Skip to content

Feasibility of Strategies to Increase SNAP Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Program Use for Families With Food Insecurity

Feasibility of a Pilot Intervention Designed to Increase SNAP Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Program Use for Families With Food Insecurity

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06593028
Enrollment
91
Registered
2024-09-19
Start date
2022-06-01
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dietary Habits

Brief summary

The Veggie Vouchers pilot intervention aimed to increase awareness and utilization of an existing SNAP F&V incentive program in South Carolina for families with food insecurity. Social determinants of health screenings were leveraged in a pediatric clinic to identify eligible families and provide information about this program. A free trial was then offered, with the long-term goal of increasing program use after the free trial ended. The primary aim was feasibility and acceptability of the Veggie Vouchers intervention among pediatricians and families.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALVeggie Vouchers pilot

This intervention aims to increase awareness and use of a Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) fruit and vegetable incentive program in South Carolina among families with young children experiencing food insecurity. To do so, brief education about this SNAP program is delivered by pediatricians to caregivers during well-child visits. Subsequently, caregivers are given 3 free produce boxes as a free trial of this program to incentivize first time use.

Sponsors

University of South Carolina
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Caregiver Inclusion Criteria: * 18 years of age or older * Had a child 2-17 years of age * Child lived in their home 50% of the time or more * Child was a patient of the general pediatrics clinic enrolled in this study * English-speaking * Enrolled in SNAP * Experiencing household food insecurity Caregiver

Exclusion criteria

* Had purchased fruits and vegetables within the past year at the community food site participating in this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intervention utilization: SNAP purchases (family uptake)Through study completion, approximately 1 yearHow many families purchased additional fruit and vegetable boxes using their SNAP electronics benefit card
Intervention acceptability: caregiversUpon completing the intervention, approximately 5 months after baselineAcceptability was assessed via surveys on caregivers satisfaction of the intervention
Intervention acceptability: pediatriciansUpon completing the intervention, approximately 1 yearAcceptability was assessed via surveys on pediatricians perceptions of the intervention
Intervention acceptabilityUpon completing the intervention, approximately 3 months after baselineExit surveys were used to assess reasons for low utilization of the intervention
Intervention utilization: free trial redemptionThrough free trial period, approximately 3 months from baselineHow many free trial vouchers were ordered and received
Intervention utilization: SNAP purchases (box frequency)Through study completion, approximately 1 yearNumber of additional fruit and vegetable boxes purchased using SNAP electronics benefit card
Intervention feasibility: recruitment screening eligibilityThrough study completion, approximately 1 yearPercent of caregivers screened who were eligible
Intervention feasibility: recruitment screening enrollmentThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearPercent of eligible caregivers who enrolled
Intervention feasibility: recruitment durationThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearDuration to reach the target sample
Intervention feasibility: retention attendanceThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearAssessment completion rates
Intervention feasibility: retention dropoutThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearPercent of sample that drops out or is lost to follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Household nutrition securityBaseline, after receiving each free fruit and vegetable box (~1x/month for 3 months after baseline), and end of the intervention (~5 months after baseline for redeemers; 3 months after baseline for non-redeemers)The Household Nutrition Security scale was used to assess a household's ability to acquire foods that meet their nutritional needs without resource limitations or worry. Scores range 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate a greater degree of household nutrition security.
Household healthfulness choiceBaseline, after receiving each free fruit and vegetable box (~1x/month for 3 months after baseline), and end of the intervention (~5 months after baseline for redeemers; 3 months after baseline for non-redeemers)The Household Nutrition Security scale was used to assess a household's ability to acquire foods that meet their health needs without resource limitations or worry. Scores range 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate a greater degree of household healthfulness choice.
Household dietary choiceBaseline, after receiving each free fruit and vegetable box (~1x/month for 3 months after baseline), and end of the intervention (~5 months after baseline for redeemers; 3 months after baseline for non-redeemers)The Household Dietary Choice scale was used to assess a household's ability to acquire foods that meet their dietary preferences without resource limitations or worry. Scores range 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate a greater degree of household dietary choice
Dietary intakeBaseline, after receiving each free fruit and vegetable box (~1x/month for 3 months after baseline), and end of the intervention (~5 months after baseline for redeemers; 3 months after baseline for non-redeemers)The National Cancer Institute's Dietary Screener Questionnaire (DSQ) was used to assess caregiver's report of children's dietary intake. Responses are quantified as cup equivalents per day, grams per day, milligrams per day, ounce equivalents per day, or teaspoon equivalents per day. Whether higher or lower numbers indicate more healthful or less healthful dietary intake is specific to each nutrient.
Household food insecurityBaseline, after receiving each free fruit and vegetable box (~1x/month for 3 months after baseline), and end of the intervention (~5 months after baseline for redeemers; 3 months after baseline for non-redeemers)The 18-item United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Household Food Security Module was used to assess household food security status. Scores range 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater degrees of food insecurity.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026