Skip to content

Functional Recovery and Pain Reduction Post-hydrodissection vs Rehabilitation in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (Hydrocarpal)

Effectiveness in Functional Recovery and Pain Reduction Following Hydrodissection vs Rehabilitation in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06590129
Acronym
hydrocarpal
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-09-19
Start date
2023-08-01
Completion date
2024-02-29
Last updated
2025-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)

Keywords

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Rehabilitation, physical therapy, Hidrodissection, Physiotherapy, Median nerve neuropathy

Brief summary

This study pretend to evaluate the effectiveness of hydrodissection vs only rehabilitation in improving pain and function in patients with CTS.

Detailed description

This prospective, longitudinal, randomized in two groups clinical study pretend to evaluate the effectiveness of hydrodissection vs only rehabilitation in improving pain and function in patients with CTS, evaluated initially and at 4 and 12 weeks.

Interventions

PROCEDUREhydrodissection of median nerve

Ultrasound guided hydrodissection of median nerve in carpal tunnel with 5% dextrose solution

OTHERPhysiotherapy

5-20 sessions in rehabilitation area with physical media: paraffin glove (10 coats for 15min), mobilizations of wrist and fingers, strectching of wrist and fingers tendons/muscles, muscle stregthening whit isometric or isotonic excercises to intrinsic muscles of the hand an forearm, and occupational therapy with techniques for sensory return, nerve and tendon sliding techniques, activities aimed at improving basic hand functions and work simulation activities.

Sponsors

Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Prospective, longitudinal, randomized clinical study, including 50 patients diagnosed with CTS. Two groups were compared: one received physical therapy and the other received median nerve ultrasound guided hydrodissection plus physiotherapy evaluated initially, 4 and 12 weeks with the Boston questionnaire and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* men and women ≥18 years of age, * members referred to and treated at the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Service of HGR N°1, IMSS Mérida Yucatán, and who had a clinical or electrophysiological diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Exclusion criteria

* included a clinical or electrophysiological diagnosis of radiculopathy, plexopathy, polyneuropathy, or other peripheral neuropathy; * current diagnosis of cancer, coagulopathy, thoracic outlet syndrome; * active infectious process or current fracture in the thoracic limb; * previous surgery for carpal tunnel release; * inability to cooperate with filling out scales, physical examination, or infiltration, as clearly detailed.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
FunctionInitially, 4 and 12 weeks.Boston´s carpal tunnel questionnaire results, where each item is scored from 1 (no symptoms/difficulties) to 5 (the worst symptoms/cannot perform the activity at all). The mean score for each scale is calculated, resulting in a score between 1 and 5, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms or function.
PainInitially, 4 and 12 weeks.Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a pain intensity measurement tool that uses a 10 cm line with two end points to indicate no pain and worst possible pain.

Countries

Mexico

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026