Low Back Pain
Conditions
Brief summary
Patients who come to Tavşanlı Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mustafa Kalemli State Hospital, Physical Therapy, and Rehabilitation Department who have been diagnosed with Chronic Low Back Pain by a physician will be included. Patients will be divided into two groups by the physician: conservative treatment and patients whose treatment program is determined as multi-wave locked system laser treatment in addition to conservative treatment. Pain intensity will be measured with a numerical pain rating scale. The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire will be used to evaluate the functionality of the participants, and the esthesiometer will be used to assess tactile acuity. Pressure pain threshold will be evaluated with the MicroFET 2 device. The Turkish Form of the SF-12 Quality of Life Scale will be used to assess the participants' quality of life. Pittsburgh's sleep quality index will be used to evaluate sleep quality. Patient satisfaction will be evaluated with a numerical rating scale.
Interventions
OTHERconventional treatment
Hot Pack, TENS, therapeutic ultrasound, and exercise
OTHERConventional treatment + multi-wave locked system laser treatment
Hot Pack, TENS, therapeutic ultrasound, and exercise + multi-wave locked system laser treatment
Sponsors
Kutahya Health Sciences University
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Being between the ages of 18-65 * Volunteering to participate in the study * Having low back pain that has persisted for at least 3 months
Exclusion criteria
* History of surgery in the waist area * Discopathy at a different level of the spine (Modic Type 3) * Presence of tumor in the spine * Infection in the discs * Having an inflammatory disease * Presence of neurological involvement * Fracture * Spondylosis * Spinal Stenosis * Spondylolisthesis * Radiculopathy * Having received treatment for low back pain in the last 3 months
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| pain intensity | Through study completion, an average of 1 year | Numerical Pain Rating Scale: Ratings from 0 to 10 range from no pain to the highest pain level imaginable. Studies show that a 2-point change in the evaluation made with this scale indicates a clinically significant change beyond the limits of measurement error.Zero usually represents 'no pain at all' whereas the upper limit represents 'the worst pain ever possible'. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Sleep Quality | Through study completion, an average of 1 year | Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: 19 out of 24 questions are self-answered questions. While other questions include questions to get information from a roommate or bed partner, some questions in the index are included in the scoring. There are 7 components and the total score varies between 0 and 21. If the total PSQI score is below 5, sleep quality is considered good, and if it is above 5, sleep quality is considered poor. |
| Patient Satisfaction | Through study completion, an average of 1 year | Numerical Rating Scale: Participants will score their satisfaction between 0 and 10, with higher scores indicating a higher level of satisfaction. |
| Assessment of Quality of life | Through study completion, an average of 1 year | SF 12: The SF-12 health survey is a self-reported outcome measure designed for use among the general population. It is a 12-item short-form health survey that assesses the same eight health domains as the SF-36 Health Survey. Each health domain score contributes to the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores. Scores above 50 indicate a better-than-average health-related quality of life, while scores below 50 suggest below-average health. |
| Functionality | Through study completion, an average of 1 year | The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire: This survey contains 24 questions about the impact of low back pain on a person's functionality. The yes answer given by the people is evaluated as 1 point, the no answer is evaluated as 0 points, and a total score between 0 and 24 is received.The score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 24 (max. disability) depending on the questionnaire used. |
| Tactile Acuity | Through study completion, an average of 1 year | Esthesiometer: Measurements will be taken by moving horizontally from the midline where the spinous process of the 3rd lumbar vertebra is located to the dominant part of the person. The evaluation will start from the position where the distance between two points is 0 mm, and the distance will be increased until the person can distinguish between two points. Around this determined threshold, 5 increasing and decreasing evaluations will be made and the average of the evaluation will be taken. |
| Pressure Pain Thereshold | Through study completion, an average of 1 year | MicroFET 2: Measurements will be taken 5 centimeters to the right and left of the spinous processes of the 3rd and 5th Lumbal vertebrae, which will be marked before. Two more points (on the tibialis anterior muscle of the right and left legs, 5 centimeters lateral to the tuberosity tibia) will be marked and used for control. The probe will be applied perpendicular to the skin, and the pressure will be gradually increased, starting from the point where no pressure is applied at first. At the point when the feeling of pressure turns into pain, participants will be instructed to call this point. This value will be recorded during the application, and after waiting the required time, additional measurements will be taken to calculate the pressure pain threshold. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Contacts
STUDY_DIRECTORMeltem Işıntaş
Kutahya Health Sciences University
Outcome results
None listed