Skip to content

Motor Imagery Training Football Players With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair

The Effect of Motor Imagery Training on Knee Functions and Kinesiophobia in Football Players With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06594497
Enrollment
88
Registered
2024-09-19
Start date
2024-09-27
Completion date
2026-08-31
Last updated
2025-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Brief summary

Volunteer participants who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament surgery at Bursa Çekirge State Hospital and meet the inclusion criteria will be included in the study. The study will select a sample group from the universe using the probability sampling method (simple random sampling). Participants will be divided into 2 groups: Conventional Physiotherapy + Kinesthetic motor imagery training group and Conventional physiotherapy group with randomization software (https://www.randomizer.org/). Conventional physiotherapy practices created by the physician will be applied by physiotherapists working in the hospital. Knee functions will be evaluated with the IKDC scale, reaction time will be assessed with video recording supported by the Kinovea program, kinesiophobia will be assessed with the Tampa kinesiophobia scale, and finally, autonomic functions will be evaluated with the polar device. Measurements will be repeated after 6 weeks of interventions.

Interventions

OTHERConventional Physiotherapy

Conventional Physiotherapy

OTHERConventional Physiotherapy + Kinesthetic motor imagery training

Conventional Physiotherapy + Kinesthetic motor imagery training

Sponsors

Kutahya Health Sciences University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Individuals with anterior cruciate ligament repair, * Individuals who have no experience in this type of training, * Not having any vision, hearing, or speech problems that would prevent the tests from being performed. * Individuals who agree to the purposes of this study and to participate voluntarily.

Exclusion criteria

* Have previous experience in Motor Imagery techniques or training, * Having any orthopedic problem that prevents walking, * Having a history of neurological disease, * People being treated with any medication that affects the central nervous system

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
KinesiophobiaThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearTampa Kinesiophobia Scale: This scale, consisting of 17 questions, evaluates the person's avoidance of movement or fear of re-injury. A Likert-type scale consisting of 4 points is used. 1 point means 'I disagree', and 4 points means 'I agree'. The individual receives a total score between 17 and 68 on this scale. A high score means high kinesiophobia.
Activity LevelThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearTegner Activity Scale: Although the scale consists of 11 questions in total, the difficulty level increases as you go from 0 to 10. While 0 means that he is either resting or retired due to his knee problem, 10 means that he is at a level where he can play competitive football at the national and elite levels. The individual is asked to mark the most appropriate one among these 11 items according to his activity level.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knee FuctionsThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearIKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee): The IKDC is a purely subjective assessment that assigns patients a functional overall rating. Three categories are examined by the questionnaire: symptoms, athletic activity, and knee function. The symptoms subscale aids in evaluating issues like pain, stiffness, edema, and knee giving way. The stair climbing, standing up from a chair, squatting, and jumping functions are the emphasis of the sports activity subscale. Higher scores indicate higher levels of function and lower levels of symptoms, with the transformed score being regarded as a measure of function.
Self-confidence LevelThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearAthletic Injury Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (AISEQ): The questionnaire comprised 10 items representing 3 types of self-efficacy: task (3 items), barrier (3 items), and scheduling (4 items). Participants rate their self-efficacy for each of the items on a confidence scale ranging from 0% (no confidence) to 100% (completely confident).

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary ContactMeltem Işıntaş
meltem.isintas@ksbu.edu.tr+902742652031

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026