne item was used to assess substance use behaviors: Have you ever had a drink of alcohol (more than a few sips) or tried any drug (i.e., marijuana, cigarette, prescription pills, ecstasy, cocaine, etc.)? Participants responded, 'yes' or 'no'.
Substance use knowledge as assessed by surveyFrom baseline to one-month follow upThree true/false items were used to assess substance use knowledge: (1) alcohol is considered a drug, (2) drinking alcohol or using drugs leads to poor judgment and decision-making, and (3) it is against the law for children and teenagers to use drugs. Correct responses were summed to create a scale ranging from 0 to 3. with higher scores indicating more knowledge.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 21, 2026