Skip to content

Comparison of the Clinical and Microbiological Effects of CHX and HOCl Containing Mouthwashes

Comparison of the Clinical and Microbiological Effects of CHX and HOCl Containing Mouthwashes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06589193
Enrollment
26
Registered
2024-09-19
Start date
2021-03-15
Completion date
2022-09-30
Last updated
2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Plaque

Keywords

Hypochlorous acid, chlorhexidine gluconate, antiplaque, anti-inflammatory, gingivitis

Brief summary

The primary objective of the study is to compare the antiplaque and anti-inflammatory effects of HOCl mouth rinse with those of CHX mouth rinse. The secondary objective is to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial activities of HOCl mouth rinse and CHX mouth rinse on dental biofilm.

Detailed description

The primary objective of the current clinical study is to compare the antiplaque and anti-inflammatory efficacy of HOCl mouth rinse with that of CHX mouth rinse. The secondary objective is to compare the antimicrobial activities of these two mouth rinses on dental biofilm. This single-center, triple-blind, randomized controlled crossover study was completed with 26 participants. In the study, the same participants used both HOCl (0.02%) and CHX (0.2%) mouth rinses over a 4-day re-plaque formation model. Following each mouth rinse usage, supragingival dental plaque biofilm samples were collected, and clinical parameters including the Modified Plaque Index, Bleeding on Probing Index, and Modified Stain Index were recorded. Additionally, participants were asked to evaluate the mouth rinses they used via a questionnaire. In conclusion, HOCl mouth rinse has demonstrated antiplaque efficacy comparable to that of CHX mouth rinse. When evaluating total bacterial counts, both mouth rinses exhibited similar antimicrobial effectiveness. Within the limitations of this study, HOCl may be considered a promising antimicrobial agent for dental plaque control.

Interventions

OTHERCHX

10ml,twice a day

OTHERHOCl

10ml,twice a day

Sponsors

Baskent University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

4-day plaque regrowth study model

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Being systematically healthy * Having at least 22 natural teeth (236) * Not smoking * Participants must not drink alcohol and must work during their term

Exclusion criteria

* Having periodontitis and gingivitis * Being breastfeeding or pregnant * Using medication that may affect periodontal status * Having used antibiotics in the last month * Having used any mouthwash in the last month * Using fixed, removable dentures or orthodontic appliances

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
plaque index1 monthPlaque index results were evaluated regionally and full mouth for CHX and HOCl groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
microbiology1 monthMicrobiological data were evaluated on plaque samples taken from molar teeth for CHX and HOCl groups.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026